Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 9, Issue 10, 55-61Original Article



aApplied Microbiology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshashila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452001, India
Email: shadab15khan@gmail.com

Received: 03 Jun 2017 Revised and Accepted: 31 Aug 2017


Objective:The present study was carried out to evaluate SSF process for theproduction of avermectin by Streptomyces avermitilis NRRL 8165 using easily available grains, millets and some agricultural by-product.

Methods:Various substrates were screened for their ability to support avermectin production. Different parameters to maximize the yield of avermectin by S. avermitilisNRRL 8165 under SSF were optimizedby conventional one factor at a time approach and parameters optimized earlier were adopted for thesubsequent study.

Results:Sorghum seeds used as solid substrate supported maximum growth and total avermectin production (4.6 mg g-1 dry substrate). The optimum values for maximum avermectin production were: moistening medium containing g l-1 KH2PO4 1; MgSO4.7H2O 0.4, inoculum size 20 %(24 h old culture in yeast extract-malt extract dextrose medium) v/w of initial dry substrate, substrate particle size 0.5 to 4 mm, incubation temperature 28 °C, initial moisture level 105%, incubation period of 15 d, 8 % w/w sucrose and 5% w/w soyameal. The avermectin yield with optimized fermentation condition was 5.8 mg g-1 dry substrate which is 1.3 fold higher as compared to non-optimized condition.

Conclusion:Avermectin produced by S. avermitilis are widely used as ananthelmintic agent in the medical, veterinary and agricultural applications. In comparison with submerged fermentation, SSF can become an alternative cost-effective method for the production of avermectin.This report demonstrates the feasibility of employing agro-based substrate, that could reduce antibiotics production cost.

Keywords: Solid state fermentation, Avermectin,Streptomyces avermitilis, Sorghum, Optimization


Avermectin produced by Streptomyces avermitilis are 16-membered macrocyclicpolyketidesantibiotics [1]. It has broad-spectrum anthelmintic activity against nematodes and arthropod parasites [2]. Recent testing revealed that avermectin also have potent antibacterial activity against various multidrug-resistant strainsof Mycobacterium tuberculosis[3]. Presently, avermectin are exclusively produced by submerged fermentation (SmF) using mutants of S. avermitilis. Gao et al. [4] reported 5.1 gl-1avermectin B1aproductions using a mutated organism S. avermitilis 14-12A at flask scale. These mutants are produced by various time and labour-intensive methods [5]. Chromosomal instability has also been reported in S. avermitilis, which is higher in mutant strains as compared to wild strain [6].Novak et al. [7] reported instability in avermectin production, sporulation and pigmentation of S. avermitilis C-18/6 strain during subculturing. However, SmFhas various disadvantages including ahigh volume of polluting effluent production, high volume and cost technology, high energy consumption, high risk of contamination, costly raw material, expensive bioreactor and complex downstream processing [8, 9].

Solid-state fermentation (SSF) has been developed as a microbial culture with solid substrates or impregnated inert support. SSF process is believed to mimic natural environment and encourage the microorganism to work at its best for the production of the product [9]. Compared with SmF, SSF has various advantages, including less waterrequirement,less energy, less production cost, less wastewater, simpler equipment, reduced volume of production media and reduced contamination risk[10]. SSF has very high potential for the production of secondary metabolites. Moreover, some secondary metabolites can only be produced under SSF conditions, like coniosetin, acremonidins A-E, pyrrocidienes A and B [11]. Several studies have been published recently on the production of secondary metabolites in SSF from Streptomyces like cephamycin C, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, actinorhodinandmethylenomycin. SSF has been proved to be more efficient for production of cephamycin C, tetracycline and oxytetracycline as compared to SmF[9].

The microbial metabolites biosynthesis greatly influence by physiological, nutritional and microbial parameters of fermentation process. To improve production of desire metabolite, optimization of these parameters were critically important [12]. Literature survey indicated that this organism has not been so far evaluated for the production of avermectin under SSF. The present study was carried out to evaluateSSF process for production of avermectin by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 using easily available grains, millets and some agricultural byproduct.



