DOCKING AND CYTOTOXICITY STUDIES OF 2-VINYLCHROMONE DERIVATIVES ON HUMAN BREAST CANCER CELL LINES

  • Swati Kaushik Novel Molecule Synthesis Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201303, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Megha Rikhi Novel Molecule Synthesis Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201303, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Seema Bhatnagar Novel Molecule Synthesis Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201303, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Objective: Estrogen receptor (ER) is over-expressed in 70% of breast cancers. The ER has two isoforms, ERα and ERβ. The ER ligand binding domain (LBD) has been the target for hormone-responsive breast cancer. Due to tissue-specific effects currently available drugs for hormone positive breast cancer presents serious limitation. The dynamic and plastic nature of ER LBD plays a crucial role in ligand design that discriminates between the ER subtypes. Agents that selectively target ER isoform are a formidable challenge to researchers. The chromone scaffold is a privileged scaffold for exploration of anticancer agents. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the anticancer activity of a small library of 2-vinylchromones in human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231.

Methods: The compounds were synthesized by the reported procedures. Docking studies of the substituted 2-vinylchromone was performed using GLIDE tool in Maestro 8.0. The compounds were evaluated for anticancer activity against MCF-7 (ERα positive), MDA-MB-231 (ERβ positive) and MRC-5 (ERα, β negative) cell lines using MTT assay.

Results: The in silico studies indicated that substituted 2-vinylchromones, 1(a-c) and 2(a-b) exhibited comparable docking score at LBD of ERα and ERβ. However, the binding affinity of the compounds for the allosteric binding site in ERβ was negligible. The dose-dependent studies using MTT assay depicted that compounds 1(a-c) and 2(a-b) exhibited anticancer activity in ERα positive cell line MCF-7 as compared to ERβ positive cell line MDA MB 231. The most potent anticancer activity was observed for compound 2b against MCF-7 cells with IC50 value of 15.625 μg/ml.

Conclusion: The present investigation indicated that 2-vinylchromone derivatives exhibited ER isoform selectivity and the presence of bulky group in 2-vinylchromones resulted in significantly higher cytotoxicity in ERα positive cell lines as compared to the ERβ positive cell line.

 

Keywords: Estrogen receptor, 2-vinylchromone, Docking, Anticancer, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Seema Bhatnagar, Novel Molecule Synthesis Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201303, Uttar Pradesh, India

Amity Institute of Biotechnology

Assistant Director

References

1. Marten’s S, Mithofer A. Flavones and flavone synthases. Phytochemistry 2005;66:2399-407.
2. Fernandes E, Carvalho M, Carvalho F, Silva AMS, Santos CMM, Pinto DCGA, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of polyhydroxylated 2-styrylchromones against tert-butyl-hydroperoxide induced toxicity in freshly isolated rat hepatocytes. Arch Toxicol 2003;77:500-3.
3. Kuroda M, Uchida S, Watanabe K, Mimaki K. Chromones from the tubers of eranthis cilicica and their antioxidant activity. Phytochemistry 2009;70:288-93.
4. Gabor M. Anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic properties of flavonoids. Prog Clin Biol Res 1986;213:471-80.
5. Doria G, Romeo C, Forgione A, Sberze P, Tibolla N, Corno ML, et al. Antiallergic agents. III. Substituted trans-2-ethenyl-4-oxo-4H-1-benzopyran-6-carboxylic acids. Eur J Med Chem 1979;14:347-51.
6. Maggioline M, Bonofiglio D, Marisco S, Panno ML, Cenni B, Picard D, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha mediates the proliferative but not the cytotoxic dose-dependent effects of two major phytoestrogens on human breast cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol 2001;60:595-602.
7. Grindlay D, Reynolds T. The aloe vera phenomenon: a review of the properties and modern uses of the leaf parenchyma gel. J Ethnopharmacol 1986;16:117-51.
8. Kuiper GG, Carlsson B, Grandien K, Enmark E, Haggblad J, Nilsson S, et al. Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Endocrinology 1997;138:863-70.
9. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, Van der Saag PT, et al. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 1998;139:4252-63.
10. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, Accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 2004;47:1739-49.
11. Richardson TI, Dodge JA, Wang Y, Durbin JD, Krishnan V, Norman BH. Benzopyrans as selective estrogen receptor beta agonists (SERBAs). Part 5: Combined A-and C-ring structure-activity relationship studies. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007;17:5563-6.
12. Wang Y, Chirgadze NY, Briggs SL, Khan S, Jensen EV, Burris TP. A second binding site for hydroxytamoxifen within the coactivator-binding groove of estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006;103:9908-11.
13. Shiau AK, Barstad D, Loria PM, Cheng L, Kushner PJ, Agard DA, et al. The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell 1998;95:927-37.
14. Petit FG, Valotaire Y, Pakdel F. The analysis of chimeric human/rainbow trout estrogen receptors reveals amino acid residues outside of P-and D-boxes important for the transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:2634-42.
15. Pike AC, Brzozowski AM, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Thorsell AG, Engstrom O, et al. Structure of the ligand-binding domain of estrogen receptor beta in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist. EMBO J 1999;18:4608–18.
16. Katzenellenbogen JA, Muthyala R, Katzenellenbogen BS. The nature of the ligand-binding pocket of estrogen receptor alpha and beta: the search for subtype-selective ligands and implications for the prediction of estrogenic activity. Pure Appl Chem 2003;75:2397-403.
17. Sun A, Moore TW, Gunther JR, Kim MS, Rhoden E, Du Y, et al. Discovering small-molecule estrogen receptor α/coactivator binding inhibitors: high-throughput screening, ligand development, and models for enhanced potency. ChemMedChem 2011;6:654-66.
18. Manas ES, Xu ZB, Unwalla RJ, Somers WS. Understanding the selectivity of genistein for human estrogen receptor-beta using X-ray crystallography and computational methods. Structure 2004;12:2197-207.
19. Poluzzi E, Piccinni C, Raschi E, Rampa A, Recanatini M, Ponti FD. Phytoestrogens in postmenopause: the state of the art from a chemical, pharmacological and regulatory perspective. Curr Med Chem 2014;21:417-36.
20. Kojetin DJ, Burris TP, Jensen EV, Khan SA. Implications of the binding of tamoxifen to the coactivator recognition site of the estrogen receptor. Endocr-Relat Cancer 2008;15:851–70.
21. Weatherman RV, Clegg NJ, Scanlan TS. Differential SERM activation of the estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) at AP-1 sites. Chem Biol 2001;8:427-36.
Statistics
185 Views | 880 Downloads
How to Cite
Kaushik, S., M. Rikhi, and S. Bhatnagar. “DOCKING AND CYTOTOXICITY STUDIES OF 2-VINYLCHROMONE DERIVATIVES ON HUMAN BREAST CANCER CELL LINES”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 7, no. 12, Oct. 2015, pp. 113-7, https://innovareacademics.in/journals/index.php/ijpps/article/view/8496.
Section
Original Article(s)