THE ROLE OF NEEDLE IN FORMULATION OF pH SENSITIVE SWELLABLE MICROBEADS PREPARED WITH HYDROPHILIC POLYMERS FOR ATORVASTATIN AND THEIR CHARACTERIZATION STUDIES
Objective: The aim of the study was to develop and characterize mucoadhesive microbeads for oral sustained release of atorvastatin by using hydrophilic polymers and application of different process variables in designing of pH sensitive swellable microbeads.
Methods: Microbeads were prepared by ionic gelation method. The compatibility studies of atorvastatin with polymers were investigated by differential scanning calorimeter and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies. In this work process variable like optimization of curing agents and their quantity, effect of rpm, and their influence in drug entrapment were studied. Prepared beads were characterized for particle size, swelling index, erosion studies and drug release studies.
Results: Mixture of alginate and carbopol 934 P at 3.3 % w/v shows sustained release and good mucoadhesive capacity. Furthermore, drug loading and swelling increased with the use of a combination of polymers. On basis of in vitro release studies and swelling studies, it was observed that sodium alginate coated with carbopol 934 P showed sustained release of 84.5 % at end of 10 h in 6.8 phosphate buffer. The optimised batch followed peppas and higuchi release mechanism and releasing the drug by non-fickian transport.
Conclusion: The alginate beads with a combination of carbopol 934P showed a sustain release pattern. The release rate and swelling of atorvastatin beads could be adjusted by adding other hydrophilic polymers or by optimising curing agents, curing time and their volume. The zero order of drug release was confirmed for all the batches. The in vitro data was better fit to Higuchiâ€™s diffusion model and diffusion rate limited.
2. Shivendra Agarwal, Faraz Zamil, Lokendra Singh, Amit Saxena. Formulation and evaluation of floating beads of diltiazem HCL. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2016;4:38-42.
3. Sriamornsak P, Nunthanid J, Luangtana-anan M, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Alginate-based pellets prepared by extrusion/spheronization: A preliminary study on the effect of additive in granulating liquid. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;67:227â€“35.
4. Nethaji R, Shareef S, Palanivelu M, Surendiran SN, Ganesan B. Formulation and evaluation of propranolol hydrochloride microspheres by ionic gelation technique. Int J Pharm Chem Biol Sci 2015;5:407-16.
5. Radonjic M, Wielinga P, Verschuren L, Kelder T, Kooistra T. Systems biology analysis unravels the complementary action of combined rosuvastatin and atorvastatin therapy. Pharma-cogenet Genomics 2012;22:837-46.
6. Taha EL, Al Saidan S, Samy AM, Khan MA. Preparation and in vitro characterization of self nanoemulsified drug delivery system of all trans retinol acetate. Int J Pharm 2004;28:109-19.
7. Chowdary DPR, Srinivas L. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: a review of current status. Indian Drugs 2000;37:400-6.
8. Sasre T, Venkitachalam P. Buccoadhesive tablets of nefidipine: standardization of a novel buccoadhesive erodible carrier. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1994;20:3005-14.
9. Kalambe RN, Baviskar DT, Thakare VM, Jadhav SD, Jadhav CM, Tekade BW, et al. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving oral film of levocetirizine dihydrochloride. Int J Pharm Sci 2013;5:337-41.
10. Corsini A, Bellosta S, Baetta R, Fumagalli R, Paoletti R, Bernini F. New insights into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of statins. Pharmacol Ther 1999;84:413â€“28.
11. Raimar L, Jae Seung K, Gordon LA. Pharmacokinetics of an immediate release, a controlled release and a two pulse dosage form in dogs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000;60:17â€“23.
12. Das MK, Senapati PC. Evaluation of furosemide-loaded alginate microspheres prepared by ionotropic external gelation technique. Acta Pol Pharm 2007;64:253-62.
13. Yaddalapudi S, Palla J. Formulation, and evaluation of metformin hydrochloride sustained released microspheres. J Comprehensive Pharm 2014;1:136-41.
14. Chang X, Weng T, Zhao X, Chen H, Gao Z, Yang Y, et al. A study of microemulsion systems for transdermal delivery of triptolide. J Controlled Release 2004;98:427-36.