An authentic sample of avermectin (abamectin, containing 80 % avermectin B1a) was procured from Baoding Jaihe Fermentation Co., Baoding, PRC. All other chemicals and solvents used were of AR grade except methanol (HPLC grade).


Streptomycesavermitilis NRRL 8165 a wild-type avermectin producer was used in the study and procured from northern regional research Laboratory, Peoria, Illinois, USA. It was stored in 20 % glycerol at-80 °C for long-term preservation. The working cultures of the microorganism were prepared by cultivation on yeast extract-malt extract glucose (YMG) agar and incubated at 28 °C until sporulation occurred (4-6 d) and slants were stored at 4 °C.

Solidstate fermentation

All substrates like wheat bran, wheat rawa (wheat grains broken into small pieces of thesize of 0.1-1 mm), seeds of sorghum, amaranth, pearl millet, barley, maize, potato (fresh) and sawdust were obtained locally. Except for wheat bran and wheat rawa, other substrates were lightly crushed and passed through 40 and 10 mesh sieves. The fraction which passed through the 40 mesh sieve but retained by the 10 mesh sieve was collected and used as solid substrate (particle size 0.177 to 0.420 mm). All substrates were dried in anoven at 60 °C for 24 h. In 25×150 mm test tube, 2 g of solid substrate thoroughly mixed with 2 ml tap water (100 % initial moisture level) and autoclaved at 121 °C (15 psi) for 20 min. After sterilization, there was no free flowing water present in all the tubes. The inoculums were prepared by growing 1 ml spores suspension (1×107 spores/ml) in 25 ml YMG broth for 24 h under sterile condition. The sterilized initially100 % moistened (v/w) substrate was inoculated with0.4 ml of theseinoculums (20 % v/w of theinitial dry substrate). The contents of the tubes were well mixed and incubated at 28 °C in incubation chamber humidified by keeping distill water containing tray for various time periods.The substrate supporting themaximum production of avermectin was selected for further study.

Moistening media

Different moistening media, as reported in theliterature for use with Streptomyces in SSF were tested (table 1). The avermectin production and biomass were analyzed in the fermented mass at 15th days of incubation.

Table 1: Avermectin production and growth of S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 on sorghum with different moistening mediain 15 d of incubation

Moistening medium Ingredients (g l-1) Avermectinproductiona Biomassb
A KH2PO4 1; MgSO4.7H2O 0.4; pH 7 [17] 5.21±0.035 141.12±3.21
B KCl 0.02; MgCl2 0.02; pH 7 [30] 1.06±0.007 52.45±1.51
C KH2PO45; NH4NO3 5, MgSO4.7H2O 1, NaCl 1, CoCl2.6H2O 0.001, MnSO4.7H2O 0.0008, ZnSO4.7H2O 0.0017, FeSO4.7H2O0.0025, pH 6.5 [18] 3.91±0.049 114.48±0.60
D K2HPO4 5.3, NaHPO4 1.98, MgSO4.7H2O 0.2, NaCl 0.2, CaCl2.2H2O 0.02 [19] 2.82±0.280 101.71±2.26
E MgSO4.7H2O 0.01, KH2PO40.02; NH4NO3 0.05, NaCl 0.01, pH 7 [20] 4.30±0.120 125.15±0.98

amg g-1 dry substrate, bmg dry biomassg-1 dry substrate, Values are the mean±standard error of 3 replicates

Effect of pH of the moistening medium

The effect of initial pH of thesubstrateon theproduction of avermectin wasstudied by varying the pH of moistening medium (Medium A) from pH 5.5-8.5. The pH was adjusted with 0.1N hydrochloric acid or 0.1N sodium hydroxide. To measure post-sterilization pH, 1 g of thesterilized substrate was stirred in 10 ml distilled water and pH was measured after settling the solid matter [13].

Optimization of the culture conditions for avermectin production

Different parameters to maximize the yield of avermectin by S. avermitilisNRRL 8165 under SSF were investigated. Parameter optimizes earlier was adopted during optimization of subsequent parameters.The effect of incubation temperature (24-28 °C), initial moisture content (60-120%), inoculums size (5-25 %) and substrate particle size on avermectin production was evaluated. The effect of additional carbon source (soluble starch, sucrose, maltose, glucose, molasses, lactose and fructose) all at 10 % w/w and additional nitrogen source (organic nitrogen source-soyameal, peanut meal, peptone, malt extract and yeast extract at 5 % w/w, while inorganic nitrogen source–(NH4)2SO4, KNO3, NaNO3 and NH4NO3 at 0.5 % w/w) were studied.

