Brooding practices of local chicken producers and on station evaluation of novel brood nest on hatchability of chicken egg at Gamo zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia


  • Mekete Manjura Suntebo Arbaminch Agricultural Research Center P.O Box -06, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia.


Fertility Checking, Breaking Broodiness Behavior, Bedding, Egg Setting Materials


A survey was conducted at Gamo Zone of SNNPR Ethiopia, to asses indigenous practices of incubation, brooding, egg selection practices, broody hen selection practices and causes of hatchability failure. Multi stage sampling procedures were employed to select weredas, sample kebeles and respondents in which two districts were selected by purposive sampling technique; stratified purposive techniques were employed to select nine sample kebeles and purposive random sampling techniques were used to select a total of 385 respondents. Pretested structured questionnaire and focused group discussion were employed to generate data. All generated survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of SPSS 16. Broody hens were the sole means of egg incubation and chick brooding. Broody hens selected based on plumage color, egg yield, body weight (size) and mothering ability. Eggs Laid at home was the predominant sources of incubation and selected mainly based on egg type, egg age and egg size. Clay pots, plastic, bamboo cages and cartons were used as egg setting materials and grasses, straws, cotton seeds, feather of broody hens and  clothes were used as bedding materials. October to December were the most preferred while July to September was the worst months of the year to incubate eggs and to achieve best hatchability eggs. Environmental temperature, lack of proper laying nest and post handling were the critical causes of failure of egg hatchability in the study area. The total number of eggs incubated using a novel nest was 16 eggs.  A comparatively high number of chicks were hatched during the second phase (7-12) from the number of eggs set.  There is a strong need for training of chicken producers in increasing hatchability performances through preparation of proper brooding nest or laying nest, egg selection, feeding, housing, health care, proper post handling and chick management to increase their economic returns. Community based holistic improvement programs is also very imperative to design in order  to improve the genetic potential through selective breeding and conservation of the indigenous chicken genetic resources. Further research on hatchability performance evaluation of the indigenous chickens in both on farm and station as well as effect of the twelve months of the year on incubation and hatchability of eggs.


Addisu, H., Hailu, M. & Zewdu, W. (2013).Indigenous Chicken Production System and Breeding Practice in North Wollo, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Poult Fish Wild Sci., 1:108.

Amsalu, A. (2003). Practical Poultry Training Manual (Unpublished). Amhara Region Agricultural Research Institute, Kombolcha Poultry Research and Multiplication Center.

Bogale, K. (2008). In Situ Characterization of Local Chicken Eco-Type for Functional Traits and Production System in Fogera Woreda, Amhara Regional State.Msc.Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.

Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc

CSA (Centeral Statistics Agency). (2011). Agricultural Sample Survey 2010/11. Statistical Bulletin 2: 505 Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics, Addis Ababa.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2003). Egg Marketing –A Guide for the Production and Sales of Eggs .FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 150, Rome.

Gueye, E. F. (2009). The Role of Networks in Information Dissemination to Family Poultry Farmers .World's Poultry Science Journal, Volume 65: 115-124 Retrieved December 2, 2011, from http://www.fao-

Halima, H. (2007). Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Populations in Northwest Ethiopia. PhD Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

HARC (Humera Agricultural Research Center). (2013). Annual Report on land coverage of weredas in Western Zone of Tigray (Unpublished).

Kingori, A.M. (2011). Review of the Factors that Influence Egg Quality and Hatchability in Poultry.

International Journal of poultry science, 10(6):483-492.

Martin, H., Frands, D. & Robyn, A. (2011).Products and Profit from Poultry.FAO Diversification Booklet 3.Second Edition. Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Italy, Pp 1-14.

Matiwos, H., Negassi, A.., & Solomon, D. (2013). Production Performance of Local and Exotic Breeds of Chicken at Rural Household Level in Nole Kabba Woreda, Western Wollega, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(11): 1014–1021.

Mekonnen H., Kalayou, S., Kyule, M., Asfaha, M. & Belihu, K. (2011). Effect of Brucella Infection on Reproduction Conditions of Female Breeding Cattle and Its Public Health Significance in Western Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Veterinary medicine international. 354943. doi:10.4061/2011/354943

Meseret, M. (2010).Characterization of Village Poultry Production and Marketing System in Gomma Wereda, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia.MSc.Thesis submitted to the school of graduate of Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Nebiyu, Y., Brhan, T. & Kelay, B. (2013). Characterization of Village Chicken Production Performance under Scavenging System in Halaba District of Southern Ethiopia.Ethiop.Vet.J., 17 (1):69-80.

Nigussie, D. (2011).Breeding Programs for indigenous chickens of Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University.

Nigussie, D., Tadelle, D., Liesbeth, H., van der, W., Johan AM, van A. (2010). Production objectives and trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia: implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing indigenous chicken genetic resources .Trop Anim Health prod., 42:1519-1529.

Raji, A.O., Aliyu, J., Igwebuike, J.U. & Chiroma,S. (2009). Effect of Storage Methods and Time on Egg Quality Traits of Laying Hens in a Hot Dry Climate.ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science ,Vol 4(4):1-7.

Rulz, J., Lunam, C., Groves, P.J. & Glatz. (2001).Effect of Storage Temperature and Duration on Hatchability Proc. Aust.Poult.Sci.Sym.13.

RSHD (Rural Self-Help Development Agency). (2011). The Study on Socio-Economic Status of Village Chickens at Ha Molemane (Berea), Phamong (Mohales’ Hoek), Tebang, Ha Notsi, and Ribaneng (Mafeteng) of Lesotho. Maseru, Lesotho. P.111.

Samson, L. & Endalew, B. (2010). Survey on Village Chicken Production and Utilization System in Mid Rift Valley Of Oromia, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 5(4):198-203.

Solomon, Z., Binyam, K., Bilatu, A. & Ferede, A.(2013).Village Chicken Production Systems in Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(9):256-262.

SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). (2007). SPSS for windows. User’s guide: Statistics version 16. Inc. Cary, NC.

Tadelle, D., Million T., Alemu, Y. & Peters, K.J. (2003).Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 1. Flock characteristics and performance. Journal of Livestock Research Rural Development, 15.



How to Cite

Mekete Manjura Suntebo. (2023). Brooding practices of local chicken producers and on station evaluation of novel brood nest on hatchability of chicken egg at Gamo zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(3). Retrieved from



Original Article(s)