Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 9, Issue 10, 128-136Original Article



1Department of Pharmaceutics, Annamacharya College of Pharmacy, New Boyanapalli, Rajampet 516126, A. P, India, 2Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupathi 517502. A. P.,India

Received: 18 Jun 2017 Revised and Accepted: 31 Aug 2017


Objective: Currently natural polymers have widespread importance in fabrication of controlled drug delivery systems. Hence in this study ocimum basilicum mucilage, (OBM) a natural polymer used to know its effect as polymer alone and in combination with HPMC K15M and Guargum inoral in situ floating gel of Valsartan using 3 full level factorial design.

Methods:FTIR studies conducted to know major drug polymer interactions. OBM, HPMC K15M and Guargum were chosen as three independent variables and examined at 3 levels for in vitrobuoyancy (Y1) and drug release at 10 h (Y2) as responses. By using mathematical model approach formulation variables were quantitatively evaluated, and optimized formulation (VFIG) subjected for in vitro buoyancy, density, pH, in vitro drug release, drug content, gelling capacity and drug release kinetics. In addition VFIG studied for In vivo buoyancy and release kinetics.

Results:FTIR studies revealed that excipients were compatible with drug.ANOVA results shown that independent variables have significant effect (p<0.05) on both the responses.Observed responses of optimized formulation (3% OBM, 0.88% HPMC and 1.25% Guar gum) were in good agreement with the experimental values. Results of allin vitroevaluations lies within the limits and drug release kinetics followed non-fickian diffusion mechanism. In vivo buoyancy study in rabbit evidenced floatation for>8 h and in vivo pharmacokinetic study exhibited increased bioavailability of optimized formulation.

Conclusion:Prepared VFIG with optimized concentrationsof OBM, HPMC K15M and Guargum exploiting as a promising dosage form for enhanced gastric delivery.

Keywords: Valsartan, Natural polymers, OBM,In situ floating gel,Buoyancy studies, 3 Levelfull factorial design


As the oral route account for ease of self-administration and other advantages,most manufacturers prefer to formulate a drug in suitable dosage form for oral delivery. These reasons now attributed for the development of oral drug delivery systems.Drugs which have primary absorption in the stomach region require gastric residence for longer times.Such drugs, if formulated in oral conventional dosage forms fail to reside the drug in gastric region.Hence gastro retentive drug delivery systems have been developed by many approaches[1].Raft forming system is one of the commonly used approaches for gastric retention of drugs with primary absorption in the stomach region[2].

Valsartan is an angiotensin-II receptor (which is a potent vasoconstrictor),type I antagonist, especially used in hypertension,congestive heart failure and heart attack.Angiotensin-II binding at AT-I receptor is blocked by this drug results in vasodilation which inturn lowers blood pressure[3].This is a weak acidic drug has absorption window in the acidic environment of stomach[4].It is rapidly absorbed orally but unfortunately its bioavailability is 23%.Hence number of formulations in the form of solid dispersions[5],β-cyclodextrin complexes[6],microcapsules[7] etc.,have been fabricated by many researchers inorder to overcome its low bioavaiabilityand low solubility.But no attempt has been made to address the retention of valsartan at it’s absorption window.So in the present study an attempt was made todevelop an in situ gel dosage form toincrease the bioavailability of drug by taking the advantage of its primary absorption in the stomach region.

Recently there is a trend in the use of natural polymers in tailoring of drug delivery systems due to added advantages[8]. Hence in this study ocimum basilicum mucilage (OBM) was selected which is an anionic polysaccharide obtained from seeds of ocimum basilicum linn., comprised of glucomannan(43%) as major fraction and glucan(2.3%) as minor fraction [9,10]. It’sthickening and stabilizing properties have been attributed to offer potential application in this formulation and first time thisstudy conducted to explore it as gelling polymer.In situ solutionsundergo phase transition to gel,due to variation in physiochemical properties like change in pH,temperature,ion activation etc.,[11].Main principle involved in this formulation is pH induced ionic gelation. Sodium citrate complexes with free Ca2+and maintains the fluidity of in situ gel until it reaches the stomach. Once the formulation reaches the stomach, in the presence of acidic environment Ca2+get releases and triggers thegelation of OBM.Effervescent agent helps the formulation to float on the gastric contents for extended period [12].