Extraction and analysis

For avermectin extraction, 0.5 g of thefermented substrate was extracted with methanol (5 ml) and the contents were agitated for 1 h at room temperature in a gyratory shaker at 150 rpm. The contents were centrifuged, and the pellet obtained was again mixed with another aliquot of 5 ml of methanol, kept on a gyratory shaker overnight and subsequently centrifuged. The supernatants were pooled, volume made-up to 10 ml and analyzed by HPLC method as described by Gaoet al. [4] with some modifications. A C18 column (diameter 4.6×250 mm, length 284 mm, particle size 5 µ) was developed with methanol-water (85:15) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min-1. The column temperature was set at 45 °C and products were monitored by UV detector at 245 nm. The quantity of total avermectin was calculated from the integration value at 245 nm using an authentic sample of avermectin as a standard [14].

Table 2: Effect of initial pH of moistening media on selected parameters of sorghum, avermectin production and biomass accumulation of S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 in 15 d of incubation

Moistening medium pH Post-sterilization pH of substratea Avermectin productionb Biomassc Reducingsugard
5.5 6.86±0.12 4.90±0.08 131.2±4.20 2.47±0.040
6 6.87±0.15 4.88±0.05 134.2±3.80 1.92±0.113
6.5 6.89±0.09 4.78±0.07 129.5±2.11 1.69±0.125
7 6.89±0.08 4.96±0.040 132.3±4.36 1.61±0.040
7.5 6.88±0.15 4.92±0.035 134.8±4.11 1.68±0.025
8 7.00±0.12 5.01±0.045 129.9±5.30 1.34±0.030
8.5 7.57±0.10 4.93±0.069 129.8±2.69 1.58±0.049

a1 g of sterilized substrate was stirred in 10 ml distilled water and pH was measured after settling the solid matter, b mg g-1 dry substrate, cmg dry biomass per gram of dry substrate, dreducing sugar released from sorghum after autoclaving in mg g-1 wet substrate, Values are the mean±standard error of 3 replicates.

Biomass estimation

Biomass accumulated during the fermentation was estimated by themethod reported by Kagliwalet al. [13]. A standard curve was prepared using N-acetyl glucosamine as standard (R2= 0.997) and was correlated to dry biomass of S. avermitilisNRRL 8165 grown in liquid culture (R2= 0.991). Biomass has been represented as mg dry biomass per gram of dry substrate (mg db g–1dsb).

Reducing sugar estimation of substrate

For analysis of reducing sugar released during autoclaving, 20 ml distilled water was added in 2 g of theautoclaved substrate and kept on a gyratory shaker at 180 rpm for an hour. The Clear solution was separated from the substrate and the amount of reducing sugar released from substrate was determined by DNS method [15].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA. Student’s t-test was employed to investigate statistical differences and P<0.05 was considered significant. Unless otherwise indicated, all values were the means of three independent trials±standard deviations. No significant differences were observed between individual replicates.Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and regression coefficient (R2) were also calculated.


Evaluation of various substrates for avermectin production

Different solid substrates viz. wheat bran, wheat rawa, sorghum, amaranth, pearl millet, barley, maize, potato and sawdust were screened for production of avermectin by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165. Five substrates were found to be capable of supporting the growth and production of avermectin. Fig. 1 shows the time course of avermectin production and biomass accumulation of these substrates. Sorghum was found to be the best substrate giving a maximum production of 4.4±0.02 mg g-1dsb (dry substrate basis) followed by wheat rawa, pearl millet and amaranth at 15 d. Rice gave the lowest production of avermectin (2.35±0.063 mg g-1dsb) in same period of incubation. Further incubation did not show any significant increment in antibiotic production (fig. 1a). Sorghum also supported maximum biomass of 133.63±3.73 mg of db (dry biomass) g–1 of dsb at 15 d. Amaranth, rice and pearl milletalso showed growth of 111.68±5.59, 83.71±3.62, and 97.21±3.51 mg of db g-1of dsb, respectively at 15 d. Wheat rawa produced maximum biomass at 20 d (99.66±13.8 mg of db g-1of dsb) (fig. 1b), and further incubation after 20 d did not show increment in biomass (data not shown).

