Int J Curr Pharm Res, Vol 8, Issue 3, 12-15Review Article



1Department of Pharmaceutics, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, By Pass Road, Bhanpur Chouraha, Bhopal 462010 (M. P) India, 2Technocrats Institute of Technology-Pharmacy, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, 462021(M. P) India

Received: 20 Apr 2016, Revised and Accepted: 31 May 2016


The present study deals with the formulation and characterization of matrix-type transdermal drug delivery system (TDS) of diltiazem hydrochloride for the treatment of hypertension. The TDS was prepared by the solvent evaporation method on a mercury substrate. Ten formulations were prepared which differed in the ratio of matrix-forming polymers. Formulations TDS1 to TDS10 were composed of HPMC (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) and gelatin 10%, w/v in the combination of single polymer, two polymers (1:1) and three polymers in the ratio of 1:1:1, 1:2:1, 2:1:1 and 1:1:2 respectively. All the ten formulations contained 5 % (w/w) of diltiazem hydrochloride, 1 % (v/w) of propylene glycol and 1 % (w/w) of tween 80 (based on total polymer weight). The transdermal drug delivery system characterized for various physicochemical properties such as thickness, moisture content (MC), moisture uptake, water vapor transmission (WVT), folding endurance, drug excipients interaction, drug content and in vitro release study. On the basis physicochemical properties and in vitro release study, formulation TDS8 was found to be better than the other formulations, and it was selected as the developed formulation.

Keywords: Diltiazem, Hypertension, Transdermal drug delivery, In vitro evaluation


Transdermal therapeutic system is defined as self-contained, discrete dosage forms which, when applied to the intact skin, delivers the drug(s), through the skin, at a controlled rate to the systemic circulation [1]. By delivering a steady flow of drugs into the bloodstream over an extended period of time, the transdermal system can avoid the “peak and valley” effect of oral or injectable therapy [2]. Controlled drug release can be achieved by Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS), also known as “patches”. They are dosage forms designed to deliver a therapeutically effective amount of drug across a patient’s skin at a predetermined rate over a prolonged period of time [3].

Transdermal drug delivery provides many advantages over the conventional mode of drug administration as it avoids hepatic first-pass metabolism and improves patient compliance [1, 4]. The transdermal drug can increase the therapeutic value of many drugs by avoiding specific problems associated with the drug. e. g. gastrointestinal irritation, low absorption, short half-life necessitating frequent dosing, self-administration is possible with this system, the drug input can be terminated at any point of time by removing transdermal patch [1].

Diltiazem hydrochloride is a calcium channel blocker exhibits 40% oral bioavailability due to hepatic first-pass effect [5]. To overcome bioavailability problem, dose-dependent side effects and frequency of administration. Diltiazem hydrochloride monolithic matrix type transdermal patches were prepared and characterized.

Diltiazem hydrochloride is an antihypertensive class of calcium channel blocking drug. It is commonly prescribed for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina. Diltiazem hydrochloride undergoes an extensive hepatic metabolism, mainly through cytochrome P-450. Oral bioavailability of diltiazem hydrochloride is approximately 30% to 40% due to an important biotransformation. It has an elimination half-life of 3.5 h and has an absorption window from the upper intestinal tract. Efficacy of the oral dose may get diminished due to incomplete drug release from the conventional dosages form at absorption site. Diltiazem requires multiple oral daily dosages in order to maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations. Therefore, diltiazem hydrochloride is a suitable drug for the transdermal formulation, which offers controlled delivery of drug [6, 7].

Main components of transdermal patch

Polymer matrix

The backbone of TDDS, which controls the release of the drug. The polymer should be chemically non-reactive, should not decompose on storage, should be nontoxic, cost should not be high. Example-cellulose derivatives, gelatin, shellac, waxes, gums, Polybutadiene, hydrin rubber, polyisobutylene, silicon rubber, nitrile, acrylonitrile, Polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyacrylate, polyamide, polyurea, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, etc.


The transdermal route is an extremely attractive option for the drugs with appropriate pharmacology and physical chemistry. Transdermal patches offer much to drugs which undergo extensive first pass metabolism, drugs with narrow therapeutic window, or drugs with short half life. eg fenatyl, nitroglycerine etc.

Permeation enhancers

Increase permeability of stratum corneum so as to attain higher therapeutic levels of the drug. These are of three types-lipophilic solvent, surfactants, and two component systems. Example-DMSO


Increase permeability of stratum corneum, to attain higher therapeutic levels of the drug.

