ON INVESTIGATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH OF COMMERCIAL SYNTHETIC NON-ABSORBABLE SUTURE MADE FROM OF BLUE POLYPROPYLENE MONOFILAMENT
Keywords:Tensile strength, Synthetic, Non-absorbable, Sutures, Blue, Polypropylene, Monofilament
Objective: The purpose of this research is to investigate the tensile strength of commercial synthetic non-absorbable suture made from blue polypropylene monofilament that commonly used in surgery.
Methods: The commercial synthetic non-absorbable made from blue polypropylene monofilament was prepared for this purpose. The ASTM C1557-03 was used as a standard the method for analysis. For accuracy of the measurement, the diameter of the sutures was measured using optical microscope. The tensile strength, strain at failure, and modulus elasticity of the sutures were measured following instruction from the standard test method. The graph strain versus stress was provided.
Results: Results show that that the average tensile strength of five valid tested samples is about 875.812 MPa. The average strain is found about 0.282. The average of modulus of elasticity is 4026.069 MPa.
Conclusion: It is concluded that the sutures of commercial synthetic non-absorbable suture made from blue polypropylene monofilament having linier elastic as well as plastic properties. The average tensile strength of five valid tested samples is about 875.812 MPa. The average strain at failure is found about 0.282. The average of modulus of elasticity is 4026.069 MPa.
Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007.
2. Vogels RR, Lambertz A, Schuster P, Jockenhoevel S, Bouvy ND,
Disselhorst-Klug C, et al. Biocompatibility and biomechanical analysis
of elastic TPU threads as new suture material. J Biomed Mater Res
3. Metz SA, Fraunhofer JA, Masterson BJ. Stress relaxation of organic
suture materials. Biomaterials 1990;11:197-9.
4. Kikuchi M, Nakamoto Y, Shinohara S, Fujiwara K, Tona Y, Yamazaki H,
et al. Suture granuloma showing false-positive finding on PET/CT after
head and neck cancer surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012;39:94-7.
5. Nindhia TS, Nindhia TG, Surata IW, Knejzlik Z, Ruml T. Effect of
feeding with herb of Erythrina variegata to biocompatibility of the
cocoon fiber of wild silk moth Attacus atlas for future application as
biocompatible of silk sutures. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2018;11:20-3.
6. Nindhia TG, Knejzlik Z, Ruml T, Surata IW, Nindhia TS. Indigenous
Indonesian Wild silkworm cocoon of Attacus atlas as biocompatible
film biomaterial. Mater Sci Eng 2017;204:1-5.
7. Nindhia TG, Koyoshib Y, Kanekob A, Sawadab H, Ohtab M, Hiraib S,
et al. Hydroxyapatite-silk functionally graded material by pulse electric
current sintering. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2008;22:28-33.
8. Pillai CK, Sharma CP. Review paper: Absorbable polymeric surgical
sutures: Chemistry, production, properties, biodegradability, and
performance. J Biomater Appl 2010;25:291-366.
9. Nindhia TG, Astawa P, Nindhia TS, Surata IW. Comparison tensile
strength of natural and synthetic absorbable sutures. Int J Appl Pharm
10. Shimamura N, Matchett G, Tsubokawa T, Ohkuma H, Zhang J.
Comparison of silicon-coated nylon suture to plain nylon suture in
the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model. J Neurosci Methods
11. Najibi S, Banglmeier R, Matta JM, Tannast M, Material properties
of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery. Iowa Orthop J
12. Burns LR, Lee JA, Bradlow ET, Antonacci A. Surgeon evaluation of
suture and endo-mechanical products. J Surg Res 2007;141:220-33.
13. Nobile L, Checchi L, Monaco G. Experimental analysis of tensile
properties of some suturing materials. J Mater Sci 1997;8:53-6.
14. ASTM International. ASTM C 1557-03, Standard Test Method for
Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus of Fibers. Pennsylvania, PA:
United State: ASTM International; 2003.
15. Salgado MA, Lewbart GA, Christian LS, Griffith EH, Law JM.
Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm
(Lumbricus terrestris). Springerplus 2014;3:423.
16. Marturello DM, McFadden MS, Bennett RA, Ragetly GR, Horn G. Knot
security and tensile strength of suture materials. Vet Surg 2014;43:73-9.