COMPARATIVE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES OF CINNARIZINE AND ITS DIFFERENT AVAILABLE MARKETED FORMULATION DRUGS

  • SANJEEV KUMAR Department of Pharmacy, Meerut Institute of Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • AMIN MIR M Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • SARVESH KUMAR Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India.
  • ANUJ KUMAR Department of Chemistry, Government PG College, Kotdwar, Uttarakhand, India.

Abstract

Objective: The main focus of the study was to investigate the marketed formulations of cinnarizine and it is marketed analogous.


Methods: The study involved the analysis of basic pre-formulation studies, namely, physical properties, melting point, Fourier-transform infrared, loss on drying, assay of cinnarizine, standard curve, and partition co-efficient of various marketed tablets of cinnarizine.


Results: Cinnarizine is an H1-receptor antagonist drug which is widely used for the treatment of dynamical sickness, vomiting, and vertigo. In this study, five known marketed formulations of cinnarizine were evaluated for weight variation, hardness, drug content, friability, disintegration time, and in vitro dissolution as well as the drug release kinetics of the tablets. As per the study, the drugs show low disintegration time and good hardness, also in vitro dissolution studies have shown near about 90% drug release at the end of the first 10 min and then cumulative drug release of not less than 92% in the nearby 10 min. Hence, these formulations show lower friability, acceptable taste, and shorter disintegration time which make them suitable to be accepted. Thus, the tablets are good for the use, so allow them to be marketed for the wellbeing of humans.


Conclusion: It had been found that all the tablets show acceptable limits for various parameters of analysis, in a sustained manner. Thus, all the tablets are effective for usage under standard conditions.

Keywords: Antihistamine, Cinnarizine, Bioequivalence, Vertigo, Vomiting

Author Biography

SANJEEV KUMAR, Department of Pharmacy, Meerut Institute of Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Assistant Professor, Department of chemistry

References

1. Li S. Biodegradable polymers: Polyesters. In: Mathiowitz E, editor. Encyclopedia of Controlled Drug Delivery. New York: John Willey and Sons Inc.; 1999. p. 71-3.
2. Streubel A. Drug Delivery to the upper small intestine window using gastroretentive technologies. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2006;6:501-8.
3. Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Dadar, Bombay: Varghese Publishing House Hind Rajasthan Building; 1987. p. 400014.
4. Kesharvani S, Jaiswal PK, Mukerjee A, Singh AK. Formulation and evaluation of metformin hydrochloride loaded floating microspheres. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2019;12:74-82.
5. Patel M, Patel NV, Patel TB. Design and development of rilpivirine nanoparticle containg chitosan using ionic gelation method for HIV infections. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2020;12:113-8.
6. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Indian Pharmacopoeia. Vol. 2. India: Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2010. p. 187-95.
7. Lieberman L, Herbert A, Lachmann L, Schwartz J. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets. Vol. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005. p. 1-69.
8. Halakatti P. Development of mouth dissolving tablets of cinnarizine. Int J Pharm Sci 2010;2:631-40.
9. Ringard J, Hermann AM. Calculation of disintegrant critical conc. In order to optimize tablet disintegration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1997;14:2321-39.
Statistics
34 Views | 49 Downloads
Citatons
How to Cite
KUMAR, S., A. M. M, S. KUMAR, and A. KUMAR. “COMPARATIVE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES OF CINNARIZINE AND ITS DIFFERENT AVAILABLE MARKETED FORMULATION DRUGS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 13, no. 6, May 2020, pp. 209-15, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i6.37384.
Section
Original Article(s)