A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH URINARY CALCULI

  • Shanmugapriya J Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Vels University, Chennai - 600 117, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sathesh Kumar S Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Vels University, Chennai - 600 117, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

 

 Objective: The objective of the study is to compare the quality of life (QoL) in both men and women with urinary calculi using SF-12 questionnaire and also to improve by patient education. Patient counseling can scientifically improve the physical and mental component of certain diseases that could be a relief to the patient. Non-pharmacological approaches could be an alternative to the drug therapy.

Methods: The present study involves prospective study on QoL in patients with urinary calculi. The methodology involves the collection and documentation of general information of the patient including personal history, family background, clinical findings, investigations, and medical illness associated with urinary calculi. Further, quality is documented using SF-12 questionnaire designed to assess the impact of urinary calculi and their complications.

Result: It can be seen that there is an extremely significant (p<0.0001) values were obtained when compared between pre- and post-counseling phases of physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). Patient’s PCS and MCS improved extremely significant in post-counseling.

Conclusion: Patients counseling plays a major role in the management of signs and symptoms among patient with urinary calculi. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of impaired health-related QoL (HRQoL) in stone formers. A new and promising endpoint in the management of urolithiasis is improvement of HRQoL.

Keywords: Quality of life, Urinary calculi, Patient counseling, Questionnaire, Physical component score, Mental component score.

References

1. Macneil F, Bariol S. Urinary stone disease - Assessment and management. Aust Fam Physician 2011;40(10):772-5.
2. Jeong JY, Doo SW, Yang WJ, Lee KW, Kim JM. Differences in urinary stone composition according to body habitus. Korean J Urol 2011;52(9):622-5.
3. Arafa MA, Rabah DM. Study of quality of life and its determinants in patients after urinary stone fragmentation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:119.
4. Penniston KL, Nakada SY. Health related quality of life differs between male and female stone formers. J Urol 2007;178(6):2435-40.
5. Raja A, Zara H, Hrishi BJ. Conducted study on How do urinary calculi influence health-related quality of life and patient treatment preference: A systematic review. J Endourol 2016;30(7):727-43.
6. Lee YH, Huang WC, Tsai JY, Lu CM, Chen WC, Lee MH, et al. Epidemiological studies on the prevalence of upper urinary calculi in Taiwan. Urol Int 2002;68(3):172-7.
7. Rabah DM, Alomar M, Binsaleh S, Arafa MA. Health related quality of life in ureteral stone patients: Post-ureterolithiasis. Urol Res 2011;39(5):385-8.
8. Robertson WG, Heyburn PJ, Peacock M. Increased intake of animal protein may increase the risk of stone-formation. Clin Sci 1979;57:285-8.
Statistics
289 Views | 496 Downloads
Citatons
How to Cite
J, S., and S. Kumar S. “A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH URINARY CALCULI”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2017, pp. 191-3, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i8.18726.
Section
Original Article(s)