INTEGRATION OF FETAL MID THIGH SOFT TISSUE THICKNESS IN ULTRASOUND BIRTH WEIGHT ESTIMATION FORMULA INCREASES THE ACCURACY OF FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION NEAR TERM

  • Shripad Hebbar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576 104, Karnataka, India.
  • Sukriti Malaviya Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576 104, Karnataka, India.
  • Sunanda Bharatnur Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576 104, Karnataka, India.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to find whether incorporation of MTSTT in fetal weight estimation formulae which are traditionally based on biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) improves birth weight (BW) estimation.

 Methods: In a prospective observational study, MTSTT was measured within 1 week of delivery in 100 women with term singleton pregnancy along with other standard biometric parameters, i.e. BPD, HC, AC and FL, and MTSTT. Multiple regression analysis was carried out using PHOEBE regression software using different combinations of biometric variables to find out the best fit model of fetal weight estimation. The predicted BW was compared with actual neonatal BW soon after delivery and regression coefficients (R2) were determined for each of prediction models for comparing the accuracies.

 Results: Mean gestational age at delivery was 38.4±1.08 weeks and the BW of neonates varied between 2.18 kg and 4.38 kg (mean ± standard deviation: 3.07±0.43 kg). By adding MTSTT to BPD, HC, AC, and FL, we obtained the formula Log 10 (BW) = −0.14783+0.00725 *BPD +0.00043 *HC +0.00436 *AC +0.01942 *FL +0.16299 *MTSTT, which had a very good Pearson regression coefficient ((r2: 0.89 p<0.001) compared to conventional models based on standard fetal biometry. All prediction models had better strength of correlation when combined with MTSTT (p<0.001). The routine four parameter formula could identify 45% and 80% of fetuses within 5% and 10% weight range; pick up rate was further increased to 61% and 95% by addition of MTSTT.

 Conclusion: It is evident that addition of MTSTT to other biometric variables in models of fetal weight estimation improves neonatal BW prediction (r2=0.89).

Keywords: Fetal weight, Mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness, Ultrasonography.

Author Biography

Shripad Hebbar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576 104, Karnataka, India.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