Backing laminates

Should have low modulus or high flexibility. Example-vinyl, polyethylene.

Release liner

Protects the patch during storage. The liner is removed prior to use.

Other excipients like plasticizers and solvents [8].


Diltiazem hydrochloride (DH) was obtained from Modi Mundi Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Meerut, India as gift sample. PVA, gelatin and HPMC procured from Central Drug House Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India was procured. All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical reagent grade and used as received. Double distilled water was used throughout the experiment.

Method of preparation

The matrix type film was prepared on a mercury substrate using the method reported by Balasubramanyam and Vasavada (1979)[9] various TDS1 to TDS10 were composed of HPMC (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) and gelatin 10%, w/v in the combination of single polymer, two polymer (1:1) and three polymer in the ratio of 1:1:1, 1:2:1, 2:1:1 and 1:1:2 respectively. Diltiazem hydrochloride (5% w/w based on total polymer weight), propylene glycol 1% v/w (based on total polymer weight), as plasticizer and tween 80, 1% w/w (based on total polymer weight) as penetration enhancer were used to cast the drug containing transdermal film. The solvent evaporation was controlled by an inverted glass funnel of a suitable diameter. After complete evaporation of the solvent at (35±5oC), the film was removed from the glass ring and stored at controlled humidity (RH 51%) and temperature (25±2oC), the prepared film were characterized for thickness, MC, WVT, drug excipients interaction, drug content and in vitro release studies [10, 11].

Characterization of transdermal drug delivery system


The screw gauge (Mercer, USA) was used to determine the film thickness. Before the measurement, the pointer in dial gauge was adjusted to zero deflection. The average value of film thickness is given in table 1.

Moisture content (MC)

The weighed film samples were kept in an IR moisture balance (CSI, Bombay) at a temperature of 100±2o to dry for one hour. The percent moisture content was observed directly from IR moisture balance reading scale.

Percentage moisture uptake

The weighed films were kept in desiccators at room temperature for 24 h containing a saturated solution of potassium chloride in order to maintain 75% RH. After 24 h, films were reweighted and percent moisture uptake was determined by the formula of percentage moisture uptake = final weight–initial weight/initial weight x 100.

Water vapor transmission rate (WVT)

The WVT was determined by the method reported by Kaning and Goodman [10] at 25±5o and 75% RH. WVT rates were calculated by the formula of Kanig and Goodman and results are recorded in table 2. WVT = Amount of moisture transmitted/Area x time.

Glass vials of 5 ml capacity were washed thoroughly and dried to a constant weight in an oven. About 1 gm of anhydrous calcium carbonate was taken in the vials and the polymer films were fixed over the brim with the help of adhesive tape. Then the vials were weighed and stored in a humidity chamber at 75 % RH condition for a period of 24 h.

Folding endurance time

A strip of the specific area was cut evenly and repeatedly folded at the same place till it broke. The number of times the film could be folded at the same place without breaking gave the value of folding endurance.

Drug content

Drug content was determined in 1 cm2 polymeric transdermal film and the drug was extracted in double distilled water. The transdermal film was cut into pieces of 1 cm2 which were further fragmented into pieces. The drug from the transdermal film was extracted in double distilled water and volume made up to 100 ml in a volumetric flask with double distilled water. One ml of this solution was further diluted to 10 ml with double distilled water and absorbance was measured against double distilled water as blank at 235 nm using Shimadzu 1700 UV/Visible double beam spectrophotometer and percentage drug content given in table 2.

Drug excipients interaction

50 mg of each ingredient was mixed separately into a series of 10 ml volumetric flask, containing 5 ml of 10μg/ml drug solution and allow keeping aside for 48hr at the ambient condition with intermittent shaking. The volume of each flask made up to 10 ml with phosphate buffer solution pH 6.0 and mixed thoroughly. After 48 hr, the content of each volumetric flask was filtered through Whatman filter paper no. 1 and then absorbance of the solution was measured at 235 nm with phosphate buffer solution pH 6.0 as blank, using Shimadzu 1700 UV/Visible double beam spectrophotometer [12].

Drug release study

The in vitro release of diltiazem hydrochloride from the transdermal film was determined using locally fabricated Franz diffusion type cell [13, 14]. A commercial semipermeable membrane was employed in the study as the permeation barrier (Dialysis membrane-110, average flat width-32.34 mm, average diameter 21.5 mm, molecular weight cut off 12 KD, HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India). The semipermeable membrane was mounted on the receptor compartment of the Franz diffusion cell and product approximately equivalent to 5 mg of the drug was applied. The receptor compartment contained 30 ml of the phosphate buffer (pH-6) solution at 37±5 °C. Samples of 5 ml were withdrawn at a time interval of two hours and the same was replaced with 5 ml of the fresh media solution in order to maintain the sink condition. The withdrawn samples were diluted with an isotonic buffer (pH-6) solution. The samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically for drug content at 235 nm using double beam Simazdu 1700 spectrophotometer [12].


