DOCKING STUDIES IN TARGET PROTEINS INVOLVED IN ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION MECHANISMS: ALKALOIDS ISOLATED FROM SCUTELLARIA GENUS

Authors

  • Sri Dharani R Department of chemistry, Karpagam University, coimbatore-641021
  • Ranjitha R Department of chemistry, Karpagam University, coimbatore-641021
  • Sripathi R Department of chemistry, Karpagam University, coimbatore-641021
  • Ali Muhammad K S Department of chemistry, Karpagam University, coimbatore-641021
  • Ravi S Department of chemistry, Karpagam University, coimbatore-641021

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i5.12693

Abstract

Objective: In the present work, docking study was performed for 22 selected alkaloids isolated from the genus Scutellaria to evaluate their affinity to bacterial proteins that are known targets for many antibiotics with a different mechanism of action: Inhibitors of cell wall synthesis, inhibitors of nucleic acids synthesis and antimetabolites.

Methods: Molecular docking study was carried out using AutoDock 4.2 version and the visualization result using Chimera 1.10 and Discovery
Studio 4.5.

Result: Among the 22 alkaloids studied, with the DNA gyrase protein 1KZN and a dihydropteroate synthase enzyme 3TYE, the compound scutebarbatine E showed a docking score of −8.5 and −8.7 Kcal/mol, respectively, involving with hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. With respect to MurD ligase involved in cell wall synthesis 1UAG and 2X5O, the compound 6,7,nicotinyl scutebarbatine G fared well with a docking score of −10.1 and −10.2 Kcal/mol, respectively. Scutebarbatine G performed well with respect to 3UDI with binding scores of −9.3 K cal/mol.

Conclusion: Overall, it seems that for the selected alkaloids from the genus Scutellaria, the main mechanism of the action is the inhibition of cell wall
synthesis.

Keywords: Scutebarbatine, Alkaloids, Molecular docking, Antimicrobial studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ali Muhammad K S, Department of chemistry, Karpagam University, coimbatore-641021

Research Scholar, Department of Chemistry

Karpagam Academy of Higher education, Coimbatore-21

References

Tenover FC. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Am J Med 2006;119 6 Suppl 1:S3-10.

Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA. Microbiologia Médica. 5th ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Mosby, Elsevier; 2006.

Calvo J, Martínez-Martínez L. Mecanismos de accion de los antimicrobianos. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2009;27:44-52.

Scholar EM, Pratt WB. The inhibitors of cell wall synthesis, I. Mechanism of action of the penicillins, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and other inhibitors of cell wall synthesis. In: Scholar EM, Pratt WB, editors. The Antimicrobial Drugs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 51-80.

Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. How antibiotics kill bacteria: From targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8(6):423-35.

Kostopoulou, ON, Kourelis TG, Mamos P, Magoulas GE, Kalpaxis DL. Insights into the chloramphenicol inhibition effect on peptidyl transferase. Activity, using two new analogs of the drug. Open Enzyme Inhib J 2009;4:1-10.

Golan DE. Princípios de Farmacologia: A Base Fisiopatológica da Farmacoterapia. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Guanabara Koogan; 2009. p. 547-61.

Brugueras M, Garcia M, Diaz R. Actualidad de las quinolonas. Rev Cubana Farm 2005;39(1):1-15.

Huang L, Crothers K, Atzori C, Benfield T, Miller R, Rabodonirina M, et al. Dihydropteroate synthase gene mutations in Pneumocystis and sulfa resistance. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10(10):1721-8.

Alves MJ, Ferreira IC, Dias J, Teixeira V, Martins A, Pintado M.

A review on antimicrobial activity of mushroom (Basidiomycetes) extracts and isolated compounds. Planta Med 2012;78(16):1707-18.

Alves MJ, Ferreira IC, Froufe HJ, Abreu RM, Martins A, Pintado M. Antimicrobial activity of phenolic compounds identified in wild mushrooms, SAR analysis and docking studies. J Appl Microbiol 2013;115(2):346-57.

Radulovic NS, Blagojevic PD, Stojanovic-Radic ZZ, Stojanovic NM. Antimicrobial plant metabolites: Structural diversity and mechanism of action. Curr Med Chem 2013;20(7):932-52.

Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 2010;31(2):455-61.

Zidar N, Tomasic T, Sink R, Rupnik V, Kovac A, Turk S, et al. Discovery of novel 5-benzylidenerhodanine and 5-benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione inhibitors of MurD ligase. J Med Chem 2010;53(18):6584-94.

Yun MK, Wu Y, Li Z, Zhao Y, Waddell MB, Ferreira AM, et al. Catalysis and sulfa drug resistance in dihydropteroate synthase. Science 2012;335(6072):1110-4.

Bock L, Miller GH, Schaper KJ, Seydel JK. Sulfonamide structure–activity relations in a cell-free system. 2. Proof for the formation of a sulfonamide-containing folate analog. J Med Chem 1974;17(1):23-8.

Roland S, Ferone R, Harvey RJ, Styles VL, Morrison RW. The characteristics and significance of sulfonamides as substrates for Escherichia coli dihydropteroate synthase. J Biol Chem 1979;254(20):10337-45.

Published

01-09-2016

How to Cite

R, S. D., R. R, S. R, A. M. K S, and R. S. “DOCKING STUDIES IN TARGET PROTEINS INVOLVED IN ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION MECHANISMS: ALKALOIDS ISOLATED FROM SCUTELLARIA GENUS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 9, no. 5, Sept. 2016, pp. 121-5, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i5.12693.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)