PHYSIOCHEMICAL, IN-VITRO, EX-VIVO AND IN-VIVO EVALUATION OF TRANSDERMAL PATCHES BASED ON QBD APPROACH: AN OVERVIEW

Authors

  • RUPAL DUBEY School of Pharmacy and Research, People’s University, Bhanpur, Bhopal, M. P., India 462037
  • UMADOSS POTHUVAN School of Pharmacy and Research, People’s University, Bhanpur, Bhopal, M. P., India 462037
  • ARUN KUMAR PANDEY Alkem Laboratories Limited, Mumbai, Maharastra, India 410208
  • BHASKAR KUMER GUPTA School of Pharmacy and Research, People’s University, Bhanpur, Bhopal, M. P., India 462037

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2022.v14ti.20

Keywords:

Transdermal Patch, Physical Evaluation, Physicochemical Property, In-Vitro Transdermal, Ex-Vivo Transdermal, In-Vivo Transdermal

Abstract

There are various forms of prescription drugs available in the market for human and animal purposes, which may be administered for acute or chronic treatment. And a variety of dosage regimens of different dosage forms are found in general, among which one of the treatment modes is the transdermal route. The Transdermal Tract Route is a more accurate way to get into the skin without pain, faster to systemic circulation than the oral route and the drug reaches the systemic circulation in a controlled transmission.

Improving the transdermal system poses an additional challenge to maintain Quality by Design (QbD) with quality, consistency, reproduction, stability and efficiency. With the QbD method of pharmaceutical product production, product quality is considered much faster than waiting until the end to be tested for quality. In essence, this includes determining the sources of the unpredictability that may be contributing to the process. This approach ensures that the causes of quality problems are identified. The main result is a pharmaceutical product manufactured to meet pre-determined quality requirements from the outset.

In essence, this includes determining the sources of the unpredictability that may be contributing to the process. This approach ensures that the causes of quality problems are identified. The main result is a pharmaceutical product manufactured to meet pre-determined quality requirements from the outset.

Critical quality attribute (CQA) and Critical Process Parameters can be used to establish QbD (CPP). During the construction of a transdermal design, it is important to check the various key parameters that help maintain the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) of the drug product.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Labthink. WPO Corporate Partner–water vapor permeability by gravimetric; 2021.

Labthink WPO Corporate Partner-water vapor permeability by infrared; 2021.

Labthink WPO Corporate Partner-water vapor permeability by electrolytic; 2021. http://en.labthink.com/en-us/products/test-property/water-vapor-permeability-tester.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI1I6XleHq5wIVgo2PCh1wSgpYEAAYASAAEgKHofD_BwE#electrolytic.

Labthink. WPO corporate partner-water vapor permeability by humidity; 2021.

General chapters. General tests and assays; 2021. https://online.uspnf.com/uspnf/document/1_guid-ba3755e4-77aa-4deb-8fe2-4fc78c587e9e_1_en-us?source=search%20resultsandhighlight=dose%20uniformity.

Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A. Measuring adhesive performance in transdermal delivery systems. Am J Drug Deliv. 2004;2(3):193-206. doi: 10.2165/00137696-200402030-00004.

Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, Montanari L. The effect of thickness and water content on the adhesive properties of methacrylic patches. Acta Tech Legis Xi. 2000;2:81-92.

Johnston J. Physical testing of pressure-sensitive adhesive systems. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KI, editors. Handbook of adhesive Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1994. p. 93-112.

Kharat R, Bathe RS. A comprehensive review on: transdermal drug delivery systems. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2016;7(4):147-59. doi: 10.7439/ijbar.v7i4.3131.

Rajeckas V. Bond strength and its prognosis. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology II. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1989. p. 115-57.

Mali AD, Bathe R, Patil M. An updated review on transdermal drug delivery systems. Int J of Adv in Sci Res 2015;1(6). doi: 10.7439/ijasr.v1i6.2243.

Kusumdevi V, Asha AN, Agadi SS, Mathew D. Optimization of transdermal delivery of selected antihyper lipidaemic agents-statin. J Drug Deliv Res. 2013;2:1-23.

Pethe AM, Salunkhe SP, Premchandani TA. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablet of simvastatin. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2014;5:268-78.

Riaz U, Nadia S, Kumar BS. Dissolution and dissolution apparatus: a review. Int J Cur Biomed Pharm Res. 2011;1(4):201-7.

Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). EMA/CHMP/QWP/608924/2014; 2014.

Phoenix RDS™ Robotic Diffusion Station user guide. Teledyne Hanson Res. 2018:59-208-98.

Siewert M, Dressman J, Brown CK, Shah VP, FIP, AAPS. FIP/AAPS guidelines to dissolution/in vitro release testing of novel/special dosage forms. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4(1):E7. doi: 10.1208/pt040107, PMID 12916916, PMCID PMC2750303.

Wang Q, Sivakumar K, Mohanasundaram S. Impacts of extrusion processing on food nutritional components. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2022;13(S1):364-74. doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01422-2.

Mamatha T, Venkateswara RJ, Anitha N. Development and physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of transdermal patches of zaleplon. IJPER. 2013;47(4):49-58.

Ruela ALM, Perissinato AG, Lino MEdS, Mudrik PS, Pereira GR. Evaluation of skin absorption of drugs from topical and transdermal formulations. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2016 Sep;52(3):527-44. doi: 10.1590/s1984-82502016000300018.

Murthy SN, Hiremath SSR. Preformulation studies of transdermal films of hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose and sodium carboxy methyl cellulose. Int J Pharm Excipients. 2002:34-8.

OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Skin Sensitisation; 1992. p. 406.

Instron homepage. ASTM D638 2021. The definitive guide to plastic tensile testing. https://www.instron.us/testing-solutions/by-standard/astm/multiple-testing-solutions/astm-d638.

Published

28-07-2022

How to Cite

DUBEY, R., POTHUVAN, U., PANDEY, A. K., & GUPTA, B. K. (2022). PHYSIOCHEMICAL, IN-VITRO, EX-VIVO AND IN-VIVO EVALUATION OF TRANSDERMAL PATCHES BASED ON QBD APPROACH: AN OVERVIEW. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 14, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2022.v14ti.20

Issue

Section

Review Article(s)