KMC Manipal

References

1. Murguía-González A, Hernández-Herrera RJ, Nava-Bermea M. Risk factors of birth obstetric trauma. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2013;81:297-303.
2. Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, Dykes AK. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:402-7.
3. Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:57-62.
4. Curti A, Zanello M, De Maggio I, Moro E, Simonazzi G, Rizzo N, et al. Multivariable evaluation of term birth weight: A comparison between ultrasound biometry and symphysis-fundal height. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1328-32.
5. Indraccolo U, Chiocci L, Rosenberg P, Nappi L, Greco P. Usefulness of symphysis-fundal height in predicting fetal weight in healthy term pregnant women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2008;35:205-7.
6. Mortazavi F, Akaberi A. Estimation of birth weight by measurement of fundal height and abdominal girth in parturients at term. East Mediterr Health J 2010;16:553-7.
7. Belete W, Gaym A. Clinical estimation of fetal weight in low resource settings: Comparison of Johnson’s formula and the palpation method. Ethiop Med J 2008;46:37-46.
8. Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Kenney SP, Devoe LD, et al. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates
of birth weight: Experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:72-7.
9. Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:304-9.
10. Mehdizadeh A, Alaghehbandan R, Horsan H. Comparison of clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Am J Perinatol
2000;17:233-6.
11. Shittu AS, Kuti O, Orji EO, Makinde NO, Ogunniy SO, Ayoola OO,et al. Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in
southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr 2007;25:14-23.
12. Campbell S. A short history of sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2013;5:213-29.
13. Wu M, Shao G, Zhang F, Ruan Z, Xu P, Ding H. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasonic examination. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:540-5.
14. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sherman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;150:333-7.
15. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:80-9.
16. Hebbar S. Critical evaluation of various methods of estimating fetal weight by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynecol Ind 2003;53:336-9.
17. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: A sonographic weight standard. Radiology 1991;181:129-33.
18. Kehl S, Schmidt U, Spaich S, Schild RL, Sütterlin M, Siemer J. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:543-8.
19. Kumarasiri S, Wanigasekara R, Wahalawatta L, Jayasinghe L, Padeniya T, Dias T, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight formulae to predict actual birth weight after 34 weeks: Prospective validation study. Ceylon Med J 2013;58:116-21.
20. Cattermole GN, Leung PY, Mak PS, Graham CA, Rainer TH. Mid-arm circumference can be used to estimate children’s weights. Resuscitation 2010;81:1105-10.
21. Chen L, Wu JJ, Chen XH, Cao L, Wu Y, Zhu LJ, et al. Measurement of fetal abdominal and subscapular subcutaneous tissue thickness
during pregnancy to predict macrosomia: A pilot study. PLoS One 2014;9:e93077.
22. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, et al. Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: Their
relationship to neonatal body composition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:441-6.
23. Valensise H, Larciprete G, Arduini D, Lorenzo AD. The fetal body compartments and their detection during pregnancy. A review. Acta
Diabet 2003;40:79-82.
24. Foromouzmehr A, Shahrokh A, Molaei M. Estimation of birth weight using sonographically measured fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness. Iran J Radiol 2004; ???:47-9.
25. Bhat RG, Nathan A, R A, Vasudeva A, Adiga P, Bhat PV, et al. Correlation of fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness by
ultrasound to predict birth weight. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:OC09-11.
26. O’Connor C, Farah N, O’Higgins A, Segurado R, Fitzpatrick C, Turner MJ, et al. Longitudinal measurement of fetal thigh soft tissue
parameters and its role in the prediction of birth weight. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:945-51.
27. Kalantari M, Negahdari A, Roknsharifi S, Qorbani M. A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter,
abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight. Iran J Reprod Med 2013;11:933-8.
28. Scioscia M, Stepniewska A, Trivella G, De Mitri P, Bettocchi S. Estimation of birth weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue
thickness improves the detection of macrosomic fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:1325-8.
29. Abuelghar W, Khairy A, El Bishry G, Ellaithy M, Abd-Elhamid T. Fetal mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness: A novel method for fetal weight estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:1101-8.
30. McGahan JP, Goldberg BB. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd Ed. New York, London: Elsevier; 2008.
31. Shahrokh FA, Molaei M. Estimation of birth weight using sonographically measured fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness. Iran J Radiol 2004;2:47-9.
32. Parretti E, Carignani L, Cioni R, Bartoli E, Borri P, La Torre P, et al. Sonographic evaluation of fetal growth and body composition in
women with different degrees of normal glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2741-8.
33. Bethune M, Bell R. Evaluation of the measurement of the fetal fat layer, intraventricular septum and abdominal circumference percentile
in the prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:586-90.
34. Higgins MF, Russell NM, Mulcahy CH, Coffey M, Foley ME, Mcauliffe FM. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;140:43-7.
35. Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1997;176:28-32.
36. Bernstein IM, Catalano PM. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal body composition for children of diabetic mothers. Invest Radiol
1991;26:722-6.
37. Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Maiorano A, Panella E, et al. Femoral soft tissuethickness as potential parameter
for ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
2006;28:468.
38. Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, et al. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh softtissue thickness in the late third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:314-20.
39. Velusamy S. Comparison of treatment outcome of antihypertensive drugs in the management of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9:287-9.
40. Hebbar S, Kumar S, Amin S, Doizode S. Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy; Is there a need for pharmacological intervention? Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9:186-91.
41. Kiran K, Krishnananda N, Pratap K, Ranjan S, Jyothi, Leslie E, et al. Altered arterial Doppler flow pattern and perinatal outcome in
intrauterine growth restriction. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:425-8.
42. Susmita S, Shankar BS, Prafulla K. Evaluation of fetal weight sonographically using area of Wharton’s jelly and morphology of
umbilical cord. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:253-8.
Statistics
191 Views | 238 Downloads
Citatons
How to Cite
Hebbar, S., S. Malaviya, and S. Bharatnur. “INTEGRATION OF FETAL MID THIGH SOFT TISSUE THICKNESS IN ULTRASOUND BIRTH WEIGHT ESTIMATION FORMULA INCREASES THE ACCURACY OF FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION NEAR TERM”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 11, no. 4, Apr. 2018, pp. 446-9, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i4.23776.
Section
Original Article(s)