DRUG UTILIZATION PATTERN AND PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS PRESCRIBED IN SECONDARY CARE HOSPITAL IN GUJARAT, INDIA


Nilay D Solanki, Pratik Patel

Abstract


ABSTRACT
Objective: Hypertension is the most common condition seen in primary care and leads to myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, and death if not
detected early and treated appropriately. A large number of antihypertensive drugs alone or in various combinations are available, and physicians
need to choose most appropriate drug for a particular patient. Pharmacoeconomic and drug utilization studies at regular intervals help physicians to
prescribed rational drugs with high efficacy along with minimal cost.
Methods: The prospective observational study was conducted at Seth H. J. Mahagujarat Hospital from July to December 2013. 250 hypertensive
patients, attending medicine outpatient department were included for drug utilization study and 100 hypertensive patients, attending in patients
department were included for pharmacoeconomics analysis during the study period.
Result: The most frequently prescribed antihypertensive drug as monotherapy, as combination therapy and in fixed dose combinations was calcium
channel blocker (Amlodipine). Generic drugs showed same efficacy as brand drug, but both drugs were significantly differed in the prize. Among 100
inpatients admitted for the hypertensive condition in general ward total of direct medical cost was 65.19% and total of indirect medical cost was
34.81%. β-blocker and diuretics were the most effective therapy which is followed by the clonidine, envas (Enalapril), and then, amlodipine.
Conclusion: We concluded from this study that use of β-blockers and diuretics were most cost-effective for the hypertensive patients in this study.
Keywords: Antihypertensive drugs, Drug utilization study, Pharmacoeconomics analysis.

 


| PDF |

References


REFERENCES

Saseen JJ. Essential hypertension. In: Kode-kimble MA, editors.

Applied Therapeutics: The Clinical Use of Drugs. 9th ed. USA:

Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 314.

Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/blood_

pressure_prevalence_text/en. [Last downloaded on 2016 Apr 16].

Causes of Death. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. Available

from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/

cod_2008_sources_methods.pdf.

Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H,

et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury

attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions,

-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease

Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2224-60.

World Health Organization. Impact of Out-of-pocket Payments for

Treatment of Non-Communicable Diseases in developing Countries:

A Review of Literature WHO Discussion Paper 02/2011. Geneva:

World Health Organization; 2011.

World Health Organization and World Economic Forum. From Burden

Table 3: Combination drug therapy in hypertensive patients

First line of drug Second drug

prescribed

Number of patients Combination drugs Antihypertensive

class of drug

Number of patients

Ca++channel blocker (s) Atenolol 47 β‑blockers+Ca+channel

blocker

Losartan 4

Revolol 2 Telmisartan 4

Enalapril 4 Enalapril 5

Telmisartan 2 Clonidine 5

Clonidine 2 Furosemide 7

Diuretic Amlodipine 3 Ca+2 channel

blockers+diuretics

Losartan 1

Atenolol 1 Telmisartan 1

Telmisartan 7 Revolol+enalapril Furosemide 1

β‑blocker (s) Losartan 2

Telmisartan 4 Amlodipine+furosemide Clonidine 1

Clonidine 3

Enalapril 1 Total triple therapy 29

Total 78

Table 4: Analysis of cost minimization

Brand name Cost/tablet (Rs.) Cost/30 tablet (Rs.) Suggested

generic drug

Cost/tablet (Rs.) Cost/30 tablet (Rs.) Benefit of

generic

drug (Rs.)

Amtas (Intas) 3.18 97.2 UDP (Unison) 0.6 18 77.5

Amlodac (Zydus) 3.24 95.5 79.2

Cupine at 2.89 86.7 UDP at (Unison) 0.927 27.83 58.86

Table 5: Cost‑effectiveness ratio of different antihypertensive drugs

S.No Class of antihypertensive drug Average of total cost for treatment (Rupees) (C) QALYs Cost effectiveness=C/QALYs

Envas (enalapril) 3478 0.6749 5153.38

Amlodac (amlodipine) 3551 0.6496 5467.36

Cupine‑AT (amlodipine+atenolol) 3728 0.6071 6140

Arkamin (clonidine) 3263 0.6492 5025.30

Betaloc (atenolol) 3630 0.7410 4894.57

Amifrue (furosemide) 3560 0.7499 4746

Losartan 3925 0.606 5902

QALYs: Quality adjusted life year

Solanki and Patel

Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 10, Issue 3, 2017, 120-124

to “Best Buys”: Reducing the Economic Impact of Non-Communicable

Diseases in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Geneva: World Health

Organization and World Economic Forum; 2011. Available from: http://

www.who.int/nmh/publications/best_buys_summary.

