• Santosh Kumar Meena Ph.D. Research Scholar IAS BHU
  • S. K. PRASAD Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.)



Phytoremediation is a group of technologies that use plants to reduce, remove, degrade, or immobilize environmental toxins, primarily those of anthropogenic origin with the aim of restoring area sites to a condition useable for private or public applications. Phytoremediation efforts have largely focused on the use of plants to accelerate degradation of organic contaminants, usually in concert with root rhizosphere microorganisms, or remove hazardous heavy metals from soils or water. Phyto-remediation of contaminated sites is a relatively inexpensive and aesthetically pleasing to the public compared to alternate remediation strategies involving excavation/removal or chemical in situ stabilization/conversion. Seven aspects of phytoremediation are described in this chapter: phyto-extraction, phyto-degradation, rhizosphere degradation, rhizofiltration, phytostabilization, phytovolatization, and phytorestoration. Combining technologies offer the greatest potential to efficiently phytoremediate contaminated sites (soil and water). The major focus of this study is phytoextraction of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel, lead, selenium, and zinc. Scientists should place emphasis on their ethical responsibility for sustainable food production and environmental security since otherwise, bioterrorism could become a major threat to human and environmental security in the near future.

Author Biography

Santosh Kumar Meena, Ph.D. Research Scholar IAS BHU





1. Kolwzan, Effect of bioremediation on genotoxicity of soil contaminated with diesel Oil, Environmental protection engineering, 2009; 35(1): 19-23.
2. Duncan k, Jennings E, Buck P, Wells W, Multispecies eco-toxicity Assessment of petroleum contaminated soil, soil and sediment contamination. Boca Raton, 2003; 12 181-207.
3. Ghosh and Singh, A review on Phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of its byproducts. Applied ecology and environmental research, 2005; 3(1):1-8.
4. Anderson TA, Guthrie EA and Walton BT, Bioremediation. Environmental Science and Technology, 1993; 27: 2630-2636.
5. Prasad MNV, A State of the Art report on Bioremediation, its Applications to Contaminated Sites in India. 2011; pp: 11-18.
6. Aksoy A, Sahün U and Duman F, Robinia pseudoacaciaL. As a posssible biomonitor of heavy metal pollution in Kayseri. Turk J. Botany, 2000; 24:279-284
7. Baker AJM and Brooks RR, Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery,1989; 1:81-126.
8. Anonymous, Phytotechnology Technical and Regulatory Guidance and Decision Trees, Revised. PHYTO-3. ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). Washington, D.C, 2009.
9. McCutcheon SC and Schnoor JL, Phytoremediation transformation and control of contaminants. Wiley Interscience. 2003; pp: 985.
10. Nanthi SB, Jin HP, Brett R, Ravi N, Keun YH, Phytostabilization: A Green Approach to containment. Advances in Agronomy, 2011; 112:145-204.

11. Wendy AP, Ivan R, Baxter Elizabeth L, Richards John L, Freeman Angus S and Murphy, Phytoremediation and hyper accumulator plants. Plant Physiology . 2009; 134:18-27.
571 Views | 308 Downloads
How to Cite
Meena, S. K., & PRASAD, S. K. (2013). BIOTERRORISM IS A DANGEROUS TO ENVIRONMENT- A REVIEW. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(2), 5-7. Retrieved from