Statistical experimental designinvolves study of effect of independent variables on dependent variables with least number of experiments and reduces the time required for developmental work[13-16].OBM elicit gelation in gastric pH and it’s combination with HPMC K15M and guargum postulates durg release retarding power and excellent buoyant properties.The present study aimed at optimization of OBM as gelling polymer alone and in combination with HPMC K15M and guar gum using 33 factorial design.



Valsartan was obtained as a gift sample from Dr. Reddy’s labs, Hyderabad, India.Ocimum basilicum seeds were purchased from local market Rajampet,A. P,India. Their species was authenticated by Mrs. N. Uma,Botanist from Government degree college, Rajampet A. P. India. HPMCK15M was obtained from Vijaya chemicals pvt.Ltd,Pune, India.Calcium carbonate was obtained from Thermo fisher scientific Pvt.Ltd Mumbai; India.Guar gum was obtained from Genuine chemicals co.,Mumbai,India.Sodium citrate,Sodium bicarbonate wereprocured from Universal laboratories pvt.LtdMumbai, India.All other chemicals used were of pharmaceutical or analytical grade.


Extraction of Ocimum basilicum seed mucilage

Mucilage extraction from ocimum basilicum seedswas carried out by a modified method ofRazavi et al.[17]where100 g of cleaned ocimumseeds were subjected for soaking in distilled water(at 35 °c for 12 h) seed ratio of 10:1 andblendedat 1500 rpm for 15 min to scrap the gum layer off the seed surface.Blended mass allowed to squeeze with the aid of 8 folds of muslin cloth to extract the mucilage.The filtrate was precipitated in the equal amount of the acetone. The precipitated mucilage was separated,dried,milled,packed and kept in dry condition.

FTIR studies

FTIR studies were conducted to know thecompatibility between drug and excipients.In this studies pure valsartan,pure OBM and its mixture with HPMC K15M and guargum were grounded thoroughly with IR grade KBr,then compressed in a hydraulic press at a pressure of 10,000 psig,to get a disc. Each disc was scanned over a range of 400-4500 cm-1 using FTIR instrument (FTIR-1600, Shimadzu,Japan).The characteristic peaks were observed and recorded.

Formulation of in situ gel

Solutions of OBM,guargum,HPMC K15M, were made individually and in combination by the use of deionized water containing 0.05%w/v of sodium citrate and calcium chloride,using magnetic stirrer with constant stirring. These polymer solutions were heated to 60 °C then allowed to reduce temperatures to 40 °C. Sodium bi carbonate (0.75%w/v) and valsartanwere added and stirring was continued to get an uniform dispersion.Finally sodium benzoate (0.1%w/v) and sucrose (10%w/v) were added and volume was made upto 100ml[18].

Experimental design

A three-level, three-factorial (33) design chosen for present experimentation using a software DESIGN EXPERT® version variables selected were the concentration of HPMC K15M(A), Guar gum(B), and OBM(C).Low(-1), medium(0), and high settings (+1)were thecoded factorial levels for three independent variables[19,20].Chosen dependent variables for investigation werefloating lag time(in vitrobuoyancy)(Y1), anddrug release at 10 h (Y2). A total of 27 experimental runs were conducted as shown in table 1 to optimize and analyze the interaction of each level on parameters of formulations.Multiple factorial regression analysis (quadratic model) was carried out to measure the effect of three variables on response(Yi).

WhereYi-Dependent variable,

b0-Arithmetic mean response of27 combinations;

b1, b2, b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b9-Regression coefficients

A, B and C(Main effects)were the average results of changing one factor at a time from its low to high levels by keeping other two constant.AB,AC and BC(Interaction terms)show,how the response changes when two factors are simultaneously changed.A2,B2andC2(Polynomial terms)were usedtoinvestigatenonlinearity.

The significance of three factors and their interactions were evaluated with analysis of variance(ANOVA) and F statistics and t-values were also calculated [21].3D response surface plots given visualized observation of how the responseparameters affected by independent variables. Desirability approach was employed to locate the optimal settings of the formulation variables to obtain desired response.

Table 1:33 full factorial design of valsartan floating in situ gel

Coded values Actual values
HPMC K15M(%) A
High (+1) 1.50
Medium (0) 0.75
Low (-1) 0

Evaluation of formulations

Total 27 formulations were evaluated for following two parameters.

Floating lag time studies for in vitro buoyancy

Floating lag time was measured in in vitro buoyancy test.USP Type II dissolution test apparatus containing 500 ml of simulated gastric fluid (pH-1.2), with paddle rotation of 50 rpm and 37±0.5 °C temperature were selected for this study. Petri plate (diameter 2 inch) containing in situ gelling solution (10 ml) was placed on the surface of the medium and plunged in to the medium with the moving paddle. The time required for the gelled mass to reach surface of the dissolution medium as floating lag time (Y1)was noted.This was measured for each formulation in triplicate[22-24].