The matrix-type transdermal drug delivery system of diltiazem hydrochloride was developed by the film casting on a mercury substrate to obtain a controlled drug delivery of diltiazem hydrochloride. Ten formulations were developed which differed in the ratio of matrix-forming polymers. These transdermal drug delivery systems characterized for various physicochemical parameters such as thickness, moisture content (MC), percentage moisture uptake, water vapor transmission (WVT), folding endurance, drug excipients interaction, drug content and in vitro release studies. The thickness of the film specimens was found from 0.36±0.15 mm to 0.45±0.12 mm. MC is a part of film composition which affects WVT, structural characteristic of film and hydration of skin. It was found in the range of 10.90±0.50% to 15.65±0.30%, the difference may be attributed due to the nature of polymer composition. Moisture uptake of the formulation was from 04.35±0.87% to 31.56±0.82%. WVT directly influence the absorption of drug by affecting the hydration of the skin. Higher WVT removes water from stratum corneum, and low WVT keeps skin hydrated and enhances drug permeation through the skin [12].

It was found in the range of 0.79±0.83 to 1.32±0.48 (g/h/cm2), the excipients did not interfere with the drug. Folding endurance of all the formulation was found under acceptable limit i.e. more than 100 time. Drug content was determined by weighing the prepared film (1 cm2) and dissolving in the double distilled water and analyzed at 235 nm using double beam Simazdu 1700 spectrophotometer. The drug content was found in the range of 93.52 to 99.82% in all the formulations. The in vitro release of diltiazem from transdermal drug delivery was determined using modified Franz diffusion type cell and artificial membrane mounted on receptor compartment [14, 15].

The in vitro release study revealed that on increasing the concentration of PVP in the transdermal drug delivery system, the drug releases increases in combination with HPMC and gelatin. It was found from 28.37 to 56.42% in 24 hr. The release mechanism of diltiazem from transdermal formulations was also determined on the basis of theoretical dissolution equations viz. zero-order, first-order, Higuchi matrix and Peppas-Korsmeyer kinetic models. The regression coefficients and rate constants from in vitro release profiles of diltiazem were calculated using PCP Disso Version 3 software (Pune, India) and are reported in table 3. Release pattern of diltiazem from transdermal formulations mainly followed Higuchi matrix and Peppas-Korsmeyer model, which may be due to the composition of the formulations, presence of some of drug in crystal stage and diffusion of drug from matrix.

Table 1: Composition of transdermal films

S. No. Film code Polymer ratio HPMC: PVP: gelatin
1. TDS1 1:0:0
2. TDS2 0:1:0
3. TDS3 0:0:1
4. TDS4 0:1:1
5. TDS5 1:1:0
6. TDS6 1:0:1
7. TDS7 1:1:1
8. TDS8 1:2:1
9 TDS9 2:1:1
10. TDS10 1:1:2

All values are expressed as mean of three observations, HPMC, Hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose; PVP, Polyvinylpyrrolidone, Gelatin.

Table 2: Evaluation data of transdermal films

Film code Thickness Mm % M C % Moisture uptake WVTx10-4 g/h/cm2 % Drug content
TDS1 0.36±0.15 13.79±0.58 08.38±0.42 1.31±0.08 97.66
TDS2 0.41±0.08 10.90±0.50 32.56±0.82 0.80±0.10 98.38
TDS3 0.45±0.12 15.35±0.25 12.35±0.31 1.72±0.11 97.52
TDS4 0.38±0.19 15.65±0.30 09.75±0.39 0.89±0.36 96.39
TDS5 0.36±0.29 13.79±0.58 08.38±0.42 1.31±0.08 97.64
TDS6 0.40±0.26 10.90±0.50 32.56±0.82 0.80±0.10 98.27
TDS7 0.42±0.13 13.35±0.48 12.67±0.43 1.52±0.78 99.82
TDS8 0.39±0.18 16.65±0.29 04.35±0.87 0.79±0.83 98.94
TDS9 0.41±0.03 12.35±0.98 11.35±0.31 1.32±0.48 93.52
TDS10 0.43±0.23 14.65±0.78 13.55±0.69 0.97±0.65 94.69

