Int J Pharm PharmSci, Vol9, Issue 10, 21-23Original Article


IMPACT OF ACTIVE COMPOUNDS ISOLATED FROM BANANA(MUSA SP. VAR. NANJANGUD RASABALE) FLOWER AND PSEUDOSTEM TOWARDS CYTOPROTECTIVE AND DNA PROTECTION ACTIVITIES

RAMITH RAMU1, PRITHVI S. SHIRAHATTI1, SHRISHA NAIKBAJPE2,VARSHA REDDY S. V.1,
M. N. NAGENDRA PRASAD3*

1Department of Biotechnology, Sri DharmasthalaManjunatheshwara College of Post Graduate Centre, Ujire, Dakshina Kannada 574240, Karnataka, India, 2Department of Studies in Biotechnology, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570006, Karnataka, India, 3Department of Biotechnology, Sri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering, JSS Institution Camp, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, Karnataka, India
Email: ramithramu@gmail.com

Received: 06 Jun 2017 Revised and Accepted: 31 Aug 2017


ABSTRACT

Objective: The present study was designed to evaluate for cytoprotective and DNA protective properties of the compounds isolated from ethanol extract of banana flower (EF) and ethanol extract of banana pseudostem (EE).

Methods: The four active compounds viz., umbelliferone (C1) andlupeol (C2) from EF and stigmasterol (C3) and β-sitosterol (C4) from EEwere isolated byactivity-guided repeated fractionation through silica gel column chromatography. The isolated compounds were evaluated for cytoprotective on erythrocytes andpTZ57R/T plasmid DNA protection against hydroxyl radicals.

Results: The study revealed that the compounds (C1-C4) at a concentration of 1 mg/ml exhibited 90% protection on erythrocytes membrane oxidation andalso protect the pTZ57R/T plasmid DNA damage induced by hydroxyl radicals.

Conclusion: These results endorse an insight for a strong chemical basis to the alleged beneficial role of EF and EE in reducing oxidative stress conditions.

Keywords:Umbelliferone,Lupeol,Stigmasterol,β-Sitosterol


INTRODUCTION

India ranks a considerable position for the largest production of banana fruit in the world followed by Brazil and China [1]. Banana (Musa spp.), as a major fruit of India accounts for about 32% of the total fruit production and is considered to be a good source of biologically active compounds such as dopamine, N-acetyl serotonin, nor-adrenaline, isochronal-4-one derivatives and polyphenols with high antioxidant properties [2–6]. The Indian traditional forms of medicines like Ayurveda and Folkloric have been exploiting roots, stalks, leaves, fruits and different parts of thebanana plant for the treatment and reclaim in the diseases like gout, kidney stones, ulcers, inflammation, fevers, burns, skin diseases, diarrhoea and snakebite [7]. Despite the literature available for its utilitarian value and diverse pharmacological activities viz., antiulcerogenic[8, 9], hypolipidemic[10], antimicrobial, antihypertensive [11], wound healing, antacid, diuretic and antiestrogenic activities[12], a systematic activity guided isolation, identification and characterization of antioxidants from the distinct parts of banana have not been performed to date. Isolation and identification of new antioxidants such as phenolic compounds, nitrogen compounds, carotenoids and other phytochemicals from natural sources are gaining special interest in theprevention of diseases and as well for its ample health benefits over synthetic antioxidant compounds [13]. More recently, banana flower and pseudostem being incidental or secondary products of banana werefound to contain a large amount of dietary fibres conjunct with polyphenols [14]. In this context, an efficient activity-guided isolation and identification for bioactive compounds were performed in the ethanol extract of banana (Musa sp. var. Nanjangud rasa bale) flower (EF) and pseudostem (EE). Nanjangud rasa bale (Nrb) is an elitist innate variety of banana originated from a divine place known as ‘Nanjangud’ in Karnataka, India. Unique characteristics of Nrb such as taste, fibrous texture, nutritional content and its distinct aroma when it ripens fully makes it very popular and exotic variety of banana in Karnataka. Herein the isolation and identification of four potent active compounds, Umbelliferone (C1) andLupeol (C2) from theethanol extract of banana flower (EF)and Stigmasterol (C3) and β-Sitosterol (C4) from ethanol extract of bananapseudostem (EE) were illustrated by spectroscopic means[15, 16]. Therefore, the objective of this studywasto investigate the protective effect of the isolated compounds by free radical-induced damage on erythrocytes and DNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

