BROODING PRACTICES OF LOCAL CHICKEN PRODUCERS AND ON-STATION EVALUATION OF NOVEL BROOD NEST ON HATCHABILITY OF CHICKEN EGG AT GAMO ZONE, SNNPR, ETHIOPIA

Authors

  • MEKETE MANJURA SUNTEBO Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2023.v11i3.46588

Keywords:

Fertility Checking, Breaking Broodiness Behavior, Bedding, Egg Setting Materials

Abstract

A survey was conducted at Gamo Zone of SNNPR, Ethiopia, to assess the indigenous practices of incubation, brooding, egg selection practices, broody hen selection practices, and causes of hatchability failure. Multistage sampling procedures were employed to select woredas, sample kebeles, and respondents, in which two districts were selected by purposive sampling technique; stratified purposive techniques were employed to select nine sample kebeles, and purposive random sampling techniques were used to select a total of 385 respondents. Pretested structured questionnaire and focused group discussion were employed to generate data. All generated survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of SPSS 16. Broody hens were the sole means of egg incubation and chick brooding. Broody hens are selected based on plumage color, egg yield, body weight (size), and mothering ability. Eggs laid at home were the predominant sources of incubation and were selected mainly based on egg type, egg age, and egg size. Clay pots, plastic, bamboo cages, and cartons were used as egg-setting materials, and grasses, straws, cotton seeds, feathers of broody hens, and clothes were used as bedding materials. October–December was the most preferred while July–September was the worst months of the year to incubate eggs and to achieve the best hatchability eggs. Environmental temperature, lack of proper laying nests, and post handling were the critical causes of the failure of egg hatchability in the study area. The total number of eggs incubated using a novel nest was 16 eggs. A comparatively high number of chicks were hatched during the second phase (7–12) from the number of eggs set. There is a strong need for training of chicken producers in increasing hatchability performances through the preparation of proper brooding nest or laying nest, egg selection, feeding, housing, health care, proper post handling, and chick management to increase their economic returns. Community-based holistic improvement programs are also very imperative to design to improve the genetic potential through selective breeding and conservation of the indigenous chicken genetic resources. Further research on hatchability performance evaluation of the indigenous chickens both on-farm and station as well as the effect of the 12 months of the year on incubation and hatchability of eggs.

References

Addisu H, Hailu M, Zewdu W. Indigenous chicken production system and breeding practice in North Wollo, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Poult Fish Wild Sci 2013;1:108.

Amsalu A. Practical Poultry Training Manual (Unpublished). Ethiopia: Amhara Region Agricultural Research Institute, Kombolcha Poultry Research and Multiplication Center; 2003.

Bogale K. In situ Characterization of Local Chicken Eco-Type for Functional Traits and Production System in Fogera Woreda, Amhara Regional State. Msc. Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia; 2008

Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1963.

CSA Centeral Statistics Agency. Agricultural Sample Survey 2010/11. Statistical Bulletin 2: 505 Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics, Addis Ababa; 2011.

Dana N, van der Waaij LH, Dessie T, van Arendonk JA. Production objectives and trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia: Implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing indigenous chicken genetic resources.Trop Anim Health Prod 2010;42:1519-29.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Egg Marketing-A Guide for the Production and Sales of Eggs. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 150. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2003.

Gueye EF. The role of networks in information dissemination to family poultry farmers. Worlds Poult Sci J 2009;65:115-24.

Halima H. Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Populations in Northwest Ethiopia. PhD Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; 2007.

HARC (Humera Agricultural Research Center). Annual Report on land Coverage of Weredas in Western Zone of Tigray (Unpublished). Ethiopia: HARC Humera Agricultural Research Center; 2013.

Kingori AM. Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchability in poultry. Int J Poult Sci 2011;10:483-92.

Martin H, Frands D, Robyn A. Products and Profit from Poultry. FAO Diversification Booklet 3. 2nd ed. Rural Infrastructure and Agro- Industries Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Italy; 2011. p. 1-14.

Matiwos H, Negassi A, Solomon D. Production performance of local and exotic breeds of chicken at rural household Level in Nole Kabba Woreda, Western Wollega, Ethiopia. Afr J Agric Res 2013;8:1014-21.

Mekonnen H, Kalayou S, Kyule M, Asfaha M, Belihu K. Effect of brucella infection on reproduction conditions of female breeding cattle and its public health significance in Western Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Vet Med Int 2011;2011:354943.

Meseret M. Characterization of Village Poultry Production and Marketing System in Gomma Wereda, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate of Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia; 2010.

Nebiyu Y, Brhan T Kelay B. Characterization of village chicken Production performance under scavenging System in Halaba District of Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J 2013;17:69-80.

Nigussie D. Breeding Programs for indigenous chickens of Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University; 2011.

Raji AO, Aliyu J, Igwebuike JU, Chiroma S. Effect of storage methods and time on egg quality traits of laying hens in a hot dry climate. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 2009;4:1-7.

RSHD (Rural Self-Help Development Agency). The Study on Socio- Economic Status of Village Chickens at Ha Molemane (Berea), Phamong (Mohales’ Hoek), Tebang, Ha Notsi, and Ribaneng (Mafeteng) of Lesotho. Maseru, Lesotho; 2011. p. 111.

Rulz J, Lunam C, Groves PJ, Glatz. Effect of storage temperature and duration on hatchability. Proc Aust Poult Sci Sym 2001;13: ???.

Samson L, Endalew B. Survey on village chicken production and utilization system in mid rift valley of Oromia, Ethiopia. Glob Vet 2010;5:198-203. Solomon Z, Binyam K, Bilatu A, Ferede, A. Village chicken production systems in Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Wudpecker J Agric Res 2013;2:256-62.

SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). SPSS for Windows. User’s Guide: STATISTICS Version 16. Cary, North Carolina: Inc.; 2007.

Tadelle D, Million T, Alemu, Y, Peters KJ. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 1. Flock characteristics and performance. J Livestock Res Rural Dev 2003;15: ???.

Published

01-05-2023

How to Cite

SUNTEBO, M. M. (2023). BROODING PRACTICES OF LOCAL CHICKEN PRODUCERS AND ON-STATION EVALUATION OF NOVEL BROOD NEST ON HATCHABILITY OF CHICKEN EGG AT GAMO ZONE, SNNPR, ETHIOPIA. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(3), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2023.v11i3.46588

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)