A STUDY ON ACCEPTABILITY OF E-LEARNING IN INDIAN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Authors

  • GEORGE EASAW Area Chair, Operations Management, School of Business, Alliance University, Bangalore, India
  • MIHIR DASH Area Chair, General Management, School of Business, Alliance University, Bangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2021v9i6.42813

Keywords:

E-learning, Emerging economies, Stakeholder involvement, Feedback-based e-learning model, Low acceptability

Abstract

Though e-learning is broadly accepted across the education spectrum as an effective teaching-learning medium, its acceptance is found very wanting. This paper looks at the basic process of innovation that can induce teaching faculty in India to take up e-learning and to understand how innovative teaching-learning processes like e-learning can be applied to education. It goes on further to identify and understand some of the broadly accepted reasons for the low acceptability and usage with the help of an online survey. The survey was used to study what motivates the student and teacher to take e-learning as an effective pedagogy and to answer some of the pertinent problems relating to its low acceptability. The analysis of the survey results is given. A new “stakeholder involvement and feedback based” theoretical model is proposed explaining how to implement e-learning effectively in educational institutions in India. Some possible suggestions like effective problem-solving tools like Total Quality Management (TQM) to help overcome the drawbacks in the system are also proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 61–67. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/2226/

• Carroll, J. (2011). Trend: The Future of Knowledge….. and the Era of Fast Knowledge Obsolescence! Retrieved from https://jimcarroll.com/2011/10/trend-the-future-of-knowledge/

• Comer, D. R., Lenaghan, J. A., & Sengupta, K. (2015). Factors that affect students’ capacity to fulfill the role of online learner. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 145–55. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054751

• Davies, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008

• Endres, M. L., Hurtubis, C. A., Chowdhury, S., & Frye, C. (2009). The multifaceted nature of online mba student satisfaction and impacts on behavioral intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 304–12. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.5.304-312

• Mody, A. & Aiyer, S. (2011). The demographic dividend: Evidence from the Indian States. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/The-Demographic-Dividend-Evidence-from-the-Indian-States-24660

• O’Sullivan, D. & Dooley, L. (2009). Applying Innovation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

• Office of the Dean of College at Princeton University. (2020). Academic integrity at Princeton. Retrieved from https://odoc.princeton.edu/sites/odoc/files/Academic%20Integrity%20Booklet%202020-21.pdf

• Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning, strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw Hill.

• Rosett, A. (2002). Waking in the night and thinking about E-learning. In A. Rosset (Ed.), ASTD E-learning Handbook. New York: McGraw Hill.

• Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

• Stanford Office of Community Standards Student Affairs. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://communitystandards.stanford.edu/policies-and-guidance/what-plagiarism#:~:text=%22%20For%20purposes%20of%20the%20Stanford,research%2C%20strategies%2C%20writing%20or%20other

• Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing Innovation, Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (4e). New Delhi: Wiley India.

• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., & Davis, G.B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. doi:10.2307/30036540

• Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258. doi:10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x

Published

04-08-2021

How to Cite

EASAW, G., & DASH, M. (2021). A STUDY ON ACCEPTABILITY OF E-LEARNING IN INDIAN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. Innovare Journal of Education, 9(6), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2021v9i6.42813

Issue

Section

Research Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)