In vitro drug release studies

USP type II(paddle type) apparatus was used to know thedrug release by providing 50 rpm in 900 ml of simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2),at 37±0.5 °Ctemperature.Ten milliliters of in situ gel containing valsartan was transferred to dissolution medium,at predefined time intervals, 1 ml of aliquot was collected, filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter, suitably diluted and analyzed at 250 nm by UV spectrophotometer(UV-1800,Shimadzu,Japan). Withdrawn test sample replenished with fresh dissolution medium. All studies were run for a period of 10 h in triplicate [25-27] and the amount of drug dissolved at 10th h (Y2) was noted for all 27 formulations.

Preparation of optimized formulation

Based on the results of above 2 responses of 27 formulations, the optimized concentration for A,B and C were obtainedin desirability approach using software DESIGN EXPERT® version Optimized valsartan floating in situ gel(VFIG) was prepared using optimized concentrations of HPMC K15M,guar gum and OBM and evaluated for the responses(Y1and Y2). Thevalues obtained were compared with those predicted by the mathematical model generated,in addition VFIGwas also evaluated forpH,density,viscosity,drug content,in vitro gelling capacity,in vivo buoyancy and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies.

Characterization ofoptimized floating in situ gel


Determination of pHfor VFIGwas carried out by electrometric method by taking adequate volume in a 50 ml beaker using standardized digital pH meter at room temperature.

In vitro gelling capacity

Five milliliters of the gelation solution (simulated gastric fluid,pH 1.2) was taken into a 15 ml test tube maintained37±1 °C temperature andformulation (1ml) was added slowly to (surface of the fluid) the test tube.A stiff gel like structure was formed immediately afterformulation comes in contact with gelation solution. The gelling capacity of solution was gradedbased on the stiffness of formed gel and time period for which the gel retained its rigidity into following three categories [28].1.(+) Gels after five min, dispersed within 8 h; 2.(++) Gels within 60 sec. and retains gel structure for 12 h.; 3.(+++) Gels immediately and retains gel structure for more than 12 h.


Water displacement method was used to determine the density of the gel formulation.In this study20 mlof simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2)was added to 10 ml of in situ solution, to form a gel. So formed gel was weighed after decantation of excess of gastric fluid. The gel was allowed to settle at the base in a 50 ml measuring cylinder.Distilled water was added up to 50 ml marking of measuring cylinder. In presence of gel thevolume of water was noted. Amount of water displaced by the gel was calculated from the difference in the volumes of water with and without gel[29].

Determination of viscosity

Brook field viscometer (DV-ELV) was utilized for viscosity measurement of optimized formulation. The samplealiquot of 50 ml was sheared withspeed of spindle 100 rpm at physiological temperature(37 °C). Three replicates were carried out[30].

Drug content

Ten milliliters of the formulation was added to 900 ml of simulated gastric fluid and stirred for 1 h on a magnetic stirrer. The solution was filtered, suitably diluted with simulated gastric fluid and the drug concentration was determined by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-1800 Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 250 nm against a suitable blank solution[31].

In vivo floating studies in rabbit

After getting approval from Institutional Ethics Committee, Sri Padmavathi Women’s University(SPMVV),Tirupati,Andhra Pradesh, India(1677/PO/Re/S/2012/CPCSEA/11),the study was employed using 2.5 kghealthy rabbit whichwas housedthree days and fasted for 12 h prior to the studybut waterallowed. An in situ gel prepared by employing BaSo4as X-ray opaque material (to enable visibility) in place of drug was made to swallowusing stomach sonde needle and X-ray photographs ofrabbit abdomenwere taken at pre identified time intervals of0,0.5,2 and 8 h[32].

Invivo pharmacokinetic studies

Rabbits with weight of 2.5±0.5 kg were selected for the study with 24 h fasting just before the start of the experiment. Twelve such male rabbits were randomly divided into two groups.Using stomach sonde needle, VFIG and valsartan drug suspension were administered first and second groups respectively at a dose of 03mg/kg body weight of rabbit.At appropriate time intervals 0.5 ml blood samples were collected through ear vein into heparinized tubes. With maintenance of 5,000 rpm for 10 min using a high-speed centrifuging machine, blood samples were centrifuged and resulting samples were stored at −18 °C until analyzed by HPLC[18].