Table 3: The regression coefficients and rate constants for in vitro release study of transdermal drug delivery systems

Formulation Zero-order model First-order model H-M model P-K model
R k1 r k2
TDS1 0.9646 16.4824 0.8394 -0.1398
TDS2 0.8664 17.0263 0.8339 -0.1282
TDS3 0.9673 14.9474 0.8849 -0.1476
TDS4 0.9782 16.0846 0.8746 -0.1746
TDS5 0.9743 17.7464 0.7074 -0.1736
TDS6 0.9874 15.8474 0.8462 -0.1277
TDS7 0.9655 17.5874 0.8874 -0.1048
TDS8 0.9722 16.8736 0.8763 -0.1277
TDS9 0.9616 16.6454 0.8746 -0.1484
TDS10 0.9734 16.8474 0.8756 -0.1746

*H-M, indicates Higuchi matrix; P-K, Peppas-Korsmeyer; r, indicates correlation coefficient; k1-k4, rate constants of zero-order, first-order, Higuchi matrix, Peppas-Krosmeyer; TDS1 to TDS10 different transdermal drug delivery systems.

Fig. 1: In vitro release profile of diltiazem hydrochloride from transdermal formulations


It can be concluded from the above study that formulation TDS8 was found to be better as compared to other formulation on the basis of evaluation and in vitro release profile. It shows that Diltiazem hydrochloride could be administered transdermally. Hence, on the basis of the method of preparation and evaluation, it can be concluded that the transdermal systems can be produced commercially for drugs employed for effective treatment of hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, and angina pectoris.


Declare none


  1. Misra AN, Transdermal drug delivery. In: Jain NK. editors. Controlled and novel drug delivery. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributor;1997;1:100-29.
  2. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Controlled drug delivery, concepts, and advances. Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2008. p. 412.
  3. Kumar JA, Pullakandam N, Prabu SL. Trandermal drug delivery system: an overview. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2010;3:49-53.
  4. Ansel HC, Allen LV, Popovich NG. Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delivery systems. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, USA, Printed in India at Gopsons Papers Ltd. Noida; 2005;7:63-78.
  5. Kerins DM, Robertson D. Drugs used for the treatment of myocardial ischemia. In: Hardman JG, Limbrid LE, Goodman A. editors. A textbook of pharmacological basis of therapeutics. McGraw-Hill; 2001;10:855-63.
  6. Iannuccelli V, Coppi G, Bernabei MT, Cameroni R. Air compartment multiple-unit
  7. A system for prolonged gastric residence. Part I. Formulation study. Int J Pharm 1998;174:47-54.
  8. Brijesh SD, Avani FA, Madhabhai MP. Gastro retentive drug delivery system of ranitidine hydrochloride: formulation and in vitro evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2004;5:77-82.
  9. Aggarwal G, Dhawan S. Development, fabrication, and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system a review.; 2009. p. 7.
  10. Balasubramanyam VI, Vasavada RC. Evaluation of lanolin alcohol films and kinetics of triamcinolone acetonide release. J Pharm Sci 1979;68:782-7.
  11. Kanig JL, Goodman H. Evaluative procedures for film-forming materials used in pharmaceutical applications. J Pharm Sci 1962;51:77-83.
  12. Guy RH, Hadgrft J. Physicochemical aspects of percutaneous penetration and its enhancement. Pharm Res 1988;5:753-8.
  13. Chien YW, Keshary PR, Hang YC, Sarpotdar PP. Comparative controlled skin permeation of nitroglycerin from marketed transdermal delivery systems. J Pharm Sci 1983;72:968-70.
  14. Aqil M, Sultana Y, Ali A. Matrix-type transdermal drug delivery systems of metoprolol tratrate: in vitro characterization. Acta Pharm 2003;53:119-26.
  15. Aqil M, Ali A, Sultana Y, Dubey K, Najmi AK, Pillai KK. In vivo characterization of monolithic matrix-type transdermal drug delivery systems of pinacidil monohydrate: a technical note. AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:E1-E5.

About this article





Additional Links

Manuscript Submission


International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research
Vol 8, Issue 3, 2016 Page: 12-15

Online ISSN



56 Views | Downloads

Authors & Affiliations

Rama Shukla
Department of Pharmaceutics, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, By Pass Road, Bhanpur Chouraha, Bhopal 462010 (M. P) India

L. K. Omray
Technocrats Institute of Technology-Pharmacy, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, 462021(M. P) India


  • There are currently no refbacks.