DEVELOPMENT OF THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO PHARMACEUTICAL CARE IMPROVEMENT CONSIDERING THE MODERN REQUIREMENTS OF HEALTH-CARE SYSTEM IN UKRAINE

  • Igor A Zupanets Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Victoriia Ye Dobrova Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Olena O Shilkina State Enterprise State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this research was to formulate the theoretical approaches to the improvement of pharmaceutical care considering the modern requirements of the public health system in Ukraine.

Methods: The analysis of pharmaceutical care has been performed using “policy triangle†model. The pharmaceutical care policy model has been developed by applying the process approach.

Results: The model of pharmaceutical care as a structural element of the national health policy has been developed. This model describes mechanisms by which the content, context, and process of the pharmaceutical care policy are influenced by the content, context, and process of the national health policy. Furthermore, we have defined the actors of the pharmaceutical care policy which are groups and organizations of various levels involved in the formation and development of the pharmaceutical care policy. Then, the structure of the pharmaceutical care policy has been elaborated. This policy is integrated into the national health-care system and is adapted to the good pharmacy practice requirements. The center of the policy is a process of pharmaceutical care delivering. The inputs, outcomes, management, and resources that are required for the pharmaceutical care process and provided by the actors have been identified. The data streams within this structure demonstrate implementation of the key elements of the pharmaceutical care process: Patient involvement, patient counseling and education, interprofessional collaboration, documentation of interaction, and follow-up. Furthermore, the mechanism of continual education and increasing of the professional level has been described in this structure.

Conclusion: Proposed framework provides a comprehensive view of pharmaceutical care as a structural element of the national health policy considering new trends of the Ukrainian health system. The proposed model of the pharmaceutical care policy allows policy-makers to address all critical-to-quality aspects and stakeholders’ needs.

Keywords: Pharmaceutical care, Health system, Quality improvement, Policy making.

Author Biographies

Igor A Zupanets, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy

Head of the Department

Victoriia Ye Dobrova, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy

Professor

Olena O Shilkina, State Enterprise State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
department of standardization of medical services

References

1. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. c 1994-2018. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 30.11.2016 â„– 1013. Available from: http:// www.zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1013-2016-%D1%80. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
2. ASHP. Statement on the pharmacist’s role in primary care. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999;56:1665-7.
3. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Good Pharmacy Practice Joint FIP/WHO Guidelines on GPP Standards for Quality of Pharmacy Services; c2018. Available from: http://www.fip.org/good_pharmacy_ practice. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
4. Pharmaceutical Care. Policies and Practices for a Safer, more Responsible and Cost-Effective Health System. Strasbourg: EDQM; 2012.
5. World Health Organization. Health policy; c2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/health_policy/en/. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
6. Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: The central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan 1994;9:353-70.
7. Buse K, Nicholas M, Walt G. Making Health Policy (Understanding Public Health). 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2012.
8. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:533-43.
9. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Pharmacist ethics and Professional Autonomy: Imperatives for Keeping Pharmacy Aligned with the Public Interest; c2018. Available from: http://www.fip.org/ statements. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
10. International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP Statement of policy. The role of the pharmacist in pharmacovigilance; c2018. Available from: http://www.apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js19754en/. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
11. Blalock SJ. The effect of community pharmacy–based interventions on patient health outcomes: A systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2016;70:235-66.
12. The State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Registry of medical and technological documentation. Pharmacist Protocol; c2018. Available from: http://www.mtd.dec.gov.ua/index.php/uk/ reiestr-mtd/item/39-protokoly-provizora-farmatsevta. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
13. Palsokar G, Madhukar T. Postgraduate research in pharmaceutical sciences in India: a survey of select pharmacy professionals. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2017;9:161-4.
14. The EDQM Pharmaceutical Care Quality Indicators Project. Final Report. Strasbourg: EDQM; 2017.
15. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Statement of Professional Standards – Code of Ethics for Pharmacists; c2018. Available from: http://www.fip.org/statements. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
16. Abbas A, Shah A, Khan N, Nasir H, Khan MH. Perceptions of patients’ care givers regarding clinical pharmacists and their practice in a developing country. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;7:168-73.
17. Koehler T. Documenting the evolution of the relationship between the pharmacy support workforce and pharmacists to support patient care. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017;13:280-5.
18. Dol HS, Jadhav SS, Pisal MA, Shaikh SK, Shinde VR. Emerging trends in patient counselling: current scenario. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2015;7:65- 8.
19. Yang S, Kim D, Choi HJ, Chang MJ. A comparison of patients’ and pharmacists’ satisfaction with medication counseling provided by community pharmacies: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:131-8.
20. Schindel TJ, Yuksel N, Breault R. Perceptions of pharmacists’ roles in the era of expanding scopes of practice. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017;13:148-61.
21. Famiyeh IM. Pharmacist prescribing: A scoping review about the views and experiences of patients and the public. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017;13:1-16.
22. Gregorio J, Lapao LV. eHealth Pharmaceutical Services: Linking Patients, Pharmacists and Physicians – Current Strategies and Lessons Learned from ePharmacare/FCT Project Technical Report; c2018. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304781761. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
23. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe. PCNE Workshop 4. eHealth/ ePharmacy; c2018. Available from: http://www.pcne.org/upload/ files/201_WS_4_PCNE_report.pdf. [Last cited on 2018 Mar 16].
Statistics
149 Views | 202 Downloads
Citatons
How to Cite
Zupanets, I. A., V. Y. Dobrova, and O. O. Shilkina. “DEVELOPMENT OF THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO PHARMACEUTICAL CARE IMPROVEMENT CONSIDERING THE MODERN REQUIREMENTS OF HEALTH-CARE SYSTEM IN UKRAINE”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 11, no. 8, Aug. 2018, pp. 356-60, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i8.26009.
Section
Original Article(s)