MANAGEMENT OF TEA (CAMELLIA SINENSIS) DISEASES WITH APPLICATION OF MICROBES: A REVIEW

Authors

  • KISHOR CHAND KUMHAR Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India.
  • AZARIAH BABU Tea Research Association, North Bengal Regional Research and Development Centre, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India.
  • SAM NIRMALA NISHA Department of Biotechnology, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala Research and Development Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2022.v10i2.44271

Keywords:

Organic tea, diseases, microbes, Trichoderma, Bacillus, Pseudomonas

Abstract

Tea (Camellia spp.) is one of the most economically important plantation crops and the second-largest non-alcoholic beverage in the world next to water being consumed by people in different forms. It is cultivated mainly in Assam, West Bengal covering the regions such as Darjeeling, Dooars, Terai, and South India in about 6.36 lakh hectares with a production of about 1338 million Kg made teas. Darjeeling tea is world famous for its specific aroma and flavor whereas Assam is known for premier CTC teas. Among various challenges encountered on its bountiful production and desired quality, the occurrence of numerous diseases is one of the major factors. Different fungal and one algal genus are considered as the major phytopathogens to cause leaf, stem, and root diseases. Blight (blister, gray, and brown), dieback, charcoal stem rot, root rot (brown and violet), and black rot are the major threat to tea sustainability. These diseases can be managed through the timely adoption of good agricultural practices. For the past couple of decades, due to the increased awareness about the adverse effects of synthetic fungicides usage, people have been looking for ideal alternative strategies to take care of tea diseases in India under the organic production system. Microbes such as genus Trichoderma, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Actinomycetes are capable of providing a protective umbrella to this crop against different diseases.

References

Vipal AP. Tea production in India: Challenges and opportunities. J Tea Sci Res 2016. [Doi: 10.5376/jtsr.2016.06.0005].

Anonymous. Tea Board India 2018. Available from: http://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/Area_1_pdf2863.pdf/Production_Region_wise_ pdf2736.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 04].

Anonymous. ITC Supplement to Annual Bulletin of Statistics; 2020.

Pandit MK, Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Bhaskar A, Brook BW. Unreported yet massive deforestation driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv 2007;16:153-63.

Pandey AK, Sinniah GD, Babu A, Tanti A. How the global tea industry copes with fungal diseases – Challenges and opportunities. Plant Dis 2021;105:1868-79.

Das GM. Pests of Tea in North East India and Their Control. Jorhat, Assam: Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association; 1965.

Barthakur BK. Recent approach of tocklai to plant protection in tea in north east India. Sci Cult 2011;77:381-4.

Sarmah SR, Bhattacharyya PN, Barooah AK. Microbial biocides-viable alternatives to chemicals for tea disease management. J Biol Control 2020;34:144-52.

Kumhar KC, Babu A. Economically important diseases of tea (Camellia sp.) and their management. In: Diseases of Fruits and Vegetable Crops. New York: Apple Academic Press; 2020. p. 435-59.

Sen S, Rai M, Das D, Chandra S, Acharya K. Blister blight a threatened problem in tea industry: A review. J King Saud Univ Sci 2020;32:3265-72.

McRae W. A Report on the outbreak of blister blight of tea in Darjeeling District. Bullet Agric Res Inst Pusa 1910;18:1-20.

Venkata Ram CS. Plant protection problems in tea – Blister blight control in Southern India. Plant Prot Bull 1964;16:1-12.

de Weille GA. Blister blight control in connection with climatic and weather conditions. Arch Tea Cultiv 1959;20:1-116.

Gulati A, Gulati A, Ravindranath SD, Chakrabarty DN. Economic yield losses caused by Exobasidium vexans in tea plantations. Indian Phytopathol 1993;46:155-9.

Rajalakhsmi N, Ramarethinam S. The role of Exobasidium vexans Massee in flavonoid synthesis by Camellia assamica Shneider. J Plant Crop 2000;28:19-29.

Albersheim P, Jones TM, English PD. Biochemistry of the cell wall in relation to infective processes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1969;7:171-94.

Subba Rao MK. Blister blight of tea in South India. Tech Bull UPASI Tea Sci Dep 1946;4:13.

Balasubramanian S, Parathiraj S, Haridas P. Effect of vermicompost based Trichoderam (Vermiderma) on the recovery of pruned bushes and on the control of certain disease in tea (Camelliasinensis (L) O. Kuntze.). J Plant Crop 2006;34:512.

Saravanakumar D, Vijayakumar C, Kumar N, Samiyappan R. PGPR-induced defense responses in the tea plant against blister blight disease. Crop Prot 2007;26:556-65.

Herman MA, Nault BA, Smart CD. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on bell pepper production and green peach aphid infestations in New York. Crop Prot 2008;27:996-1002.

Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 2004;94:1259-66.

Patten CL, Glick BR. Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:3795-801.

Sowndhararajan K, Marimuthu S, Manian S. Integrated control of blister blight disease in tea using the biocontrol agent Ochrobactrum anthropi strain BMO-111 with chemical fungicides. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:1491-9.

Sanjay R, Ponmurugan P, Baby UI. Evaluation of fungicides and biocontrol agents against grey blight disease of tea in the field. Crop Prot 2008;27:689-94.

