PHARMACY STUDENTS’ OPINIONS OF USING MOCK QUESTIONS TO PREPARE FOR SUMMATIVE EXAMINATIONS
Objective: Mock questions are thought to benefit to students through help with learning, revealing specific areas of learning difficulties, practice examination timing and aiding a higher mark in the examination. The literature suggests practice questions have a direct impact on students’ academic performance and improving examination confidence.
The aim of the study was to gather opinions of pharmacy students on using mock examinations and practice questions to prepare for summative examinations.
Methods: Paper based questionnaires were distributed to all fourth year pharmacy students at the start of a university scheduled workshop session. The data was transcribed onto a Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheet and analysed.
Results: Out of all fourth year pharmacy students 73% completed the questionnaire of which 91% had received access to mock questions but only 92% of those who had access used them. Common themes were identified; the benefits of using mock questions were ‘knowledge’, ‘examination style’ and ‘identification of weaknesses’. Furthermore, most participants chose ‘Year 3 Calculations exam’ (62%) as the most useful summative examination for which to use mock questions.
Conclusion: Mock questions have a place in improving the performance of pharmacy students in examinations. The study results showed that the majority of participants who used mock questions found them to be useful in promoting learning, revealing specific areas of learning difficulties, improving awareness of examination structure, practicing their ability to apply knowledge to questions under examination conditions and to motivate students to revise more using better strategies.
2. Andala H, Digolo O, Kamande M. 126.96.36.199; 2014. Available from: http://188.8.131.52/bitstream/handle/123456789/5422/publication%201a.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y [Last accessed on 20 Mar 2020]
3. Tofade T, Elsner J, Haines ST. Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. Am J Pharm Edu 2013;77:155.
4. Siddiqui S, Siddiqui S, Mustafa Q, Rizvi A, Hossain I. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock PACES. Clin Teacher 2017. p. 15. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28612515. [Last accessed on 24 Oct 2019]
5. Craft J, Christensen M, Shaw N, Bakon S. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: a student engagement study. Nurse Education Today 2017. p. 59. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28898728. [Last accessed on 24 Oct 2019]
6. Roediger H, Karpicke J. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives Psychol Sci 2006;1:181-210.
7. Powell A, Yip S, Hillman J, Larson S, Cooley J, Davis L. Preparing pharmacy graduates for interviews: A collaborative state-wide mock interview session to improve confidence. Curr Pharm Teaching Learning 2015. p. 7. Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.wlv.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S1877129715000635?via%3Dihub [Last accessed on 30 Oct 2019]
8. Byron LO, James LM. Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses. Dental Education; 2004. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15217084 [Last accessed on 24 Oct 2019]
9. Griswold L, Overson C, Benassi V. Embedding questions during online lecture capture to promote learning and transfer of knowledge. Am J Occupational Thera 2017;71:71032300101.
10. Dotson WH, Sheldon JB, Sherman JA. Supporting student learning: improving performance on short essay exams using realistic practice opportunities. J Scholarship Teaching Learning 2010;10:106–18.
11. Koenigsfeld C, Wall G, Miesner A, Schmidt G, Haack S, Eastman D, et al. A faculty-led mock residency interview exercise for fourth-year doctor of pharmacy students. J Pharm Practice 2012. p. 25. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/?term=A+Faculty-Led+Mock+Residency+Interview+Exercise+for+Fourth-Year+Doctor+of+Pharmacy+Students [Last accessed on 24 Oct 2019].
12. Smith F. Research methods in pharmacy practice. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002. p. 112-44.
13. Seale C. Researching society and culture. 3rd ed. [ebook] London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. p. 190. Available from: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=enandlr=andid=uhBCvNlypL4Candoi=fndandpg=PA181anddq=disadvantages+of+interviews+in+data+collectionandots=bEZV3Xe19Candsig=wBoLerT6jNUAY5R-PUSSRg30S8g#v=onepageandq=disadvantages%20of%20interviews%20in%20data%20collectionandf=false [Last accessed on 01 Apr 2020]
14. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol 2006;3:76.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.