SONOGRAPHIC REFERENCE LUMINAL DIAMETER OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA AMONG SUBJECTS IN NIGERIA

  • MICHAEL S. OKPALEKE Department of Radiography, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
  • VALENTINE C. IKAMAISE Department of Radiography and Radiological Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
  • KENNETH K. AGWU Department of Radiography, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
  • ANTHONY C. UGWU Department of Radiography, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
  • MICHAEL P. OGOLODOM Department of Rivers State Hospitals Management Board, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to develop a reference luminal diameter (LD) of the abdominal aorta (AA) in Abuja, Nigeria.


Methods: The LD of the AA of 422 male and female healthy subjects was measured sonographically using standard protocol. The relationship between age, body mass index (BMI), gender, and the LD of the AA was determined in the subjects. Statistical analysis was performed by the Student’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient at p < 0.05 level of significance.


Results: The values of the LD of the AA in the healthy subjects were 15.16 ± 0.55 mm in males and 15.15 ± 0.55 mm in females. The 5th and 95th percentile normal reference limits of the AA were 14.20–16.10 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences in the LD measurements in male and female subjects. Age correlated strongly positively with LD (ɼ=0.90) of the AA in both genders. BMI showed weak positive correlation with LD (ɼ=0.136) of the AA in female healthy subjects only.


Conclusion: The reference LD of the AA in the study population was 15.16 ± 0.55 mm in males and 15.15 ± 0.55 mm in females. The LD of the AA increased proportionately with age.

Keywords: Aorta, Luminal diameter, Ultrasonography, Reference level, Age

References

1. Hussain AY, Dakpa T, Fardous M, Melo F, Matinez F, Brzostowski B. Role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ecronicon Cardiol 2018;5:955-68.
2. Kozaburo H, Tomoyuki Y, Akira T, Kohji S. Clinical assessment of arterial stiffness with cardio-ankle vascular index: Theory and applications. J Hyperten 2015;33:1742-57.
3. Raimund E, Holger EB. Aortic dimensions and the risk of dissection. Br Med J 2006;92:137-42.
4. Escudero CA, Herlitz K, Troncoso F, Guevara K, Acurio J, Aguayo C, et al. Pro-angiogec role of insulin: From physiolonigy to pathology. Front Physiol 2017;8:204.
5. Moxon JV, Par A, Emeto TI, Walker P, Norman PE, Golledge J. Diagnosis and monitoring of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Current status and future prospects. Curr Problems Cardiol 2011;35:512-8.
6. Ogunleye EO, Adekola OO, Dada OI. Aortic aneurysm: A life-threatening condition in a low-resource nation. J Clin Sci 2019;2019:252274.
7. Usman BO, Lawal S, Ibinaiye PO, Chom ND, Umar A. Determination of normal supra and infra renal aortic diameter on ultrasound in Zaria, Nigeria. West Afr J Ultrasound 2014;15:1-24.
8. Dokunmu T, Yakubu OF, Adebayo AF, Oleshinde GI, Chinedu SW. Cardiovascular risk factor in suburban community in Nigeria. Int J Hyperten 2018;2018:527-33.
9. Guedes-Martins L, Ana C, Joaquim S, Ana R, Anas SC, Fillipe M, et al. Foetal aortic flow velocity waveforms in healthy and hypertensive pregnant women. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2014;12:1476-7120.
10. Eze JC, Ezemba N, Adamu YA. Study of extra-cranial aneurysms at UNTH in Enugu Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2010;13:272-5.
11. Chinakwana GU, Odike MA, Nwafor AM. Problems and prospects of managing thoracic aortic aneurysm at Nnamdi Azikiwe university teaching hospital, Nnewi Nigeria. World J Surg 2014;28:288-90.
12. Ogbera OA, Chukwuma EB. Diabetes mellitus in Nigeria: The past, present and future. World J Diabetes 2014;5:905-11.
13. Reardon RF, Clinton ME, Madore F, Cook TP. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. In: Ma O, Mater JR, Readon RF, Joing SA. Emergency Ultrasound. 3rd ed. New York; McGraw-Hill; 2014.
14. Moawia G. Normal abdominal aorta diameter on abdominal sonography in healthy asymptomatic adult: The impact of age and gender. J Radiation Res Appl Sci 2019;12:186-91.
15. Laughlin GA, Allison MA, Jensky NE, Aboyans V, Wong ND, Detrano R. Abdominal aortic diameter and vascular atherosclerosis: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;41:481-7.
16. Jasper A, Harshe G, Keshava SN, Kulkarni G, Stephen E, Agarwal S. Evaluation of normal abdominal aortic diameters in the Indian population using computed tomography. J Postgrad Med 2014;60:57-60.
17. Chiu K, Lung L, Tripathi V, Ahmed M, Shrivastira V. Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening; a direct comparison of three leading leading methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;47:367-73.
18. Liisberg M, Diederichsen AC, Lindholt JS. Abdominal ultrasound scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm-a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study. BMC Med Imaging 2017;17:8.
19. Adam DT, David LT, Levente LZ, Solt G, Kinga K, Viktor B. Genetic and environmental effects on the abdominal aortic diameter development. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;106:13-7.
20. Lo RC, Lu B, Fokkema M, Conrad M, Patel V, Fillinger M, et al. Relative importance of aneurysm diameter and body size for predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in men and women. J Vasc Surg 2014;59:1209-6.
Statistics
31 Views | 38 Downloads
Citations
How to Cite
S. OKPALEKE, M., C. IKAMAISE, V., K. AGWU, K., C. UGWU, A., & P. OGOLODOM, M. (2021). SONOGRAPHIC REFERENCE LUMINAL DIAMETER OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA AMONG SUBJECTS IN NIGERIA. Innovare Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijms.2021.v9i1.40044
Section
Original Article(s)