Reagents and solvents used for extraction were procured from Merck (Mumbai, India). The standard drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Plant material

Fresh banana pseudostem and inflorescence of Musa sp. cv. Nanjangud rasa bale were collected from banana cultivating farms of Nanjangud, Karnataka, Indiaat coordinates 12.11° 7' 11" North, 76.70° 40' 58" East. The specimen (Reg. No.: A4) was identified by the departmentof Horticulture, Government of Karnataka, Mysore, India. Peeling the thick outer leaf-sheath of the tender pseudostem, the inner pith region was collected. Flowers were separated from the inflorescence followed by discarding the spathe. Both pseudostem and flowers were cleaned, cut into small pieces and dried at 40⁰C in an oven. This was powdered using a homogenizer and further stored at 4⁰C until use.

Preparation of extract and isolation of active compounds

The coarse powder was subjected to hot ethanol extraction using a Soxhlet apparatus (twice using 95% ethanol) and filtered. The filtrate was further concentrated in vacuo using rotary evaporator (Rotavapor R-200, Buchi, Switzerland). The active compounds present in EF were identified as UmbelliferoneandLupeol, while Stigmasteroland β-Sitosterol from EE using various spectroscopic methods via successive solvent extraction followed by repeated silica gel column chromatography[15, 16].

DNA protection assay

The extent of protection against pTZ57R/T plasmid-DNA damage by isolated bio active compounds was evaluated as described by Lee et al., [17]. 2 µl of plasmid DNA was incubated with Fenton’s reagent (30mmol H202, 50 µM ascorbic acid and 80 µM FeCl3) containing 0.2 mg/3 µl of compounds and final volume of the mixture was raised up to 15 µl with sterile water. The latter was then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C followed by the addition of loading dye. The DNA was analyzed on 1% agarose gel by carrying out the electrophoresis in TAE buffer (40mmolTris base, 16mmol acetic acid, 1mmol EDTA, pH 8.0) and further stained with ethidium bromide using gallic acid as positive control.

Cytoprotective studies of active compounds on erythrocytes

The cytoprotective studies of erythrocyte oxidation were done according to Suwalskyet al., [18]. Briefly, blood sample was collected from healthy donors in heparinized tubes. The tubes were gently mixed and centrifuged at 1000 g for 15 min to sediment the erythrocytes. The supernatant containing plasma was discarded. The pellet containing erythrocytes was washed 2-3 times with PBS (20mmol, pH 7.4, NaCl-0.9%) and re-suspended with four times the volume of PBS. The compounds were added at 1 mg/ml volume, pre-incubated at room temperature for 5 min followed by addition of hydrogen peroxide (30mmol), ferric chloride (80 µM) as well as ascorbic acid (50 µM) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. During the course of incubation, the reaction mixture was gently shaken to ensure constant proper mixing. The morphological changes were observed and captured (Olympus12.8 megapixel digital camera, DP72) using Olympus microscope (BX41, DSS ImagetechPvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

DNA protection assay

DNA protective ability of the compounds (C1)-(C4) wereevaluated to test their efficacy in protecting the DNA against oxidative damage (fig. 1). The oxidative damage induced by Fenton’s reagent generates hydroxyl free radical leading to DNA fragmentation with increase in its electrophoretic mobility [19] as evident in lane 2. This DNA fragmentation was recovered upon treatment with the compounds and gallic acid (lane 3-7).

Fig.1: Electrophoretic analysis of DNA protection by isolated compounds (C1)-(C4) in additionwith standard gallic acid (0.2 mg/3 µl concentration). Lane 1-Native DNA, Lane 2-DNA+Oxidant, Lane 3-DNA+Compound 1 (umbelliferone)+Oxidant, Lane 4-DNA+Compound 2 (lupeol)+Oxidant, Lane 5-DNA+Compound 3 (stigmasterol)+Oxidant, Lane 6-DNA+Compound 4 (β-sitosterol)+Oxidant, Lane 7-DNA+Gallic acid+Oxidant

In agreement to the gel documentation analysis, higher protection (80%) was observed in gallic acid treated sample, whereas 75%, 67%, 56% and 59% protection was observed for compounds (C1)-(C4) treated samples respectively.

Cytoprotectivestudies of erythrocyte oxidation

Erythrocytes are extensively used model cells for studies on oxidative stress induced cell damage. Oxidative stress induces an echinocytic type of cell alteration and characterized protuberance over the cell membrane[20]. Therefore the protective ability of the isolated compounds on erythrocyte oxidation was studied as there were no reports found on cytoprotective abilities of these compounds.