15. Yadav A, Jain DK. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive microspheres of propranolol hydrochloride for sustained drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Med Sci 2011;1:1-8.
16. Du Pasquier A, Disma F, Bowmer T, Gozdz AS, Amatucci G, Tarascon JM. Differential scanning calorimetry studies of lithium ion and the reactivity of carbon anodes in plastic lithium ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 1998;145:472â€“7.
17. Deshpande RD, Gowda DV, Mahammed N. Design of Pistacia lentiscus (mastic gum) controlled release spheroids and investigating the influence of roll compaction. Industrial Crops Products 2013;44:603-10.
18. Cosijins A, Nizet D, Nikolokakis I. Porous pellets as drug delivery system. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35:655â€“62.
19. Swamy NG, Rupa V, Abbas Z, Dasankoppa FS. Formulation and evaluation of nanosuspensions for enhancing the dissolution of poorly soluble mebendazole. Indian Drugs 2010;47:47-54.
20. Wei H, Qing D, De-Ying C, Bai X, Li-Fang F. In vitro and in vivo studies of pectin/ethylcellulose film-coated pellets of 5-fluorouracil for colonic targeting. J Pharm Pharmacol 2008;60:35â€“44.
21. Surjyanarayan M, Hemangini R, Bhavdip J, Mikesh P, Rajesh KS. Release kinetic modeling of atorvastatin calcium loaded self microemulsifying drug delivery system. Elixir Pharm 2012;53:11725-9.
22. Marzouk AM, Kassem AA, Samy AM, Amer RI. Comparative evaluation of ketoconazole-Î²-cyclodextrin systems prepared by coprecipitation and kneading. Drug Discovery Therapy 2010;4:380-7.
23. Stuart B. Infrared spectroscopy-Fundamental and application, John Wiley and Sons; 2004. p. 46-63.
24. Sathali AAH, Varun J. Formulation, development and in vitro evaluation of candesartan cilexetil mucoadhesive microbeads. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2012;4:109-18.
25. Shahira F, El-Menshawe, Rasha M Kharshoum, Doa S Hamad, Abdelkhalek Halawa. Effect of biodegradable co-polymers and divalent cations on the sustained release ability of propranolol hydrochloride loaded biomaterial. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2011;8:311-7.
26. Abou el Ela AF, Hassan MA, E Maraghy DA. Ketorolac tromethamine floating beads for oral application: characterization and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Saudi Pharm J 2014;22:349-59.
27. Gurpreet Arora, Karan Malik, Inderbir Singh, Sandeep Arora, Vikas Rana. Formulation and evaluation of controlled release matrix mucoadhesive tablets of domperidone using Salvia plebeian gum. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2011;2:163â€“9.
28. Mitra Jelvehgari, Parvin Zakeri-Milani, Fatemeh Khonsari. Comparative study of in vitro release and mucoadhesivity of gastric compacts composed of multiple unit system/bilayered discs using direct compression of metformin hydrochloride. Bioimpacts 2014;4:29â€“38.
29. Nanjwade BK, Parikh KA, Deshmukh RV, Nanjwade VK, Gaikwad KR. Development and evaluation of Intranasal mucoadhesive microspheres of neostigmine bromide. Pharm Anal Acta 2011;2:118.
30. Lin SY, Lin KH, Li MJ. Formulation design of double-layer in the outer shell of the dry-coated tablet to modulate lag time and time-controlled dissolution function: studies on micronized ethylcellulose for dosage form design. AAPS Journal 2004;6:1-6.
31. Neau SH, Howard MA, Claudius JS, Howard DR. The effect of the aqueous solubility of xanthine derivatives on the release mechanism from ethylcellulose matrix tablets. Int J Pharm 1999;179:97-105.
32. Siepmann F, Hoffmann A, Leclercq B, Carlin B, Siepmann J. How to adjust desired drug release patterns from ethylcellulose-coated dosage forms. J Controlled Release 2007;119:182-9.
33. Mortazavi SA, Moghimi HR. Effect of surfactant type and concentration on the duration of mucoadhesion of carbopol 934 and HPMC solid compacts. Iran J Pharm Res 2010;2:191-9.