Optimization of process parameters

Among the five different moistening media tested Medium A showed maximum production of avermectin (5.2 mg g-1dsb) as well as biomass accumulation as compared to other moistening media (table 1). The effect of initial pH levels (5.5-8.5) of medium A on avermectin production during SSF was evaluated (table 2). Initial pH of moistening medium does not show asignificant effect on biomass accumulation and avermectin production. To evaluate theeffect of initial pH on sorghum, post-sterilization pH and reducing sugar content were measured. After sterilization, substrate pH and reducing sugar released during autoclaving did not show significant change along with different initial pH value of moistening medium (table 2).Also at the end of the fermentation pH of all tested variables did not change. Temperature affects microbial growth, spore formation, germination and microbial physiology, thus affecting product formation. Analysis of avermectin production revealed that maximum yield (5.40±0.156 mg g-1dsb) is recorded at 28 °C (fig. 2). Reduced avermectin production was observed at higher or lower incubation temperatures. Fig. 2 represent theeffect of inoculums level on avermectin production by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 on sorghum. Progressive increases in product yield are observed with increase in inoculums from 5 to 20 % of theinitial dry substrate and after that product yield slightly decrease. Maximum avermectin production of 5.40±0.175 mg g-1dsb was observed with 20 % inoculums level in 15 d.

Fig. 1: Avermectin production and growth profile of S. avermitilis NRRL 8165on solid substrates. (a) Represent avermectin production, (b) Represent biomass accumulation of S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 on different solid substrates. Initial moisture content 100 %, inoculums level 20 % v/w, incubation temperature 28°C, incubation time 15 d. Values are the mean±standard error of 3 replicates

Fig.2:Avermecin production at selected inoculums level and temperature range by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165.Initial moisture content 100 %,incubationtime 15 d.Values are the mean±standard error of 3 replicates

The effect of initial moisture contents of the substrate (sorghum) on avermectin production is given in fig. 3. The result indicated that the maximum yield of avermectin (5.55±0.214 mg g-1dsb) was obtained from 105 % initial moisture and afurther increase in moisture levels reduced the avermectin content. After the fermentation, all the tubes with different initial moisture levels were showed relatively same final moisture content. At low moisture content, avermectin accumulation reduced because the water content was not sufficient enough for growth and metabolic activities. The experimental data revealed that avermectin production was affected by the particle size. Maximum avermectin production (5.61±0.210 mg g-1dsb) was recorded with mixed size (0.5 to 4 mm) sorghum particles when initial moisture content was 105 % (fig. 3).

The impact of supplementation of external carbon sources on avermectin production was studied and the results have shown 20 % improvement in the avermectin production with sucrose and 12 % with maltose (both at 10 % w/w) (fig. 4). A marginal non significantimprovement was observed with lactose. However, more than 35% reduced avermectin production was noticed with the supplementation of soluble starch suggesting that this carbon source could be a repressor of avermectin production in SSF.Glucose, fructose and molasses showed aslightly reduction in avermectin production. To determine the optimum sugar level, different concentrations of sucrose was supplemented in the range (6-14 % w/w). Maximum production (5.61 mg g-1dsb) was observed with 8 % sucrose concentration (fig. 4). Increase in the concentration of sucrose beyond this adversely affected avermectin production. The effect of different nitrogen sources on avermectin production by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 was studied at optimized SSF environment (fig. 5). Results revealed that among selected nitrogen sources, soyameal at a given concentration (5 % w/w) showed highest antibiotic production, while all other nitrogen sources resulted in decrease production of antibiotic compare to control (fig. 5). Further evaluation of soyameal concentration showed a parabolic nature of production pattern indicating that this nitrogen source play acritical role on avermectin production (fig. 5).


