• Suneeti Gore Department of Microbiology, Fergusson College Pune 411004
  • Anjali Paul
  • Yashada Bhagwat


Objective: Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that provide beneficial effects on human health by improving the balance of intestinal micro flora. Comparative evaluation of 10 (LB1-LB10) commercial probiotic preparations (available in and around Pune) was carried out on the basis of physical parameters, standard plate count (SPC), antibiotic sensitivity and antimicrobial production.

Methods: Effect of temperature, pH and bile tolerance of samples was carried out on de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium and growth were determined by counting colony forming the unit (cfu) value of appropriate dilution after 24 h and 48 h. Antibiotic sensitivity was carried out by disc diffusion assay. Antimicrobial activity was tested using Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus sp. and Klebsiella sp. by in vitro agar well diffusion method

Results: All the 10 samples showed aggregation for SAT (Salt Aggregation Test) at 0.2M ammonium sulphate concentration. It was observed that LB8, LB9 and LB10 were found to be the most promising probiotic product with respect to physical parameters. LB9 was found to be more antibiotic resistant as compared to LB10 and LB8. Antibacterial production of LB9 was seen against all test organisms. Effects of all the 5 NSAIDs were checked and LB8 showed the resistance to all.

Conclusion: LB8 is the most effective probiotic product under adverse conditions followed by LB10 and LB9.

Keywords: Probiotics, Antibiotics, Bile salt, NSAIDs


1. World Health Organization.Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in the food; 2002. Available food safety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf WHO. [Last accessed on 20 Jun 2016]
2. Guarner F, Khan AG. Probiotics and prebiotics World Gastroenterology Organization, Practice Guideline; 2003.
3. Fooladi AAI, Hosseini HM, Nourani MR, Khani S, Alavian SM. Probiotic as a Novel treatment strategy against liver disease. Hepat Mon 2013;13:e752.
4. Furtado DN, Svetoslav D Todorov. Bacteriocinogenic Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis DF04Mi isolated from goat milk: evaluation of the probiotic potential. Braz J Microbiol 2014;3:1047-54.
5. Dicks LMT, Todorov SD, Franco BDGM. Current status of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria. In: Bonilla AR, Muniz KP. editors. Antibiotic resistance: causes and risk factors, mechanisms and alternatives pharmacology-research, Safety Testing and Regulation. Nova Publisher; New York: 2011. p. 379–425.
6. Sanders ME. Probiotics: definition, sources, selection and uses. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46 Suppl 2:S58-S61.
7. Schlundt J. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. FAO/WHO; 2012.
8. E Elliott, K Teversham. An evaluation of nine probiotics available in South Africa. South African Med J 2004;94:121-4.
9. Amin S, Tale VS, Bhadekar RK. Evaluation of the effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the growth of probiotics. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol 2014;20:25-35.
10. Thomas CM. Probiotics-host communication: modulation of signalling pathways in the intestine. Gut Microbes 2010,1:148–63.
499 Views | 1602 Downloads
How to Cite
Gore, S., A. Paul, and Y. Bhagwat. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PROBIOTICS PRODUCTS”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 9, no. 2, Mar. 2017, pp. 26-30, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i2.17376.
Original Article(s)