Treatment of plasma samples

An aliquot of 100 µl plasma sample was taken into a RIA® vial, 10 µl of 100 µg/mlamilodipine(ISTD (internal standard)) was added, mixed and vortexed for 20 sec. A 100 µl of 1.5 %v/v HCl was added to this mixture, mixed for 30 sec and 2 ml of ethyl acetate was added. Samples were extracted for 4 min and centrifuged at 3200 rpm for 4 min. Supernatant 1.6 ml was transferred to evaporation tubes and dried gently under nitrogen gas at 50 ˚C for 12 min and reconstituted with 500 µl of mobile phase and 20 µl was injected onto an analytical column to perform the analysis[33].

HPLC analysis

Chromatographic separation was performed at a flow rate of1.0 ml/min, at a wavelength of 272 nm, using an inertsil ODS-3, C18, (4.6×250 mm, 5.0 µm) column. The column temperature was maintainedat 35 °C. The mobile phase was water: acetonitrile: glacial acetic acid (500:500:01).Representative chromatogram has been shown in fig. 5.

With aid of kinetica software various pharmacokinetic parameters like-maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0→t and AUC0→∞), elimination half-life (t1/2), mean residence time (MRT) and elimination rate constant (Kel) etc, weredetermined.


FTIR studies

FTIR spectrum of valsartan (fig. 1(a)) exhibited characteristic peaks at 3286 cm-1(N–H functional group), 3059 cm-1 (Saturated C–H group stretching), 2962 cm-1 (Unsaturated C–H group stretching),1728 cm-1 (carboxyl carbonyl),1600 cm-1 (amide carbonyl group). The peak at 1469 cm-1 indicated the presence of C=C aromatic group.In the FTIR of OBM(fig. 1[b])occurrance of peak at the 2958 cm−1 signified C-H stretching of alkyl group.The observed characteristic peak at 3429 cm−1 owing to OH stretching of alcohol (or water absorbent).Peaks at 1060 cm-1 and at 952 cm−1 were also detected in the present study for N-H primary amide and C-H aromatic bondrespectively.Appearance of characteristic peaks in the physical mixture(fig. 1(c), pure valsartan and polymer OBM indicated the absence of incompatibility between drug and polymers.

Fig.1: FTIR spectrum of (A) Valsartan (B) OBM (C) valsartan+polymer mixture

In vitro buoyancy test

Measurement of floating lag time(Y1) was carried out for all27 runs. For response(Y1) aquadratic model was suggested by software on application of factorial design.The Model F-value of 62.00 implied that model was significant.There was only a 0.01% chance that a large "Model F-Value" could occur due to noise. Values of "Prob>F" less than 0.0500 indicated model terms were significant.In this case A, B, C, AB, A2, C2 were considered as significant model terms due to their P values. P values lesser than 0.1000 indicated, the model terms were significant.The quadratic equationforY1 was shown in equation (2).

Equation(2) prooved that floating lag time decreaseswith an increase in amount of factor A,factor Band factor C. This was due to high swelling property of the polymers. Similar result was found in gastro retentive matrix tablets of ziprasidone hydrochloride containig HPMC K4M by Sateesha et al.[34]. Combined effect of A* B and A* C were positive but B* Cwas negative on floating lag time which was exhibited by contour plot and 3Dresponse surface plots (fig. 2).

In vitro drug release at 10 h, Q10(Y2)

Measurement of drug release at 10 h (Y2) was carried out for all 32 runs. For thisresponse (Y2) a quadratic model was suggested by software on application of factorial design.The Model F-value of 395.51 implied that the model was significant. Values of "Prob>F" less than 0.0500. indicated that the model terms were significant. In this case A, B, C, AB, BC, C2 were significant model terms. The equation for response Y2was shown in equation (3).

Equation (3) prooved that drug release rate appeared to decrease with an increase in amounts offactors A, B, and C. This is in agreement with the literature provided by Rajani et al. [35]. The combined effect of A*B, A*C are negative but B*C is positive on drug release at 10 h was exhibited by contour plot and 3D response surface plots (fig. 3).