SSF has become an interesting alternative for theproduction of secondary metabolites since the metabolites are more concentrated, more stable and their downstream processing are easy as well as less costly [16]. There are several factors which affect the SSF processes, among these; selection of suitable substrate is crucial [9]. The solid substrates not only supply the nutrients for growth of microorganism, but also serve as an anchorage for the cell. Since no substrate was reported for production of avermectin using SSF.

Fig.3:Avermectin production at selected substrate particle size and moisturelevels by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165. Inoculums level 20 % v/w, incubationtemperature 28°C, incubation time 15 d. Values are the mean±standard error of 3 replicates

Different types of solid substrate were used for avermectin production in SSF. Among the tested substrates, five substrates (sorghum, amaranth, pearl millet, rice and wheat rawa) were supported avermectin production and growth of S. avermitilis(fig. 1). Sorghum supported maximum growth and avermectin production as compared to other substrates. Substrate-dependentvariations in production of metabolites were also reported in theliterature[17-22].

Production profile and growth curve ofS. avermitilisNRRL 8165 on different substrates showed apositive correlation between growth and secondary metabolite production (r = 0.9941; R2= 0.9883). The possible reason for the reducedavermectin accumulation and growth on wheat rawa and rice could be attributed to theformation of aggregates, limiting thegrowth of microorganism by reducing surface area. Based on the above results, sorghum was found to be most suited amongst the tested substrates for growth and avermectin production by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165. In SSF, sorghum has been widely used for ethanol and organic acid production [8].Sorghum contains 72.09 % carbohydrate, 10.62 % proteins, 6.7 % fibers, 3.46 % fatty acids, 2.53 % sugars, various minerals and vitamins [23]. It works as solid substrate and also contains all the components that could support growth of S. avermitilis NRRL 8165. However, this work apparently is the first report regarding use of sorghum for secondary metabolite production.

Medium A supported maximum biomass as well as avermectin production by this strain. Vastral and Neelagund [17] have reported this medium A for production of neomycin by Streptomyces fradiae NCIM 218. Many processes (ATP, DNA and RNA synthesis) occurring in theliving system requires phosphorus [24]. Magnesium works as a cofactor of the enzymes involved in protein synthesis [25].Ababutainet al. [26] reported that salt of magnesium and potassium are the most appropriate for growth and secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species. Medium C and E containing NH4NO3 led to relatively low levels of avermectin and biomass in the present case. Khaliq et al. [21] also reported theinhibitory effect of ammonium ion on tylosin production in SSF by Streptomyces fradiae NRRL 2702.

In most of the fermentation, the control of pH of the medium at optimum level is essential for achieving maximumproduct. Reports on secondary metabolite production under SSF showed asignificant effect of initial pH of moistening medium on antibiotic production [13, 17, 19-22], but in this study pH of moistening medium did not show any effect in biomass and avermectin production (table 2). This may be attributed to the fact that sorghum has high buffering capacity which resists change in pH as well as other tested parameters. Irrespective of type of fermentation, sizes of inoculum affect the formation of final product. As shown in fig. 2, optimum inoculums level was 20 % for the avermectin production. Lower and higher inoculums level than the optimum resulted in decreased avermectin production. The Higher amount of inoculums may cause quick and too much biomass production thereby leading to fast nutrient depletion and ultimately reduce secondary metabolite synthesis. A low inoculums density leads to insufficient biomass and end product synthesis [21].

Fig.4: Evaluation of carbon addition effect on avermectin production by S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 under SSF with sorghum as substrate (control: only sorghum). Inset effect of different concentration of sucrose. * P<0.05;** P<0.01; ***P<0.005 variable vs control (student’st test)

In case of SSF, theMoisture level is one of the imported factor that affects growth and production of desire product [27]. The highest avermectin production was obtained at 105 % initial moisture contents (fig. 3). Low moisture decreased theavailability of nutrients thus lowering the growth and finally reduces the production of secondary metabolites [28]. Under higher moisture level substrate porosity decreased which reduced mass transfer [29]. Similar observations were noticed in the literature [20, 22, 30] during SSF studies carried out for other metabolites.

