CONSISTENCY OF WITNESSES IN NOTARY OFFICIAL AND PPAT
Keywords:Instrumenter witness, Authentic official, Disputing
In making an Akta Autentik (Authentic Official) made by a Notary and a Land Official Making Officer or what is called a PPAT which is the authority, it consists of several parts and one of the things that must be in the Authentic Official section is a witness, which is defined as an identifier witness and an instrumenter witness. Instrumenter witness is a mandatory thing with a minimum number of two people who must have the status as employees in the related PPAT Notary Office, their important existence makes many considerations that must be taken if they have to replace one or both of them, including when the PPAT Notary cooperates with freelancers who require it become an instrumenter witness, but often the PPAT Notary does not know the legal actions and the actual identity in the draft official, he receives from the freelancer which creates a gap to create a dispute, besides that, another loss received by the Notary and PPAT is that his credibility is starting to be doubted. This study aims to find out what and what effect it has on the consistency of instrumenter witnesses in an Authentic Official, this study uses a normative juridical research method by comparing das sein and das sollen about instrumenter witnesses in an Authentic Official, in which the results of research on the consistency of complementary witnesses can lead to a a dispute because the PPAT Notary in making or signing the official does not meet directly with the interested parties which can injure the making and meaning of the Authentic Official definition and is at high risk for the Notary and the PPAT itself. Therefore, with this writing, it is expected that Notaries and PPATs who have been or are new and will be actively serving to be able to be careful in carrying out their duties and positions, especially in the inclusion of witnesses in the official, including to cooperate with freelancers.
Anggelina NP. The legal position of the instrument witness regarding the authenticity of the notary’s act. Acta Comitas Publisher 2019;3:511-22.
Aribowo AN. Legal certainty on the sale and urchase agreement deed in before a notary without the presence of witnesses. Surya Kencana Journal One Dynamics of Law and Justice Issues 2020;11:85.
Dwinanda L. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Instrumenter Dalam Akta Notaris Yang Aktanya Menjadi Objek Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan. In Tesis; 2016.
Hendra R. The notary’s responsibility for the authentic deed facing him false identity. Journal of Riau Legal Studies 2012;2: 11.
Khairulnas. The value of witnesses in the notary deed. Renvoi magazine, 16. 2014.
LPSK. 2010. Available from: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/saksi- dan-korban-cl489 [Last accessed on 2022 Aug ???]
Mulyanto TD 2022. Discussion of reasons for rejection making an authentic deed by a Notary. (M. W. Nugroho, Interviewer).
Nathasya, H. et al. (2012) Hanna nathasya rumia hutapea 1 kedudukan saksi instrumenter dalam pembuatan akta notaris dalam hukum nasional hanna nathasya rumia hutapea, pp. 1–14
Hutapea HN. Position of Instrumental Witness in Making Deed Notary in National Law. The University Institut Repository. 2015;11-23.
Notodisoerjo RS. Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Rajawali; 1999.
Parlindungan ST. Examination of witnesses in criminal cases based on ius Indonesian continent. Journal of Legal Ideas 2021;3:45-58.
Prihardiati RR. The legal theory of development between das sein and das sollen. Hermeneutics 2021;5:84-97.
Salim H. Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu Konsep Teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada; 2015.
Simanjuntak PN. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana; 2014.
Sujanayasa IK, Ibrahim R, Ariawan IG. Position of witness instrument notary deed in relation to article 16 paragraph (1) law number 30 of 2004 concerning the position of notary. Acta Comitas. 2016;1: 1-13.
Sutrisno. Review of the Notary Office Act. Meda. 2007.
Tobing GL. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga; 1992.
Utomo HI, Safi’i I. Tanggung jawab mantan karyawan notaris sebagai saksi akta terhadap kerahasian akta. Res Judicata 2019;2:213-26.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 MUKHANET WAHYU NUGROHO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.