Muraleedharan N, Chen ZM. Pests and diseases of tea and their management. J Plant Crop 1997;25:15-43.

Worapong J, Inthararaungsorn S, Strobel GA, Hess WM. A new record of Pestalotiopsis theae, existing as an endophyte on Cinnamomum iners in Thailand. Mycotaxon 2003;88:365-72.

Joshi SD, Sanjay R, Baby UI, Mandal AK. Molecular characterization of Pestalotiopsis spp. associated with tea (Camelliasinensis) in southern India using RAPD and ISSR markers. Indian J Biotechnol 2009;8:377-83.

Horikawa T. Yield Loss of New Tea Shoots Due to Tea Gray Blight Caused by Pestalotialongiseta Spegazzini 1986; 1986. Available from: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=JP880195988 [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 08].

Kuberan T, Vidhyapallavi RS, Balamurugan A, et al. Isolation and biocontrol potential of phylloplane Trichoderma against Glomerella cingulata in tea. Int J Agric Technol 2012;8:1039-50.

Kumhar KC, Babu A, Bordoloi M, Benarjee P, Rajbongshi H. Comparative bioefficacy of fungicides and Trichoderma spp. against Pestalotiopsistheae, causing grey blight in tea (Camellia sp.): An in vitro study. Int J Curr Res Biosci Plant Biol 2016;3:20-7.

Kumhar KC, Babu A. Biocontrol potency of Trichoderma isolates against tea (Camellia sp.) pathogens and their susceptibility towards fungicides. Int J Chem Stud 2019;7:4192-5.

Premkumar R, Baby UI, Balamurugan A. Potential of phylloplane bacteria in the biological control of grey blight disc: ISCof tcu. New York: Apple Academic Press; 2005. p. 109-14.

Jeyaraman M, Robert PS. Bio efficacy of indigenous biological agents and selected fungicides against branch canker disease of (Macrophoma theicola) tea under field level. BMC Plant Biol 2018;18:222.

Jeyaraman M, Robert PS. Integrated management of branch canker disease (Macrophoma sp.) in tea under field level. J Plant Dis Prot 2017;124:115-9.

Kumhar KC, Babu A. In vitro study on bio-efficacy, fungicide tolerance and shelf life of local isolate of Trichoderma viride. Two Bud 2015;62:17-20.

Kumhar KC, Babu A, Arulmarianathan JP, Deka B, Bordoloi M, Rajbongshi H, et al. Role of beneficial fungi in managing diseases and insect pests of tea plantation. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 2020;30:78.

Jagadish Babu D, John Peter A, Babu A, Maiyappan S, Kumhar KC, Bhadra Murthy V. Selection of native Trichoderma isolates for the management of soil-borne diseases in tea (Camelliasinensis). Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci 2017;19:968-74.

Kumhar KC, Azariah B, Asif A. Potential of Trichoderma (KBN-24) against Fusariumsolani. Tocklai News 2014;22:3.

Mishra BK, Mishra RK, Mishra RC, Tiwari AK, Singh RY, Dikshit A. Biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma viride isolates against fungal plant pathogens causing disease in Vignaradiata L. Arch Appl Sci Res 2011;3:361-9.

Hazarika DK, Phookan AK, Saikia GK, Borthakur BK, Sarma D. Management of charcoal stump rot of tea with bio control agents. J Plant Crop 2000;28:149-53.

Elango V, Manjukarunambika K, Ponmurugan P, Marimuthu S. Evaluation of Streptomyces spp. for effective management of Poriahypolateritia causing red root-rot disease in tea plants. Biol Control 2015;89:75-83.

Dutta P, Bhuyan RP, Sharma P. Deployment of Trichoderma for the Management of Tea Diseases. New York: Apple Academic Press; 2020. p. 221-50.

Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN, Basnet M, Chakraborty AP. Evaluation of Ochrobactrum anthropi TRS-2 and its talc based formulation for enhancement of growth of tea plants and management of brown root rot disease. J Appl Microbiol 2009;107:625-34.

Natesan K, Ponmurugan P, Gnanamangai BM, Manigandan V, Joy SP, Jayakumar C, et al. Biosynthesis of silica and copper nanoparticles from Trichoderma, Streptomyces and Pseudomonas spp. evaluated against collar canker and red root-rot disease of tea plants. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 2021. [doi: 10.1080/03235408.2020.1817258].

Ponmurugan P, Manjukarunambika K, Elango V, Gnanamangai BM. Antifungal activity of biosynthesised copper nanoparticles evaluated against red root-rot disease in tea plants. J Exp Nanosci 2016;11:1019-31.

Dhar Purkayastha G, Mangar P, Saha A, Saha D. Evaluation of the biocontrol efficacy of a Serratia marcescens strain indigenous to tea rhizosphere for the management of root rot disease in tea. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191761.

Published

27-03-2022

How to Cite

KUMHAR, K. C., BABU, A., & NISHA, S. N. (2022). MANAGEMENT OF TEA (CAMELLIA SINENSIS) DISEASES WITH APPLICATION OF MICROBES: A REVIEW. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(2), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2022.v10i2.44271

Issue

Section

Review Article(s)