Substrate particle size is acrucial factor in SSF process. Small particle sizes provide larger surface area for growth but decrease interparticle porosity. Larger particle size decrease surface area, limit nutrient transfer and increase interparticle space with suitable respiration and aeration characteristics. The particles sizes (0.5-4 mm) of thesubstrate were found to be optimal size of the substrate for maximum avermectin production (fig. 3). Data suggest that selection of substrate particle size is one of the essential requirements for production optimization in SSF [17, 22].

In solidsubstrate, some of the important nutrients necessary for growth and secondary metabolite synthesis for microorganism may also be present at sub-optimal level. Hence, theaddition of other nutrients may improve product formation in SSF processes. S. avermitilis NRRL 8165 can grow and produce avermectin on sorghum, but the organism may needed additional carbon source for maximum secondary metabolite synthesis. Different carbon sources were supplemented to solid substrate at 10 % (w/w). Results showed disaccharides supported, while monosaccharide’s decreased avermectin production (fig. 4). Readily available carbon sources like glucose, fructose and molasses were reported to work as a repressor for enzymes which are involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites [21]. Asagbraet al. [31] also reported thestimulatory effect of disaccharides in secondary metabolism. In SSF environment organism suffer from osmotic stress and synthesized solutes responsible for osmoregulation called compatible solutes. Sucrose is used as one of the compounds to reduce osmotic stress. Elibol [32] reported sucrose might also act as an enzyme system inducer responsible for thesynthesis of a polyketide antibiotic actinorhodin produced by Streptomyces coelicular A3 (2). Yang and ling [33] also reported stimulatory effect of sucrose on tetracycline production with sweet potato residue by Streptomyces viridiciens ATCC 11989 under SSF. A similar observation was also reported in pikromycin production by Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC15439. An optimum concentration of sucrose (139 g l­-1) was required for pikromycin production [34].

Fig.5: Screening of different nitrogen sources avermectin productionbyS. avermitilis NRRL 8165 on sorghum. Inset effect of different concentration of soyameal. * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; ***P<0.005 variable vs control (student’st test), organic nitrogen source - soya meal, peanut meal, peptone, malt extract and yeast extract at 5 % w/w, while inorganic nitrogen source -(NH4)2SO4, KNO3, NaNO3 and NH4NO3 at 0.5 % w/w

Soyameal is complex, cheap and commercially available nitrogen sources and hasadvantage of slow breakdown during the fermentation. Addition of soyameal (at 5 % w/w) has apositive effect on avermectin biosynthesis under SSF (fig. 4). When different concentration of soyameal (1-9 % w/w) was added, it showed a parabolic graph of avermectin production (fig. 4). Li et al.[35] reported soyameal is the best nitrogen source for streptolydignA production by Streptomyceslydicus AS 4.2501. Bhavnaet al. reported that maximum growth and antimicrobial compound production by Streptomyces carpaticus MTCC 11062 required an optimumconcentration of soyameal[36].Mahalaxmiet al.[22] also reported acritical role of soyameal in rifamycin B production by Amycolatopsissp RSP 3 under SSF. In thepresent study with the optimum fermentation conditions, maximum avermectin production (5.8 mg g-1dsb) was recorded in 15 d of incubation.


Present work represents the first report of avermectin production by S. avermitilis in SSF condition.Maximum avermectin production was recorded with sorghum as a substrate. Initial pH of moistening medium does not affect the biomass and avermectin production on sorghum in the tested range. The identified and optimized process parameters include 105 % initial moisture content, 20 % (v/w) inoculums, incubation at 28 °C, incubation time 15 d, 8 % sucrose (w/w) and 5 % (w/w) soyameal. Under the optimal condition, the avermectin production of 5.8 mg g-1dsbhas achieved an approximated 1.3 fold improvement over initial yield (4.42 mg g-1dsb) with non-optimized conditions.It was reported that under SmFcondition S.avermitilis NRRL 8165 (ATCC 31267) produce 0.175 mg ml-1avermectin [37], while in optimized SSF condition this strain produces 5.8 mg g-1dsbavermectin. In future SSF process for avermectin can become an alternative to classical submerged fermentation.


Shadab Khan thanks, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India for Senior Research Fellowship [09/301/(0124)/2012/EMR-I].


