DOCKING ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY ON HYDROXY (DIPHENYL) ACETICACID AND ITS DERIVATIVES

Sudha Rajendran; Nithya G; Brindha Devi P; Charles C Kanakam

doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.18299

Authors

Sudha Rajendran Department of Chemistry, School of Basic Sciences, Vels University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nithya G Department of Chemistry, School of Basic Sciences, Vels University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Brindha Devi P Department of Bio-engineering, School of Engineering, Vels University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India,
Charles C Kanakam Depatment of Chemistry, Formerly Presidency College, University of Madras, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.18299

Keywords:

Docking, Antioxidant activity, Stacking interaction

Abstract

Objectives: The antioxidant activity of the synthesized compounds along with the standard compound for comparison is reported. There is comparison of binding analysis and the ligand interaction of the compound.

Methods: The protein crystal structure complexed with 4-methyl-6-[2-(5-morpholin-4-ylpyridin-3-yl)ethyl]pyridin-2-amine inhibitor was selected from Protein Data Bank (5FVP) for our study.

Results: The docking studies and structure-activity relationship reveals that the compound 2'-chloro-4-methoxy-3nitro benzilic acid after three different docking strategies reveals that the score was found to be higher compared with others.

Conclusion: Based on the in vitro antioxidant results, the compounds synthesized were investigated for the molecular docking study to identify the amino acid interactions in the active site pocket of nitric oxide synthase enzyme. Based on the docking score results, all the compounds were oriented toward the active site pocket occupied by the cocrystallized ligand

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bajorath J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002;1(11):882-94.

Walters WP, Stahl MT, Murcko MA. Virtual screening-an overview. Drug Discov Today 1998;3(4):160-78.

Langer T, Hoffmann RD. Virtual screening: An effective tool for lead structure discovery? Curr Pharm Des 2001;7(7):509-27.

Gohlke H, Klebe G. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002;41(15):2644-76.

Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982;161(2):269-88.

Hajduk PJ, Greer J. A decade of fragment-based drug design: Strategic advances and lessons learned. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007;6(3):211-9.

Bhattacharya S. Reactive oxygen species and cellular defense system. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2035-0_2.

Briegar K, Schiavone S, Miller FJ, Krause KH. Reactive oxygen species: From health to disease. Swiss Med Wkly 2012. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2012.13659.

Weidinger A, Kozlov AV. Biological activities of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: Oxidative stress versus signal transduction. Biomolecules 2015;5(2):472-84.

Rahman T, Hosen I, Islam MM, Shekar HU. Oxidative stress and human health. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 2012;3:997-1019.

Chang HY, Ho YL, Sheu MJ, Li YH. Antioxidants and free radical scavenging activity of Phellinus merrillii extracts. Bot Stud 2007;48:407-17.

Bairam R, Muppavarapu SM, Sreekanth S. Synthesis, characterization, biological evaluation and docking of some novel substituted 1, 3-thiazine derivatives. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9(3):233-42.

Geetha P, Kumar BL, Indra U, Sheetal BP. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. DOI: 10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i3.16485.