• K. Y. S. PUTRI Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • ZULHAMRI ABDULLAH Department of Communication, Faculty of Modern Language and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • S. BEKTI ISTIYANTO Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
  • CHINEDU EUGENIA ANUMUDU Department of Communication, Faculty of Modern Language and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia


As a promising area in healthcare research, electronic health (e-health) has received more research attention recently. The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate a proposed conceptual framework for digital health literacy. This conceptual framework is planned as a guide for future studies to use and validated as a foundation for quantitative studies to investigate the e-Health Literacy as perceived by citizens in Asia amid the outback of the world’s high-risk pandemic crisis such as Coronavirus (Covid19). This conceptual analysis applied Technology Acceptance Model as a basis to develop the antecedents of a healthy lifestyle among the citizens of Asian countries. This conceptual paper proposed that Information quality, system quality, and service quality will affect the citizens’ perceived ease of use and their perceived usefulness, which can affect their intention to use e-health and consequently results in a healthy lifestyle among the citizens. This conceptual paper submitted research hypotheses that will be a basis for future researches in Asia and if the framework is validated, recommendations will be offered to various stakeholders on how to improve a healthy lifestyle in Asia. Specifically, the proposed conceptual framework if validated will help policymakers to offer positive policies and procedures for the improvement of thriving healthcare industries in Asia.

Keywords: Healthy lifestyle, Technology Acceptance Model, Information quality, COVID-19, e-health