All authors contributed equally


The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication


  1. Burg RW, Miller BM, Baker EE, Birnbaum J, Currie S, Hartman R, et al.Avermectins, new family of potent anthelmintic agents: producing organisms and fermentation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1979;15:361-7.

  2. Egerton JR, Ostling DA, Blair LS, Eary CH, Suhayda D, Cifelli S, et al. Avermectins, new family of potent anthelmintic agents: efficacy of the B1a component. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1979;15:372-8.

  3. Lim LE, Vilcheze C, Ng C, Jacobs WR Jr, Ramon-Garcia S, Thompson CJ. Anthelmintic avermectins kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including multidrug-resistant clinical strains. AntimicrobAgents Chemother 2013;57:1040-6.

  4. Gao H, Liu M, Liu J, Dai H, Zhou, Liu X, et al.Medium optimization for the production of avermectin B1a by Streptomyces avermitilis 14-12 using response surface methodology. BioresourTechnol 2009;100:4012-6.

  5. Thuan NH, Pandey RP, Sohng JK. Recent advances in biochemistry and biotechnological synthesis of avermectins and their derivatives. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol 2014;98:7747-59.

  6. Chen W, He F, Zhang X, Chen Z, Wen Y, Li J. Chromosomal instability in Streptomyces avermitilis:major deletion in the central region and stable circularized chromosome. BMC Microbiol 2010;10:198.

  7. Novak J, Kopecky J, Kofronova O, Vanek Z. Instability of production of avermectins, sporulation and pigmentation in Streptomyces avermitilis. CanJMicrobiol 1993;39:265-7.

  8. Xu ZQ, Feng XH, Zhang D, Tang B, Lei P, Xu H. Enhanced poly (gammaglutamic acid) fermentation by Bacillus subtilis NX-2 immobilized in an aerobic plant fibrous-bed bioreactor. BioresourTechnol 2014;155:8-14.

  9. Pandey A, Soccol CR, Mitchell D. New developments in solid-state fermentation, I-bio-processes and applications. Process Biochem 2000;35:1153-69.

  10. Pandey A. Solid-state fermentation. BiochemEng J 2003;13:81-4.

  11. Barrios-González J. Solid-state fermentation: physiology of solid medium, its molecular basis and applications. Process Biochem 2012;47:175-85.

  12. Kennedy M, Krouse D. Strategies for improving fermentation medium performance: a review. J IndianMicrobiolBiotechnol 1999;23:456-75.

  13. Kagliwal LD, Survase SA, Singhal RS. A novel medium for the production of cephamycin C by Nocardialactamdurans using solid-state fermentation. BioresourTechnol 2009;100:2600-6.

  14. Curdova E, Jechova V, Zima J, Vanek Z. The effect of inorganic phosphate on the production of avermectin in Streptomyces avermitilis. J Basic Microbiol 1989;29:341-6.

  15. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 1959;31:426-8.

  16. Robinson T, Singh D, Nigam P. Solid state fermentation: a promising microbial technology for secondary metabolite production. Appl Microbial Biotechnol 2001;55:284-9.

  17. Vastrad BM, Neelagund SE. Optimization and production of neomycin from different agro industrial wastes in solid state fermentation. Int J Pharma Sci Drug Res 2011;2:104-10.

  18. Nagy V, Szakacs G. Production of transglutaminase by Streptomyces isolates in solid-state fermentation. LettApplMicrobiol 2008;47:122-7.

  19. Alberton LR, VandenbergheLPS, Assman R, Fendrich RC, Rodriguéz-León J, Soccol CR. Xylanase production by Streptomyces viridosporus T7A in submerged and solid-state fermentation using agro-industrial residues. Braz Arch BiolTechnol 2009;52:171-80.

  20. Bussari B, Saudagar PS, Shaligram NS, Survase SA, Singhal RS. Production of cephamycin C by Streptomyces clavuligerus NT4 using solid state fermentation. J IndMicrobiolBiotechnol 2008;35:49-58.

  21. Khaliq S, Rashid N, Akhtar K, Ghauri MA. Production of tylosin in solid state fermentation by Streptomyces fradiae NRRL-2702 and its gamma irradiated mutant (γ-1). LettApplMicrobiol 2009;49:635-40.