A numerical optimization technique using the desirability approach with Design Expert software was employed to develop optimized formulation with the desired responses. Constraints were set for minimizing floating lag time and drug release at 10 h to locate the optimum setting of independent variables. Optimized in situ gel formula was arrived by the software which comprised of 3%w/v of OBM, 0.88%w/v of HPMC K15M and 1.25%w/v of Guar gum. The optimized formulation (VFIG) was evaluated for percentage drug release at 10 h, and floating lag time, which were in good correlation with the predicted values as shown in table 2 with desirability of 0.923. The optimized formulation was further evaluated for parameters like pH, drug content, in vitro gelling capacity, viscosity, density, in vitrodrug release kinetics, in vivobuoyancy studies and in vivo pharmacokinetics and results were shown in table 3.




Fig. 2: Counter plots and response surface plots for (a) effect ofA*C, (b) effect ofA*B, (c) effect ofB*ConFloating lag time (Y1)




Fig. 3: Counter plots and response surface plots for (a) effect ofA*B, (b) effect ofA*C,(c) effect ofB*Con drug release at 10 h (Y2)

Table 2: Comparison between predicted and experimental values for VFIG

Parameter Predicted values Experimental Values
1. Floating lag time (secs)Y1 36.3024 36.0021±0.24
2. Drug release at10h(Q10)Y2 67.9226 66.9678±0.2

Each value represents the mean±standard deviation (n=3)

Evaluation of optimized formulation

pH and density

VFIGwas found tohave pHof6.5 and it was within the acceptable range.It is worthy to note that floating systems must possess density lesser than gastric contents (~1.004 gm/cm3).The measured density of VFIG was 0.869 gm/cm3(table 3). This less density could contribute to the floatability of VFIG.

Viscosityanddrug content

Optimized formulation was shown viscosity of339.5±0.76 cps,(table 3) which is suitable for retaining it’s gel structure and it was considered to be attributed by optimized concentrations of HPMC K15M and Guargum which was evidenced by counter plots.Significance ofviscosity built up in formulations by HPMC K15M and guargum was evidenced by Nanjwadeet al. [36] and Alexander et al.[37] in their individual studies.Insignificant loss of drug during the formulation was evidenced by the result of percent drug content of formulation and it was found to be 99.57±0.86 (table 3).

In vitro gelling capacity

Optimized formulation after administration turned out in gel form by formation of 3D-network by complexation with Ca2+ions and hydrogen bonding with water as a result of consequences of aggregation of the double helical segments this gelling capacity of OBM is evidenced by Yadav et al. in their study [38]. The ascribed grade for gelling capacity of the formulation was (+++), indicating immediate gelation on contact with acidic environment and retains gel structure for more than 12 h. The rigidity of the gel has been citing as a primary factor for controlled release of the formulation since the drug molecules have to infiltrate through the complex network of polymer chains to reach the physiological environment.

Table 3: Results of different parameters of VFIG

S. No. Parameter Values
1. Floating lag time (Sec.) 36.0021±0.24
2. Q10 (%) 66.9678±0.2
3. Density(gm/cm3) 0.869±0.1
4. Viscosity (cps) 339.5±0.76
5. Drug content (%) 99.57±0.86
6. In vitro gelling capacity +++
Drugrelease kinetics
7. Zero order (R2) 0.964
8. Higuchi (R2) 0.963
9. Hixson crowell (R2) 0.981
10. Korsmeyer peppas (R2) 0.991
11. Korsmeyer peppas (n) 0.819

(+++)-Gels immediately and retains gel structure for more than 12 h, Each value represents the mean±standard deviation (n=3)

Kinetic modeling of dissolution data

Optimized formulation (VFIG) drug release data fitted to kinetic modeling. Regression coefficient values evidenced that dissolution data was well fitted to zero order, first order, Higuchi model,Korsmeyer peppas and Hixon–crowell model (table 3).But highest value ofregression coefficient (R2 = 0.991) found for Peppas indicatedthe best fit modelthe'n'value of Peppas was 0.819. This provided the information of formulation follows non-Fickian release or anomalous diffusion mechanism. This findingsconfirmed that drug exhibited chain relaxation as well as diffusion mechanisms.

Formulation containing OBM when comes in contact with simulated gastric fluid, calciumchloride brokendown and released free ca2+ionsthat induced gelation due to dimeric association of OBM. Similar dimeric association of OBM with Ca2+ions was supported by Razavi et al. [39] in their study. As polymer (OBM) being anionic readily cross links with free ca2+ions [9]. In addition HPMC K15M and guargum used in the formulation, slowed down the valsartan release and improved residence time of the formulation. Abraham et al.[40] reported drug release retardant potential of guargum in their study and Deng et al.[41] proved drug release retarding efficiency of HPMC K15M.

