The simulated patient methodology (SPM) is a form of participatory observation and can be used to assess the quality of counselling. The aim is to review those papers reporting the use of the SPM in German community pharmacies (CPs) from the beginning of 2005 to the end of 2018. The reporting items in the study were derived from the PRISMA Statement. We conducted a systematic search in the GVK-Plus, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Additional sources included the personal literature collection of 1 of the reviewers and the reference lists from international systematic reviews and potentially relevant papers. The quality of the papers included was evaluated using the AXIS tool. A total of 5 papers were included. The SPM that was used varied greatly in the papers. The quality of counselling was assessed in the papers as being rather poor. The quality of the papers differed for specific assessment criteria. Only an extremely small number of papers could be included, in contrast to other countries. The papers for Germany demonstrate that there is a considerable need for improvement in the quality of counselling in CPs. Also, the deficits identified here for the application of the SPM should be avoided in future papers. It must also be recommended that the SPM be reported in future papers using uniform reporting standards, which are yet to be developed, to ensure better comparability.

Keywords: Systematic review, Counselling, Simulated patient methodology, Community pharmacies, Germany


Download data is not yet available.


1. Martins SF, Van Mil JF, da Costa FA. The organizational framework of community pharmacies in Europe. Int J Clin Pharm 2015;37:896-905.
2. AMG–Medicinal products act in the version of the notification of 12 December 2005 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3394), last amended by Article 0 of the Act dated 22 March 2020 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 604); 2020. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
3. AMVerkRV–Regulation about pharmacy-only and over-the-counter medicinal products dated 24 November 1988 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2150), last amended by Article 2 of the Regulation dated 26 September 2018 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 1386); 2020. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
4. BAH–German Association of Medicinal Product Manufacturers. The medicinal product market in Germany; 2019. Available from: redakteur_filesystem%2Fpublic%2FBah_Zahlenbroschuer_042019_WEB.pdf. [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
5. German Federal Statistical Office. GENESIS online database; 2020. Available from: online/data?operation=previousandlevelindex=2andstep=2andtitel=Ergebnisandlevelid=1582578734872andacceptscookies=false. [Last accessed on 31 Jan 2020]
6. ABDA–Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists. The pharmacy–fig.–Data–Facts 2019; 2019. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
7. ApBetrO–Ordinance on the Operation of Pharmacies in Germany dated 26 September 1995 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 1195), last amended by Article 2 of the Act dated 13 January 2020 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 66); 2020. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
8. BAK–Federal Chamber of Pharmacies. Guidelines and tools; 2020. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
9. Anon. Test purchases: Advise well, dispense very well; 2015. Available from: apothekenpraxis/nachricht-detail-apothekenpraxis/nrw-kammern-werten-15000-testkaeufe-aus/. [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
10. Driscoll DL. Introduction to primary research. In: Lowe C, Zemliansky P, editors. Writing spaces: Readings on writing. Vol. 2. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press; 2011. p. 153-74.
11. Converse L, Barrett K, Rich E, Reschovsky J. Methods of observing variations in physicians' decisions: the opportunities of clinical vignettes. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30 Suppl 3:586-94.
12. Callegaro M. Social desirability. In: Lavrakas PJ. editor. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Vol 1-0. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008. p. 825-6.
13. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:267-77.
14. Björnsdottir I, Granas AG, Bradley A, Norris P. A systematic review of the use of simulated patient methodology in pharmacy practice research from 2006 to 2016. Int J Pharm Pract 2020;28:13-25.
15. Xu T, de Almeida Neto AC, Moles RJ. A systematic review of simulated-patient methods used in community pharmacy to assess the provision of non-prescription medicines. Int J Pharm Pract 2012;20:307-19.
16. Watson MC, Norris P, Granas AG. A systematic review of the use of simulated patients and pharmacy practice research. Int J Pharm Pract 2006;14:83-93.
17. Caamaño F, Ruano A, Figueiras A, Gestal Otero JJ. Data collection methods for analyzing the quality of the dispensing in pharmacies. Pharm World Sci 2002;24:217-23.
18. Puspitasari HP, Aslani P, Krass I. A review of counseling practices on prescription medicines in community pharmacies. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2009;5:197-210.
19. Bardage C, Westerlund T, Barzi S, Bernsten C. Non-prescription medicines for pain and fever--A comparison of recommendations and counseling from staff in pharmacy and general sales stores. Health Policy 2013;110:76-83.
20. Atkinson J. Heterogeneity of pharmacy education in Europe. Pharmacy 2014;2:231-43.
21. OECD. Health at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020.
22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
23. Pieper D, Mathes T, Palm R, Hoffmann F. How do authors of systematic reviews restrict their literature searches, when only studies from germany should be included? Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2016;117:1-8.
24. Wohlin C. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Association for computing machinery. editor. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE ’14). New York, NY, USA; 2014. p. 1-10.
25. CRD–Centre for reviews and dissemination. Systematic Reviews. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care, CRD, University of York, Layerthorpe; 2009. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
26. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). Br Med J Open 2016;6:e011458.
27. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
28. DtGV–Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verbraucherstudien mbH. [German association for consumer studies] Pharmacy Study 2012: Audit of the quality of service 09/2012, Berlin, DtGV; 2012. Available from: uploads/sites/4/2012/10/120910_DtGV-Test-Apothekenkooperationen_2012_kurz.pdf. [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
29. Stiftung Warentest. Mehr schlecht als recht. [More bad than good.] test; 2004. p. 91-100.
30. Stiftung Warentest. Falsch beraten. [Bad advice.] test; 2008. p. 84-9.
31. Stiftung Warentest. Bittere Pillen. [Bitter pills.] test; 2010. p. 80-91.
32. Stiftung Warentest. Mit Risiken und Nebenwirkungen. [With risks and side effects.] test; 2014. p. 88-97.
33. Berger K, Sauerwein C, Schulz M. Venöse Insuffizienz. Evidenzbasierte Beratung in Apotheken. [Venous insufficiency. Evidence-based advice in pharmacies.] Pharm Ztg 2005;150:4580-1.
34. Berger K, Sauerwein C, Schulz M. Pseudo-Customer-Konzept. Verbesserung der Beratung in Sachsen. [Pseudo-customer concept. Improvement of consulting in Saxony.] Pharm Ztg 2007;152:3972-4.
35. Eickhoff C, Berger K, Wind S, Schulz M. Beratungschecks. Unangekündigter Besuch. [Consulting checks. Unannounced visit.] Pharm Ztg 2005;150:3294-5.
36. Berger K, Eickhoff C, Schulz M. Counselling quality in community pharmacies: implementation of the pseudo customer methodology in germany. J Clin Pharm Ther 2005;30:45-57.
37. Alte D, Weitschies W, Ritter CA. Evaluation of consultation in community pharmacies with mystery shoppers. Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:1023-30.
38. Langer B, Bull E, Burgsthaler T, Glawe J, Schwobeda M, Simon K. Using the simulated patient methodology to assess counselling for acute diarrhoea-evidence from Germany. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2016;112:19-26.
39. Langer B, Bull E, Burgsthaler T, Glawe J, Schwobeda M, Simon K. Assessment of counselling for acute diarrhoea in german pharmacies: a simulated patient study. Int J Pharm Pract 2018;26:310-7.
40. Langer B, Kieper M, Laube S, Schramm J, Weber S, Werwath A. Assessment of counselling for acute diarrhoea in North-Eastern german pharmacies–a follow-up study using the simulated patient methodology. Pharmacol Pharm 2018;9:257-69.
41. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
42. Collins JC, Schneider CR, Naughtin CL, Wilson F, de Almeida Neto AC, Moles RJ. Mystery shopping and coaching as a form of audit and feedback to improve community pharmacy management of non-prescription medicine requests: an intervention study. Br Med J Open 2017;7:e019462.
43. Horvath N, Koder M, Kos M. Using the simulated patient methodology to assess paracetamol-related counselling for headache. PLoS One 2013;7:e52510.
44. Watson MC, Bond CM, Grimshaw J, Johnston M. Factors predicting the guideline compliant supply (or non-supply) of non-prescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:53-7.
45. Chowdhury F, Sturm Ramirez K, Mamun AA, Al Mamun A, Iuliano AD, Chisti MJ, et al. Effectiveness of an educational intervention to improve antibiotic dispensing practices for acute respiratory illness among drug sellers in pharmacies, a pilot study in Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:676.
46. Morris CJ, Cantrill JA, Weiss MC. ‘One simple question should be enough’: consumers’ perceptions of pharmacy protocols. Int J Pharm Pract 1997;5:64-71.
47. Mobark DM, Al-Tabakha MM, Hasan S. Assessing hormonal contraceptive dispensing and counseling provided by community pharmacists in the United Arab Emirates: a simulated patient study. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2019;17:1465.
48. da Rocha CE, Bispo ML, dos Santos AC, Mesquita AR, Brito GC, de Lyra Jr DP. Assessment of community pharmacists' counseling practices with simulated patients who have minor illness: a pilot study. Simul Healthc 2015;10:227-38.
49. Brata C, Marjadi B, Schneider CR, Murray K, Clifford RM. Information-gathering for self-medication via Eastern Indonesian community pharmacies: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:8.
50. Zawahir S, Lekamwasam S, Aslani P. Community pharmacy staff's response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019;8:60.
51. Khojah HMJ, Abdalla AME. Do community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia provide medication-related information to nonbuyers? A Mysterious Shopper Survey Pharmacol Pharm 2019;10:169-76.
52. Rhodes KV, Miller FG. Simulated patient studies: an ethical analysis. Milbank Q 2012;90:706-24.
53. Ibrahim MIM, Awaisu A, Palaian S, Radoui A, Atwa H. Do community pharmacists in qatar manage acute respiratory conditions rationally? A simulated client study. J Pharm Health Serv Res 2018;9:33-9.