  22. Mahalaxmi Y, Sathish T, Subba Rao C, Prakasham RS. Corn husk as a novel substrate for the production of rifamycin B by isolated Amycolatopsis sp. RSP 3 under SSF. Process Biochem 2010;45:47-53.

  23. Nutrient data laboratory. Available from: http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list. United States Department of Agriculture. [Last accessed on 10 May 2016]

  24. Prokofieva-Belgovskaya A, Popova L. The influence of phosphorus on the development of Streptomyces aureofaciens and on its ability to produce chlortetracycline. J Gen Microbiol 1959;20:462-72.

  25. Wolf FI, Cittadini A. Magnesium in cell proliferation and differentiation. Front Biosci 1999;4:607-17.

  26. Ababutain IM, Aziz ZKA, AL-Meshhen NA. Optimization of environmental and nutritional conditions to improve growth and antibiotic productions by Streptomyces Sp. Isolated from Saudi Arabia Soil. Int Res J Microbiol 2013;4:179-87.

  27. Raimbault M. General and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. Egypt J Biotechnol 1998;1:174-88.

  28. Carrizales V, Rodrigues H, Sardina I. Determination of specific growth rate of molds as semisolid cultures. Biotech Bioeng 1981;232:321-33.

  29. Martins S, Mussatto SI, Martinez-Avila G, Montanez-Saenz J, Aguilar CN, Teixeira JA. Bioactive phenolic compounds: production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review. BiotechnolAdv 2011;29:365-73.

  30. Li QS, Xu JJ, Zhong JJ. Production of L-glutamate oxidase and in situ monitoring of oxygen uptake in solid state fermentation of Streptomyces sp. N1. ApplBiochemBiotechnol 1997;62:243-50.

  31. Asagbra EA, Sanni IA, Oyewolen BO. Solid state fermentation production of tetracycline by Streptomyces strains using some agricultural wastes as substrate. W J Microbiol Biotech 2005;21:107-14.

  32. Elibol M. Optimization of medium composition for actinorhodin production by Streptomyces coelicolorA3 with response surface methodology. Process Biochem 2004;39:1057-62.

  33. Yang SS, Ling MY. Tetracycline production with sweet potato residues by solid-state fermentation. BiotechnolBioeng 1989;33:1021-8.

  34. Yi JS, Kim M, Kim SJ, Kim BG. Effects of sucrose, phosphate, and calcium carbonate on the production of pikromycin from Streptomyces venezuelae. J MicrobiolBiotechnol 2015;25:496-502.

  35. Li LZ, Qiao B, Yuan Y. Nitrogen sources affect streptolydigin production and related secondary metabolites distribution of Streptomyces lydicus AS 4.2501. Chin J ChemEng 2007;15:403-10.

  36. Bhavana M, Talluri VP, Kumar KS, Rajagopal SV. Optimization of culture conditions of Streptomyces carpaticus (MTCC-11062) for the production of antimicrobial compound. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6:281-5.

  37. Li M, Chen Z, Zhang X, Song Y, Wen Y, Li J. Enhancement of avermectin and ivermectin production by overexpression of the maltose ATP-binding cassette transporter in Streptomyces avermitilis. BioresourTechnol 2010;101:9228-35.

How to cite this article

  • Shadab Khan, Pushpendra Awadhiya, Shridhar Patil, Tushar Banerjee. Avermectin production by solid state fermentation-a novel approach.Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9(10):55-61.

About this article




Solid state fermentation, Avermectin, Streptomyces avermitilis, Sorghum, Optimization





Additional Links

Manuscript Submission


International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vol. 9, Issue 10, 2017 Page: 55-61

Online ISSN



10 Views | Downloads

Authors & Affiliations

Shadab Khan
Applied Microbiology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshashila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh - 452001, India

Pushpendra Awadhiya
Applied Microbiology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshashila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh - 452001, India

Shridhar Patil
Applied Microbiology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshashila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh - 452001, India

Tushar Banerjee
Applied Microbiology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshashila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh - 452001, India

Article Tools


  • There are currently no refbacks.