In vivobuoyancy studies

X-ray studies were performed on rabbit to check the floating ability of VFIG after oral administration(oral feeding tube was served for administration). The X-ray radiographic imageson abdomen were taken ati) Empty stomach, ii) after 0.5 h of feeding of gel iii) after 2 h iv) after 8 h.These studies,confirmed that VFIGfloated in stomach immediately after administration and continued for nearly 8 h without any disturbance as shown in fig. 4. It has been speculated that inaddition to firm gel formation, floating also a prerequisite for this formulation.

Fig.4: X-ray radiograms showing presence of VFIG in gastric region of rabbit at i) 0 h, ii) 0.5 h,iii) 2 h, iv) 8 h respectively

In vivo pharmacokinetic studies

Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma concentration time profile and HPLC chromatogram of valsartan and ISTDwere presented in table 4, fig. 5 and6. Mean pharmacokinetic values obtained after plasma analysis of plain drug suspension(standard)andVFIG (test)were as follows: Cmax, 0.4246 and 0.483 μg/ml; Tmax, 1 and 12 h; AUC0-12, 0.5630 and 5.998 h. µg/mlrespectively. In VFIGhike in Tmax,elevation in AUC0-12 implied extended release and improved bioavailability of the drug.Although standard formulation reached peak plasma in 1 h, gradually decreasedwithin 2 h,butVFIGattained a peak at 12 h and decreased gradually, this prolonged plasma concentrations relied on the synergistic effect of polymers. Further, significant increase in AUMC, MRT and t1/2 with VFIGproven the controlled release of valsartan fromin situ gel.This significant differences between pharmacokinetic parameters made this VFIG the best formulation.

Fig.5: HPLC Chromatogram of valsartan and ISTD(Amlodipine)

Fig.6: Plasma concentration time profile of plain valsartan suspension and VFIG(n=6, mean±SD)

Table 4: Pharmacokinetic parameters of VFIG (test) and plain drug suspension(Reference)(n=6, mean±SD)

Pharmacokinetic parameters VFIG (Test) Plain drug suspension (Reference)
Cmax (μg/ml) 0.438±0.42 0.4246±0.12
Tmax (h) 12±0.04 1±0.005
AUC (μg*h/ml) 5.9987±1.45 0.5630±0.04
AUMC (μg*h 2/ml) 72.006±0.003 0.6548±0.01
MRT (h) 12.0036±2.54 1.16292±0.06
T1/2 (h) 5.1266±0.68 0.6369±0.55
Cl (1/h) 0.4466±0.88 4.6496±0.33
Vd (l) 3.3037±1.45 4.2725±0.56


In this study an improved in situ gel was formed by pH induced and ionic activation mechanism,in the combination of OBM,Guar gum and HPMC K15M with desirable characteristic features in acidic environment.By application of 33 full level factorial design, it was found that theconcentration of OBM,HPMC K15M and Guar gum significantly affected the dependent variables like floating lag time (Y1) and percent drug released at 10 h(Y2). From findings of the factorial design it was concluded that natural polymer OBM exhibited better drug release in combination with two polymers when compared to alone, and Korsmeyer-Peppas model provided information on drug release from gel structure and indicated diffusion-controlled release. Nonetheless the present work aimed to combine OBM, Guar gum and HPMC K15M, seemsto possess sufficient viscosity,increased bioavailability as the gel being present in high amounts at optimized concentrations of polymers. This property could contribute increased diffusion length so that drug release was retarded. This floating oral in situ gel predominantly beneficial for pediatric and geriatric patients and reducing dose frequency.


The author is thankful for the cooperation andfacilities provided by the institute with kind permissionof Sri C. Gangi Reddy, Chairman, AITS and Prof.C. Gopinath, Principal, Annamacharya College ofpharmacy. The author is also grateful to the Dr. Reddy’s labs, Hyderabad, for providing free drug sample ofvalsartan.


Conception and design of work: Prof. M. Vidyavathi

Data collection and analysis: Mrs. S. Prasanthi

Data interpretation: Prof. M. Vidyavathi

Drafting of the article: Mrs. S. Prasanthi

Critical revision of article: Prof. M. Vidyavathi andMrs. S. Prasanthi

Final approval of the article to publish: Prof. M. Vidyavathi and Mrs. S. Prasanthi


The authors report no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise


  1. Saritha C, Shayeda S. Development and characterization of gastroretentive drug delivery system for ritonavir tablets using natural polymers. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:318-22.