54. Fitzpatrick A, Tumlinson K. Strategies for optimal implementation of simulated clients for measuring quality of care in low-and middle-income countries. Glob Health Sci Pract 2017;5:108-14.
55. Kayshap KC, Nissen LM, Smith SS, Kyle G. Management of over-the-counter insomnia complaints in Australian community pharmacies: a standardized patient study. Int J Pharm Pract 2014;22:125-34.
56. Bell DL, Camacho EJ, Velasquez AB. Male access to emergency contraception in pharmacies: a mystery shopper survey. Contraception 2014;90:413-5.
57. Haller S. Beurteilung von Dienstleistungsqualität. Dynamische Betrachtung des Qualitätsurteils im Weiterbildungsbereich [Evaluation of service quality. Dynamic approach to quality evaluation in the continuing education sector.]. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag; 1998.
58. Watson MC, Skelton JR, Bond CM, Croft P, Wiskin CM, Grimshaw JM, et al. Simulated patients in the community pharmacy setting–Using simulated patients to measure practice in the community pharmacy setting. Pharm World Sci 2004;26:32-7.
59. Diwan V, Sabde YD, Byström E, de Costa A. Treatment of pediatric diarrhea: a simulated client study at private pharmacies of Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India. J Infect Dev Ctries 2015;9:505-11.
60. Werner JB, Benrimoj SI. Audio taping simulated patient encounters in community pharmacy to enhance the reliability of assessments. Am J Pharm Educ 2008;72:136.
61. Yaacoub SG, Lahoud NA, Francis NJ, Rahme DW, Murr TH, Maison PF, et al. Antibiotic prescribing rate in lebanese community pharmacies: a nationwide patient-simulated study of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2019;9:44-9.
62. StGB–German criminal code in the version of the notification of 13 November 1998 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3322), last amended by Article 1 of the Act dated 3 March 2020 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 431); 2020. Available from: [Last accessed on 14 Apr 2020]
63. Mesquita AR, Lyra Jr DP, Brito GC, Balisa Rocha BJ, Aguiar PM, de Almeida Neto AC. Developing communication skills in pharmacy: a systematic review of the use of simulated patient methods. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:143-8.
64. Watson MC, Cleland J, Inch J, Bond CM, Francis J. Theory-based communication skills training for medicine counter assistants to improve consultations for non-prescription medicines. Med Educ 2007;41:450-9.
65. Gastelurrutia MA, Larranaga B, Garay A, de Asis Echeveste F, Fernandez-Llimos F. Impact of a program to reduce the dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription in spain. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2013;11:185-90.
66. Krishnan HS, Schaefer M. Evaluation of the impact of pharmacist's advice giving on the outcomes of self-medication in patients suffering from dyspepsia. Pharm World Sci 2000;22:102-8.
67. Chong WW, Aslani P, Chen TF. Adherence to antidepressant medications: an evaluation of community pharmacists’ counseling practices. Patient Prefer Adherence 2013;7:813-25.
68. Pan B, Lazarus HM, Gale RP. Microtransplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:1614-20.
69. Maida M, Camilleri S, Manganaro M, Garufi S, Scarpulla G. Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of refractory gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review of the literature. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017;2017:5609647.
70. Osman MT. Nigella sativa has beneficial effect on osteoporosis and bone healing: Is it a fact or fiction? A systematic review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:41-6.
71. Mappangara S, Basir I, Oktawati S, Adam M, Achmad H. Periodontal disease associated with corticosteroid in asthma patients-A systematic review. Int J Appl Pharm 2019;11:68-70.
72. Prabakar J, John J, Arumugham M, Kumar P. Go natural, say no to chemicals-a systematic review on effectiveness of green tea extract containing formulations on dental caries. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2019;12:63-9.
73. Fahira A, Soraya A, Achmadsyah A, Hakim RW. Efficacy and safety of curcuma longa extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Int J Appl Pharm 2019;11:140-5.
74. Permaisuari N, Rahmawati NA, Nusanti S, Thamrin H. Efficacy of high-dose intravenous steroid treatment in methanol-induced optic neuropathy: a systematic review. Int J Appl Pharm 2019;11:97-100.
75. Campillo ISL, Meaney S, McNamara K, O'Donoghue K. Psychological and support interventions to reduce levels of stress, anxiety or depression on women's subsequent pregnancy with a history of miscarriage: an empty systematic review. Br Med J Open 2017;7:e017802.
76. Alajaji WA, Akl EA, Farha A, Jaber WA, AlJaroudi WA. Surgical versus medical management of patients with acute ischemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes 2015;8:712
718 Views | 141 Downloads
How to Cite
KUNOW, C., and B. LANGER. “USING THE SIMULATED PATIENT METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS THE QUALITY OF COUNSELLING IN GERMAN COMMUNITY PHARMACIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FROM 2005 TO 2018”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 10-19, doi:10.22159/ijpps.2021v13i1.40034.
Review Article(s)