Fig.2: Microscopic evaluation of erythrocyte morphology represented as (a) Control–red blood cells (RBC’s); (b) RBC’s+oxidant; (c-f) RBC’s+compound (1)-(4) at 1 mg/ml [compound 1: umbellifeone (c), compound 2: lupeol (d), compound 3: stigmasterol (e), compound 4: β–sitosterol (f)]+oxidant after 1h of incubation

Theoptical micrographs (fig. 2a-f) shows the presence of normal cells in addition to oxidised cells indicating the cytoprotective role of compounds (C1)-(C4) treated samples. As compared to normal erythrocytes(fig. 2a) subjected to hydrogen peroxide and ascorbate/Fe2+led to the oxidation of cell membrane rendering distorted and clustered appearance (abnormal erythrocyte–fig. 2b). From our results, it is evident that the isolated compounds were efficient in bringing down the oxidative stress-induced erythrocyte damage and could also revert back the echinocytic shape alteration as well the characteristic protuberances of the cell membrane as observed in fig. 2c-f.

Plants being a rich source of a myriad of bioactive ingredients and phytoconstituents, are the most attractive options to circumvent the problems faced by the administration of synthetic drugs. References of traditional form of medicine have provided a basis for research on such natural products in the treatment of several diseases[21].Secondary metabolites isolated from banana flower and pseudostem contained predominantly phenolic group of compounds and phytosterols respectively would be responsible for its cytoprotective and DNA protective activities. Recently, such compounds have attracted a wide consideration for its potential protective role against oxidative damage diseases. The isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds, UmbelliferoneandLupeol from EF and Stigmasteroland β-Sitosterol from EE supports this statement. The activities ascended in the order: Umbelliferone>Stigmasterol>Lupeol>β-Sitosterol. These findings establish the isolated compounds as prospective drug attributes.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study endows the additional data to the literature about potential bioactive compounds from EF and EE.Also it suggests that this traditional form of medicine could be supplemented as a diet or in the form of nutraceutical for the treatment of oxidative damage diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Ramith Ramuthanks TEQIP, New Delhi, India for awarding the Research fellowship. The authors also thank The Principal, SJCE, Mysore, for his encouragement.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION

M N NAGENDRA PRASAD: Designed the work

RAMITH RAMU: Data collection and analysis

PRITHVI S SHIRAHATTI: Wrote the manuscript

SHRISHA NAIKBAJPEand VARSHA REDDY S V: Contributed the materials/analysis tools/reagents

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

There is no conflict of interest to declare

REFERENCES

  1. Joshi S. Eugenia jambolana, Musa paradisiacal L. In: Joshi S. Medicinal Plants. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd:New Delhi;2000. p.286–94.

  2. Someya S, Yoshiki Y, Okubo K. Antioxidant compounds from bananas (Musa cavendish). Food Chem 2002;79:351–4.

  3. Kanazawa K, Sakakibara H. High content of dopamine, a strong antioxidant in Cavendish banana. J Agric Food Chem 2000;48:844–8.

  4. Pari L, Umamaheshwari J. Antihyperglycemic activity of Musa sapientum flowers-effect on lipid peroxidation in alloxan diabetic rats. Phytother Res 2000;14:136-8.

  5. Hai Q, Wen LH, Xiao MW, Hui BZ, Jin PZ, Wen CY. A new isochroman-4-one derivative from the peel of Musasapientum (L) and its total synthesis. Chinese ChemLett2007;18:1227-30.

  6. Waalkes TP, Sjoerdsma A, CrevelingCR, Weissbach H, Udenfriend S. Serotonin, norepinephrine and related compounds in bananas. Science 1958;127:648-53.

  7. Pellai N, Aashan TN. Ayurveda Prakashika. (Reddiar and Son). Vidyarambha Press:Quilon, India;1955. p.97−115.

  8. Goel RK, Sairam K. Anti-ulcer drugs from indigenous sources with emphasis on Musa sapientum, Tamrabhasma, Asparagus racemosus and Zingiber officinale. Indian J Pharmacol 2002;34:100-10.

  9. Lewis DA, Fields WN, Shaw GP. A natural flavonoid present in unripe plantain banana pulp (Musasapientum L. var. paradisiaca) protects the gastric mucosa from aspirin-induced erosions. J Ethnopharmacol 1999;65:283-8.