  2. Neha V,Manoj B. Gatro retentive insitu gel formulation-an overview.Int Bull Drug Res 2013;3:69-82.

  3. Ahad A, Aqil M, Kohli K, Sultana Y, Mujeeb M, Ali A. Role of novel terpenes in transcutaneous permeation of valsartan: effectiveness and mechanism of action.Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2011;37:583-96.

  4. Naveen C, Nalini S, Rama Rao T. Use of the liquisolid compact technique for improvement of the dissolution rate of valsartan. Act Pharma Sin B 2012;2:502-8.

  5. Yan YD, Sung JH, Kim KK, Kim DW, Kim JO, Lee BJ,et al. Novel valsartan-loaded solid dispersion with enhanced bioavailability and no crystalline changes. Int J Pharm 2012;422:202-10.

  6. Cappello B, Maio Di, Iervolino CM, Miro A. Improvement of solubility and stability of valsartan by hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. J Incl Macrocy Chem 2006;54:289-94.

  7. Dong Xun Li, Yi Dong Yan, Dong Hoon Oh, Kwan Yeol Yang, Yoon Gi Seo, Jong Oh Kim,et al. Development of valsartan loaded gelatin microcapsules without crystal change using Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose as a stabilizer. Drug Delivery 2010;17:322-5.

  8. Kharwade RS, More SM, Mahajan UN. Formulation and evaluation of gastroretentive floating tablet using Hibiscus rosa-sinensis mucilage. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:444-8.

  9. Razavi SMA, Mortazavi SA, Matia-Merino L, Hosseini-Parvar SH, Motamedzadegan A, Khanipour E. Optimization study of gum extraction from basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum linn). Int J Food Sci Technol 2009;44:1755-62.

  10. Tharanathan RN, Anjaneyulu YV. Structure of acid stable core polysaccharide derived from the seed mucilage of Ocimum basilicunm linn. AustJ Chem 1975;28:1345-50.

  11. Swathi G, Lakshmi PK. Design and optimization of hydrodynamically balanced oralinsitugel of glipizide. J Appl Pharma Sci 2015;5:31-8.

  12. Jadhav SL, Benerjee SK. Formulation and evaluation of floating Insitu gel of nizatidine. IntJ Res Pharma Sci 2013;4:250-5.

  13. Furlanetto S, Cirri M, Maestrelli F, Corti G, Mura P. Study of formulation variables influencing the drug release rate from matrix tablets by experimental design. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;62:77-84.

  14. Schwartz JB, O Connor RE. Optimization techniques in pharmaceutical formulation and processing. In: Banker GS, Rhodes CT. editors. Modern pharmaceutics. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p.727–52.

  15. Lewis GA, Mathieu D, Phan-Tan-Luv R. Pharmaceutical experimental design. New York, Marcel Dekker; 1999.

  16. Lunstedt T, Seifert E, Abramo L, Thelin R, Nystrom A, Pettersen J. Experimental design and optimization. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 1998;42:3-40.

  17. Razavi SMA, Mortazavi SA, Matia-Merino L, Hosseini-Parvar SH, Motamedzadegan A,Khanipour E. Optimization study of gum extraction from basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum linn). Int J Food Sci Technol2009;44:1755-62.

  18. Haoping Xu, Min Shi, Ying liu, Jinling Jiang, Tao Ma. A novel insitu gel formulation of ranitidine for oral sustained delivery. Biomol Ther 2014;22:161-5.

  19. Sáskaa Zs, Dredána J, Luhnb O, Balogha E, Shafira G,Antala I. Evaluation of the impact of mixing speed on the compressibility and compactibility of paracetamol-isomalt containing granules with factorial design. Powder Technol 2011;213:132-40.

  20. Singh KS, Dodge J, Durrani MJ, Khan MA. Optimization and characterization of controlled release pellets coated with an experimental latex-I: anionic drug.Int J Pharm 1995;125:243-55.

  21. Franz RM, Browne JE, Lewis AR. Experimental design, modeling and optimization strategies for product and process development. In: Lieberman HA, Rieger MM, Banker GS. editors. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Disperse Systems., New York, NY: Marcel DekkerInc; 1988. p. 427–519.

  22. Mushiroda T, Douya RX, Takahara E, Nagata O. The involvement of flavincontaining monooxygenase but not CYP3A4 in metabolism of itopride hydrochloride, a gastroprokinetic agent: comparison with cisapride and mosapride citrate.Drug Metab Dispos 2000;28:1231-7.