1. Kanchanachitra C, Lindelow M, Johnston T, Hanvoravongchai P, Lorenzo FM, Huong NL, et al. Human resources for health in Southeast Asia: shortages, distributional challenges, and international trade in health services. Lancet 2011;377:769-81.
2. Fadzil F, Jaafar S, Ismail R. 40 y of Alma Ata Malaysia: targeting equitable access through organizational and physical adaptations in the delivery of public sector primary care. Primary Health Care Res Dev 2020;21:e4.
3. WHO. Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19; 2020.
4. ADB. ADB Approves $3 Million Grant to Support Indonesia's Fight Against COVID-19; 2020.
5. Abdullah JM, Ismail WFNMW, Mohamad I, Ab Razak A, Harun A, Musa KI, et al. A critical appraisal of COVID-19 in Malaysia and Beyond. Malaysian J Med Sci MJMS 2020;27:1-9.
6. Statista. Indonesia: coronavirus (COVID-19) cases; 2020.
7. Robbins T, Hudson S, Ray P, Sankar S, Patel K, Randeva H, et al. COVID-19: A new digital dawn?; 2020.
8. Golinelli D, Boetto E, Carullo G, Landini MP, Fantini MP. How the COVID-19 pandemic is favoring the adoption of digital technologies in healthcare: a rapid literature review. medRxiv; 2020.
9. WHO. eHealth–Using ICT for Better Healthcare; 2015.
10. Yusif S, Hafeez Baig A, Soar J. An exploratory study of the readiness of public healthcare facilities in developing countries to adopt health information technology (HIT)/e-Health: the case of Ghana. J Healthcare Informatics Res 2020;4:189-214.
11. Zobair KM, Sanzogni L, Sandhu K. Expectations of telemedicine health service adoption in rural Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2019;238:112485.
12. Hoque MR, Bao Y, Sorwar G. Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: a patient’s perspective. Informatics Health Social Care 2017;42:1-17.
13. Alakeel SY, Almutairi D, Layqah L. Needs and utilization of drug-information resources of healthcare providers in an academic tertiary care center. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2020;12:124-8.
14. Dimassi H, Makhoul M, Khabsa J, Saadeh M. Trusting the pharmacist in delivering medication information: a community-based perspective Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2020;12:26-31.
15. Nutbeam D. Health promotion glossary. Health Promotion International 1998;13:349-64.
16. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Int Res 2001;2:e20.
17. Prajwal AT, Krishna BSM, Vasantharaju SG. Pharma 4.0–impact of THE internet of things on health care. Int J Appl Pharm 2020;12:64-9.
18. Norman CD, Skinner HA. E-HEALTH: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e27.
19. British Computer Society. BCS digital literacy for life programme; 2017. [Last accessed on 10 Jun 2020]
20. Tubaishat A, Habiballah L. eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today 2016;42:47-52.
21. James DC, Cedric Harville II. Peer-reviewed: eHealth literacy, online help-seeking behavior, and willingness to participate in mHealth chronic disease research among African Americans, Florida, 2014–2015. Preventing Chronic Disease 2016;13: E156.
22. Paige SR. Health promotion and chronic disease prevention with eHealth technology in the general population. In: Nutrition, Fitness, and Mindfulness, Humana, Cham; 2020. p. 225-36.
23. Reder M, Soellner R, Kolip P. Do women with high eHealth literacy profit more from a decision aid on mammography screening? Testing the Moderation Effect of the eHEALS in a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers Public Health 2019;7:46.
24. Shiferaw KB. Validation of the ethiopian version of the eHealth literacy scale (ET-eHEALS) in a population with chronic disease. Risk Management Healthcare Policy 2020;13:465-71.
25. Richtering SS, Morris R, Soh SE, Barker A, Bampi F, Neubeck L, et al. Examination of an eHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: rasch analyses. PLoS One 2017;12:e0175372.
26. Tao D, Wang T, Wang T, Zhang T, Zhang X, Qu X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers Human Behavior 2020;104:106-47.
27. Ziba PW, Kang J. Factors affecting the intention to adopt e-government services in Malawi and the role played by donors. Inf Dev 2020;36:369-89.
28. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319-40.
29. Alam MZ, Hoque MR, Hu W, Barua Z. Factors influencing the adoption of mHealth services in a developing country: a patient-centric study. Int J Inf Management 2020;50:128-43.
30. Davis FD, Venkatesh V. Toward pre-prototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 2004;51:31-46.
31. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inf 2009;78:115-26.
32. Alsharo M, Alnsour Y, Alabdallah M. How habit affects continuous use: evidence from Jordan’s national health information system. Inf Health Soc Care 2020;45:43-56.
33. Kang H, An S. Do websites contain factors to aid older adults’ adoption of health-related information and communication technology? J Communication Healthcare 2020;13:89-101.
34. Kamal SA, Shafiq M, Kakria P. Investigating the acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol Soc 2020;60:101212.
35. Gao L, Waechter KA. Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation. Information Systems Frontiers 2017;19:525-48.
36. Gao L, Waechter KA, Bai X. Understanding consumers’ continuance intention towards mobile purchase: a theoretical framework and empirical study–a case of China. Computers Human Behavior 2015;53:249-62.
37. Thireesha P, Mounika K, Adusumilli PK, Harsha SC. An overview of drug information center–functions and challenges in India. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2020;13:11-5.
38. Silic M, Ruf C. The effects of the elaboration likelihood model on initial trust formation in financial advisory services. Int J Bank Marketing 2018;36:672-90.
39. Zhou T. Understanding the determinants of mobile payment continuance usage. Industrial Management and Data Systems 2014;114:936-48.
40. Delone WH, Mclean ER. Measuring e-commerce success: applying the delone and mclean information systems success model. Int J Electronic Commerce 2004;9:31-47.
41. Sarkar S, Chauhan S, Khare A. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce. Int J Inf Management 2020;50:286-301.
42. Purkayastha HD, Hossian SIK. Nanosuspension: a modern technology used in the drug delivery system. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2019;11:1-3.
43. Mane SR. Advances of Hydrazone linker in polymeric drug delivery. J Crit Rev 2019;6:1-4.
44. Al Thunibat A, Zin NAM, Sahari N. Mobile government user requirements model. J E-Governance 2011;34:104-11.
45. Egea JMO, Gonzalez MVR. Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Computers Human Behavior 2011;27:319-2.
46. Papa A, Mital M, Pisano P, Del Giudice M. E-health and wellbeing monitoring using smart healthcare devices: an empirical investigation. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 2020;153:119226.
47. Jung ML, Loria K. Acceptance of swedish e-health services. J Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2010;3:55.
48. Wilson EV, Lankton NK. Predicting patients' use of provider-delivered e-health: the role of facilitating conditions. In: Patient-centered e-health; 2009. p. 217-29.
49. Alomari M, Woods P, Sandhu K. Predictors for e?government adoption in Jordan. Inf Technol People 2012;25:207-36.
50. Leung L, Chen C. E-health/m-health adoption and lifestyle improvements: exploring the roles of technology readiness, the expectation-confirmation model, and health-related information activities. Telecommunications Policy 2019;43:563-75.
51. Hajishafiee M, Keshteli AH, Saneei P, Feinle Bisset C, Esmaillzadeh A, Adibi P. Healthy lifestyle score and irritable bowel syndrome: a cross?sectional study in adults. Neurogastroenterol Motility 2020;32:e13793.
52. Allman Farinelli M, Partridge SR, McGeechan K, Balestracci K, Hebden L, Wong A, et al. A mobile health lifestyle program for prevention of weight gain in young adults (TXT2BFiT): nine-month outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;4:e78.
53. Van Dijk MR, Huijgen NA, Willemsen SP, Laven JS, Steegers EA, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Impact of an mHealth platform for pregnancy on nutrition and lifestyle of the reproductive population: a survey. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2016;4:e53.
54. 54. Aziz YA, Samdin Z, Awang KW, Abdullah Z. Developing an index for medical tourism International Business Management 2015;9,4:412-415.
55. Abdullah Z. Beyond corporate image: Projecting international reputation management as a new theoretical approach in a transitional country. International Journal of Economics and Management, 2009;3,1:170-183.
56. Ekpe I, Razak RC, Ismail M, Abdullah Z. Entrepreneurial skill acquisition, psychosocial factors and youth’s self-employment in Malaysia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 2016;19,2:78-88.
57. Ekpe I, Razak RC, Ismail M, Abdullah Z. Entrepreneurial skill acquisition and youth’s self-employment in Malaysia: How far? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 2015;6,4:150–154.
58. Abdullah Z. Cultural diversity management in Malaysia: A perspective of communication management, in Özbilgin M, Syed J. Managing cultural diversity in Asia 2010:14–38. Gheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
207 Views | 263 Downloads
How to Cite
Review Article(s)