World Economic Forum and the Harvard School of Public Health. The

Global Economic Burden of Non-communicable Diseases. Geneva:

World Economic Forum and the Harvard School of Public Health; 2011.

World Health Organization. Introduction to drug utilization research.

WHO International Working Group for Drug Statistics Methodology,

WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, and

WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and

Clinical Pharmacological Services. Oslo, Norway: World Health

Organization; 2003.

Figueiras A, Caamano F, Otero JG. Methodology of drug utilization

studies in primary health care. Gac Sanit 2000;14:7-19.

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR. National heart, lung, and blood

institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation,

and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure

Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of

the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation,

and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 Report. JAMA

;289(19):2560-72.

Ganguli A, Hong SH. Profiles of Initial Drug Therapies Among

Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients with No Compelling

Indications. Poster (PCV53) Presented At: International Society for

Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 12th Annual International

Meeting, May; 2007.

After the diagnosis: Adherence and persistence with hypertension

therapy. Am J Manag Care 2005;11 13 Suppl: S395-9.

Lichtenberg FR. Are the benefits of newer drugs worth their

cost? Evidence from the 1996 MEPS. Health Aff (Millwood)

;20(5):241-51.

Available from: http://www.interlinkconsultancy.com/pdfs/

whitepapers/pharmacoeconomics_key_to_affordable_medicines.pdf.

[Last downloaded on 2016 Apr 22].

Acharya KG, Shah KN, Solanki ND, Rana DA. Evaluation of

antidiabetic prescriptions, cost and adherence to treatment guidelines:

A prospective, cross-sectional study at a tertiary care teaching hospital.

J Basic Clin Pharm 2013;4(4):82-7.

Garrison RJ, Kannel WB, Stokes J 3rd, Castelli WP. Incidence and

precursors of hypertension in young adults: The Framingham Offspring

Study. Prev Med 1987;16(2):235-51.

Gupta R, Guptha S, Gupta VP, Prakash H. Prevalence and determinants

of hypertension in the urban population of Jaipur in western India.

J Hypertens 1995;13(10):1193-200.

Malhotra P, Kumari S, Kumar R, Jain S, Sharma BK. Prevalence and

determinants of hypertension in an un-industrialised rural population of

North India. J Hum Hypertens 1999;13(7):467-72.

Deepa R, Shanthirani CS, Pradeepa R, Mohan V. Is the ‘rule of halves’ in

hypertension still valid?--Evidence from the Chennai Urban Population

Study. J Assoc Physicians India 2003;51:153-7.

Anand MP. Prevalence of hypertension amongst Mumbai executives.

J Assoc Physicians India 2000;48(12):1200-1.

Dopa M. Pattern of drug use in hypertension in a tertiary hospital:

A cross sectional study in the in-patient wards. Indian J Pharmacol

;33:456-7.

Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, Whitworth J, Beilin L,

Hansson L, et al. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society

of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension.

Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clin Exp

Hypertens 1999;21(5-6):1009-60.

Busari OA, Olanrewaju TO, Desalu OO, Opadijo OG, Jimoh AK,

Agboola SM, et al. Impact of patients’ knowledge, attitude and

practices on hypertension on compliance with antihypertensive drugs

in a resource-poor setting. TAF Prev Med Bull 2010;9(2):87-92.

Al-Tuwijri AA, Al-Rukban MO. Hypertension control and comorbidities

in primary health care centers in Riyadh. Ann Saudi Med

;26(4):266-71.

Tamuno I, Fadare J. Drug treatment for hypertension in a tertiary health

care facility in Northern Nigerian. Int J Pharm 2011;2(2):104-9.




About this article

Title

DRUG UTILIZATION PATTERN AND PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS PRESCRIBED IN SECONDARY CARE HOSPITAL IN GUJARAT, INDIA

DOI

10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.15537

Date

01-03-2017

Additional Links

Manuscript Submission

Journal

Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Vol 10 Issue 3 March 2017 Page: 120-124

Print ISSN

0974-2441

Online ISSN

2455-3891

Statistics

165 Views | 214 Downloads

Authors & Affiliations

Nilay D Solanki
Ramanbhai Patel COllege of Pharmacy, CHARUSAT, Changa
India

Pratik Patel


Article Tools


Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.