A RADIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF FUNGAL SINUSITIS

Authors

  • Suresh Pillai Department of Surgery, ENT Division, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
  • Ajay M Bhandarkar Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka - 576 104, India. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-2512
  • Suraj S Nair HCG Cancer Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Anusha Taarinie Jha Final year MBBS student, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka - 576 104, India
  • Balakrishnan Ramaswamy Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka - 576 104, India.
  • Rashid Al-abri ENT Division, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i9.19837

Keywords:

Fungal sinusitis, Acute invasive fungal sinusitis, Fungus ball, Chronic invasive sinusitis, Allergic fungal sinusitis, Chronic granulomatous sinusitis, Hyperattenuation, Bone erosion, Neo-osteogenesis

Abstract

 

 Objectives: To create a radiological profile of fungal sinusitis and determine the radiological differences between fungal and nonfungal sinusitis based on the presence of hyperattenuation, bony erosion, neo-osteogenesis, air-fluid level, and extrasinus extension.

Methods: This is a retrospective, single-blind, case-control study involving the analysis of 119 computed tomography (CT) scans of the paranasal sinuses. Based on the histopathology, they were divided into cases comprising fungal sinusitis and controls of nonfungal sinusitis. Benign and malignant tumors and previously operated cases of fungal sinusitis were excluded from the study. The principal investigators were blinded to the diagnosis. The comparison parameters were hyperattenuation, the presence of air-fluid level, bone erosion, neo-osteogenesis, and extrasinus extension. Data was analyzed by Chi-square and Fischer exact t-test using SPSS 14.0 software and a p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Our study showed the presence of hyperattenuation, neo-osteogenesis, bone erosion, air-fluid level, extrasinus extension in 75.2%, 48.3%, 25.9%, 36.2%, and 6.9% of the cases and 13.1%, 16.4%, 6.6%, 9.8%, and 0 controls, respectively. All the parameters were statistically significant in cases when compared to controls.

Conclusion: Hyperattenuation, neo-osteogenesis, air-fluid level, bone erosion, and extrasinus extension are the parameters on CT imaging that will help routinely assess and differentiate fungal sinusitis from nonfungal sinusitis with considerable accuracy, although, there is an overlap with malignancy when the parameter of bone erosion is considered as a differential diagnosis of chronic invasive fungal sinusitis. It reiterates the fact that history, clinical examination, and laboratory evaluation hold an important role in provisional diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Suresh Pillai, Department of Surgery, ENT Division, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Senior Consultant

Ajay M Bhandarkar, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka - 576 104, India.

Associate Professor

Suraj S Nair, HCG Cancer Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Fellow

Anusha Taarinie Jha, Final year MBBS student, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka - 576 104, India

Undergraduate Student

Balakrishnan Ramaswamy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka - 576 104, India.

Professor and Head

Rashid Al-abri, ENT Division, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat

Associate Professor

References

Chakrabarti A, Das A, Panda NK. Overview of fungal rhinosinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;56(4):251-8.

Hora JF. Primary aspergillosis of the paranasal sinuses and associated areas. Laryngoscope 1965;75:768-73.

McGill TJ, Simpson G, Healey GB. Fulminant Aspergillosis of the nose and paranasal sinuses: A new clinical entity. Laryngoscope 1980;90:748-54.

Gorovoy IR, Kazanjian M, Kersten RC, Kim HJ, Vagefi MR. Fungal rhinosinusitis and imaging modalities. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2012;26(4):419-26.

deShazo RD, Chapin K, Swain RE. Fungal sinusitis. N Engl J Med 1997;337(4):254-9.

Groppo ER, El-Sayed IH, Aiken AH, Glastonbury CM. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of acute invasive fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137(10):1005-10.

Aribandi M, McCoy VA, Bazan C 3rd. Imaging features of invasive and noninvasive fungal sinusitis: A review. Radiographics 2007;27(5):1283-96.

Mossa-Basha M, Ilica AT, Maluf F, Karakoç Ö, Izbudak I, Aygün N. The many faces of fungal disease of the paranasal sinuses: CT and MRI findings. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013;19(3):195-200.

Momeni AK, Roberts CC, Chew FS. Imaging of chronic and exotic sinonasal disease: Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189 6 Suppl:S35-45.

Silverman CS, Mancuso AA. Periantral soft-tissue infiltration and its relevance to the early detection of invasive fungal sinusitis: CT and MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19(2):321-5.

DelGaudio JM, Swain RE Jr, Kingdom TT, Muller S, Hudgins PA. Computed tomographic findings in patients with invasive fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129(2):236-40.

Dahniya MH, Makkar R, Grexa E, Cherian J, Al-Marzouk N, Mattar M, et al. Appearances of paranasal fungal sinusitis on computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1998;71(843):340-4.

Stringer SP, Ryan MW. Chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000;33(2):375-87.

Reddy CE, Gupta AK, Singh P, Mann SB. Imaging of granulomatous and chronic invasive fungal sinusitis: Comparison with allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;143(2):294-300.

Khattar VS, Hathiram BT. Radiologic appearances in fungal rhinosinusitis. Otorhinolaryngol Clin Int J 2009;1(1):15-23.

Chen JC, Ho CY. The significance of computed tomographic findings in the diagnosis of fungus ball in the paranasal sinuses. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26(2):117-9.

Bent JP 3rd, Kuhn FA. Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111(5):580-8.

Sari-Aslani F, Khademi B, Vatanibaf MR, Noroozi MS. Diagnosis of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Iran J Med Sci 2006;31(4):200-3.

Nussenbaum B, Marple BF, Schwade ND. Characteristics of bony erosion in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124(2):150-4.

Firodiya AD, Tenguria RK. Endophytic fungi: Treasure for anti-cancerous compounds. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2016;8(8):35-42.

Mirmoezzi MS, Yazdi MS, Gholami O. Comparative study on the efficacy of mometasone and fluticasone nasal sprays for treatment of allergic rhinitis. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9(3):211-4.

Published

01-09-2017

How to Cite

Pillai, S., A. M. Bhandarkar, S. S. Nair, A. T. Jha, B. Ramaswamy, and R. Al-abri. “A RADIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF FUNGAL SINUSITIS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 9, Sept. 2017, pp. 331-4, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i9.19837.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)