  10. Gomathy R, VijayalakshmiNR, Kurup PA. Hypolipidemic principle of the inflorescence stalk of plantain (Musasapientum). J Bioscien 1989;14:301-9.

  11. Anonymous. The Wealth of India. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research: New Delhi, India; 2003. p. 178–85.

  12. Jain DL, Baheti AM, Ingale SP, Ingale PL, Parakh SR. Study of antacid and diuretic activity of ash and extracts of Musa sapientum (L) fruit peel. PharmacognMagaz 2007;3:116-9.

  13. Devasagayam TPA, Tilak JC, Boloor KK, Ketaki SS, Saroj SG, Lele RD. Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: Current status and future prospects. J AssocPhys India 2004;52:794–804.

  14. Jamuna JB, Mahadevamma S, Nandini D, Salimath PV. Banana (Musa sp. var. elakki bale) flower and pseudostem: dietary fiber and associated antioxidant capacity. J AgricFood Chem2012;60:427-32.

  15. Ramith R, Prithvi SS, Farhan Z, Lakshmi VR, Nagendra MNP. Inhibitory effect of banana (Musa sp. var. Nanjangud rasa bale) flower extract and its constituents Umbelliferone and Lupeol on α-glucosidase, aldose reductase and glycation at multiple stages. South Afr J Bot 2014;95:54–63.

  16. Ramith R, Prithvi SS, Nanjunda SS, Zameer F, Bhadrapura LD, Nagendra PMN. Assessment of in vivo antidiabetic properties of umbelliferone and lupeol constituents of banana (Musa sp. var. Nanjangud Rasa Bale) flower inhyperglycaemic rodent model. PLoSOne 2016;11:e0151135. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151135.

  17. Lee JC, Kim J, Jang YS. Antioxidant property of an ethanol extract of the stem of opuntiaficus-indica var. saboten. J Agric Food Chem 2002;5:6490-6.

  18. Suwalsky M, Orellana P, Avello M, Villena F. Protective effect of UgnimolinaeTurcz against oxidative damage of human erythrocytes. Food ChemToxicol 2007;45:130–5.

  19. Harish NMA, Sathisha UV, Shylaja MD. Cytoprotective and antioxidant activity of free, conjugated and insoluble-bound phenolic acids from swallow root (Decalepishamiltonii). Food Chem 2010;119:1307–12.

  20. Harish NMA,Sathisha UV,Manohar MP,Chandrashekar KB,Shylaja MD. Cytoprotective and antioxidant activity studies of jaggery sugar. Food Chem 2009;115:113–8.

  21. Hazrulrizawati AH, Senait SZ, Mashitah MY. Rhodomyrtustomentosa:a phytochemical and pharmacological review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:10–6.

How to cite this article

  • Ramith Ramu, Prithvi S Shirahatti, ShrishaNaikBajpe, Varsha Reddy SV, MN Nagendra Prasad. Impact of active compounds isolated from banana (MUSA SP. VAR. nanjangudrasabale) flower and pseudostem towards cytoprotective and DNA protection activities.Int J Pharm PharmSci 2017;9(10):21-23.



About this article

Title

IMPACT OF ACTIVE COMPOUNDS ISOLATED FROM BANANA (MUSA SP. VAR. NANJANGUD RASABALE) FLOWER AND PSEUDOSTEM TOWARDS CYTOPROTECTIVE AND DNA PROTECTION ACTIVITIES

Keywords

Umbelliferone, Lupeol, Stigmasterol, β-Sitosterol

DOI

10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i10.20560

Date

02-10-2017

Additional Links

Manuscript Submission

Journal

International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vol. 9, Issue 10, 2017 Page: 21-23

Online ISSN

0975-1491

Statistics

1 Views | Downloads

Authors & Affiliations

Ramith Ramu
Department of Biotechnology, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Post Graduate Centre, Ujire, Dakshina Kannada – 574240, Karnataka, India
India

Prithvi S. Shirahatti
Department of Biotechnology, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Post Graduate Centre, Ujire, Dakshina Kannada – 574240, Karnataka, India
India

Shrisha Naik Bajpe
Department of Studies in Biotechnology, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570006, Karnataka, India
India

Varsha Reddy S V
Department of Biotechnology, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Post Graduate Centre, Ujire, Dakshina Kannada – 574240, Karnataka, India
India

M. N. Nagendra Prasad
Department of Biotechnology, Sri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering, JSS Institution Camp, Manasagangothri, Mysore – 570 006, Karnataka, India


Article Tools



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.