EVALUATION OF SAFETY PROFILES OF ANURADHA OIL-AN HERBAL WOUND HEALING FORMULATION IN LABORATORY ANIMALS

Authors

  • Patankar Sb AMAI Trust's ACE Hospital & Research Center, Pune
  • Mujumdar Am ACE Hospital & Research Centre, 32/2a, Erandwana. Pune
  • Sane Rt Guru Nanak Institute of Research
  • Remya U Guru Nanak Institute of Research

Keywords:

Anuradha oil, Dermal toxicity, AcuteSub acute safety, Mucus membrane irritation, Rats Rabbits

Abstract

Objective: To investigate Acute, Sub-acute dermal toxicity, Mucus membrane irritation activity of Anuradha Oil's (AO and AO11) – An herbal formulation having wound healing potential.

Methods: The formulations were derived from Curcuma longa Linn and Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn rhizhomes,  Hamiltonia suaveolens Roxb bark,  Typha angustifolia Linn flowers,  Azadirachta indica A. Juss leaves without/with pig fat (AO and AO11 respectively)mixed in certain proportion using Sesamum indicum Linn oil as a base, manufactured at a GMP certified facility. Acute, sub-acute dermal safety, mucus membrane irritation profiles were studied by OECD guidelines number 434, 410 and 405 in Wistar rats and New Zealand rabbits respectively. For acute study dermal application of 2000 mg/kg single dose and for sub-acute study limit dose protocol of 1000 mg/kg for 28 days was used. For mucus membrane irritation test 0.10 ml dose was used.

Results: In an acute study no local reaction, behavioral changes and mortality was observed at 2000 mg/kg by dermal route till 14 days. In sub-acute study with dermal application of 1000 mg/kg for 28 days, there were no abnormal signs/symptoms at the application site, no difference in body weight, food consumption, hematology/enzyme profiles, urine analysis, relative organ weights and histopathological observations of vital organs in comparison to control animals. Mucus membrane of rabbits showed no evidence of irritation for both oils.

Conclusion: Acute dermal LD50 cut off for AO and AO11was found to be>2000 mg/kg, safe for dermal application for 28 days using the dose of 1000 mg/kg and non-irritant.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Patankar Sb, AMAI Trust's ACE Hospital & Research Center, Pune

UROLOGY

References

Nguyen DT, Orgill DP, Murphy GF. The pathophysiologic basis for wound healing and cutaneous regeneration. In: Biomaterials for Treating Skin Loss. Cambridge/Boca Raton: Woodhead Publishing (UK/Europe) & CRC Press (US); 2009. p. 25-57.

Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg 1998;176(Suppl 2A):26S–38S.

Kranke P, Bennett M, Roeckl-Wiedmann I, Debus S. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds. In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): Kranke, Peter, ed.; 2004.

Deshpande AP, Javalgekar RR, Ranade S. Dravyagun Vidhnyan. Vol. 1&2, Anmol Prakashan, Pune; 2007. p. 2.

Patwardhan B, Vaidya ADB. Natural products drug discovery: Accelerating the clinical candidate development using reverse pharmacology approaches. Indian J Exp Biol 2010;48:220-7.

Joshi YG. Charak Samhita, Vaidyamitra Prakshan. 1st Ed. 2003:1:86, 43.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Guidelines for Acute Dermal Toxicity-Fixed Dose Procedure. Test guideline 434. Draft guideline. [Last accessed 14 May 2004].

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals, Repeated dose dermal toxicity: 21/28 days Studyâ€. Test guideline 410. [Last accessed 12 May 1981].

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals, Acute Eye Irritation/ Corrosion. Test guideline 405. [Last accessed 24 Feb 1987].

Draize J, Woodward G, Calvery O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membrane. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944;82:377-90.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, Test guideline 408, repeated Dose 90-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents; 1995.

CPCSEA guidelines for Laboratory Animal Facility. Annexure 1- Hematological Data of Commomly used Laboratory Animals.

Adeneye AA, Ajagbonna OP, Adeleke TI. Preliminary toxicity and phytochemical studies of the stem bark aqueous extract of Musanga cecropioides in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2006;105:374-9.

Winder CV, Lembke LA, Stephens MD. Comparative bioassay of drugs in Adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats: Flufenamic acid, mefenamic acid and phenylbutazone. Arthritis Rheum 1969;12(Suppl 5):472-82.

Teo S, Stirling D, Thomas S, Hoberman A, Kiorpes A, Khetani V. A 90 day oral gavage toxicity studies of D-methyl penidate and DL methyl penidate in sprague dawley rats. Toxicol 2002;179(Suppl 3):183-96.

Dhumal R, Patil P, Selkar N, Chawda M, Vahlia M, Vanage G. Sub-chronic safety evaluation of Ayurvedic immunostimulant formulation Immuforte in rats in reverse pharmacology. Toxicol Int 2013;20(1):87–94.

Ruszczak Z. Effect of collagen matrices on dermal wound healing. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2003;55(12):1595-611.

Published

01-04-2015

How to Cite

Sb, P., M. Am, S. Rt, and R. U. “EVALUATION OF SAFETY PROFILES OF ANURADHA OIL-AN HERBAL WOUND HEALING FORMULATION IN LABORATORY ANIMALS”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, Apr. 2015, pp. 278-82, https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ijpps/article/view/4438.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)