  23. Kubo W, Miyazaki S, Attwood D. Oral sustained delivery of paracetamol from insitu-gelling gellan and sodium alginate formulations. Int JPharm 2003;258:55-64.

  24. Attwood D, Kubo W, Miyazaki S, Itoh K, Fujiwara M, Tomohiro H,et al. The influence of variation of gastric pH on the gelation and release characteristics of insitu gelling pectin formulation.IntJ Pharm 2006;312:37-42.

  25. Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained action medication, Theoretical analysis of rate release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963;52:1145-9.

  26. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int JPharm 1983;15:25-35.

  27. Maheswaran A, Padmavathy J, Nandhini V, Saravanan D, Angel P. Formulation and evaluation of floating oral in situ gel of diltiazem hydrochloride. Int J Appl Pharm 2017;9:50-3.

  28. MonicaRP, Swapnil Uttam S. Controlled release ion sensitive floating oral in situ gel of a prokinetic drug using gellan gum. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2015;49:158-67.

  29. Martin A, James S. Physical chemical principles in the pharmaceutical sciences, physical pharmacy. 3rd ed. Varghese Publishing House, Indian Edition; 1991. p. 513-6.

  30. Miteshkumar J, Kanu Patel R, Mukesh Patel R. Strategy for development of pH triggered floating insitugel of levetiracetam. Am J Pharm Res 2012;2:828-41.

  31. Mahak S, Aarti M, Vishnu Y, Gopkumar P, Sridevi G. Formulation and evaluation of floatable insitugel for stomach-specific drug delivery of vanlafaxine hydrochloride. Res Rev J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;3:41-8.

  32. Sanjoy Kumar D, Pintu Kumar D, Arnab D, Souvik O, Ronita D, Asish Kumar M, et al. Floating mucoadhesive alginate beads of amoxicillin trihydrate: a facile approach for H. pylori eradication. Int J Biol Macromol2016;89:622–31.

  33. Gonzalez L. Fast screening method for the determination of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluroimetric detection. J Chromatogr A 2002;949:49-60.

  34. Sateesha SB, Rajamma AJ, Yogesha HN. Natural gums as sustained release carriers: development of gastroretentive drug delivery system of ziprasidone HCl. Daru J Pharm Sci 2012;20:2-9.

  35. Rajani S, Panna T, Ranendra NS. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of gastroretentive floating drug delivery system of ofloxacin. AsianJ Pharm Sci 2013;8:191-8.

  36. Nanjwade BK, Adichwal SA, Sutar KP.Development and evaluation of glipizide floating tablet J. Drug Delivery Sci Tech 2012;22:327-33.

  37. Alexandar S, Kumar M, Kumudhavalli MV, Umamaheswari D, Jaykar B. Formulation and evaluation of buoyant type of gastro retentive dosage forms of ranolazine tablets. J Pharm Sci Res 2017;9:145-9.

  38. Razavi SMA, Rafe1 A. The effect of pH and calcium ion on rheologicalbehaviour of β-lactoglobulin-basil seed gum mixed gels. Int J Food Sci Technol2013;48:1924-31.

  39. Yadav AV, Shete AS, Mohite VL. Preparation and evaluation of mucilage of ocimum basilicum as a gelling agent. Res J Pharm Technol 2008;1:201-3.

  40. Abraham TE, George M. Ph sensitive alginate-guar gum hydrogel for the controlled delivery of protein drugs. Int J Pharm 2007;335:123-9.

  41. Deng L, Chen J, Zhao Q, Gao B, Ma L, Lian J. Innovative intra gastric ascaridole floating tablets: development optimization and invitro,invivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 2015;496:432–9.

How to cite this article

  • S Prasanthi, M Vidyavathi. Formulation and optimization of buoyant in situ gelling system of valsartan using natural polymer.Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9(10):128-136.

About this article




Valsartan, Natural polymers, OBM, In situ floating gel, Buoyancy studies, 3 Level full factorial design





Additional Links

Manuscript Submission


International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vol. 9, Issue 10, 2017 Page: 128-136

Online ISSN


Authors & Affiliations

S. Prasanthi
Department of Pharmaceutics, Annamacharya College Of Pharmacy, New Boyanapalli, Rajampet-516126, A.P, India

M. Vidyavathi
Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam,Tirupathi-517502.A.P.,India

Article Tools


  • There are currently no refbacks.