ROLE OF MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN IN THE ASSESSMENT OF MEDIASTINAL MASSES
Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the evaluation of masses present in the mediastinum and to determine the localization and the common age group exposed to mediastinal masses.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study included 33 males and 21 females’ samples in the age range between 20 to 70 years. The patients who are specifically suspected of mediastinal masses were included in this research study and accumulated the data. The research was conducted between August 2017 to March 2018. The analysis of the data was performed using Microsoft Excel 2010.
Results: Patients were referred for MDCT scan of the chest to the department of radiodiagnosis with a clinical suspicion of a mediastinal mass or who had an abnormal chest radiograph suggestive of mediastinal mass during the study period. The final result of the study clearly indicates that the majority of the patients that fall within the age group of 40–49 years and 50–59 years have the highest probability of occurring mediastinal masses.
Conclusion: The present study concluded that anterior mediastinum is the most usual compartment involving the formation of mediastinal mass, followed by the posterior and middle compartment. MDCT is the modality of choice, which can evaluate mediastinal mass with higher accuracy.
2. Duwe BV, Sterman DH, Musani AI. Tumors of the mediastinum. Chest 2005;128:2893-909.
3. Trupiano JK, Rice TW, Herzog K, Barr FG, Shipley J, Fisher C, et al. Mediastinal synovial sarcoma: Report of two cases with molecular genetic analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:628-30.
4. Dutta P, Patel KK, Choudhury PR. Mediastinal masses: A radiologica l study of 50 cases. IJBR 2014;5:468-73.
5. Zope AM, Kachewar SG, Ghule SS, Lakhkar DL. Computed tomographic evaluation of mediastinal masses. Sch J App Med Sci 2016;4:4388-93.
6. Shashikumar MR., Kumar NL, Rajendra CP, Nanjaraj CN, Kumar P, Manupratap P, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of mediastinal masses. JEMDS 2015;4:9951-62.
7. Visakh T. Variation in the size of abdominal aorta measured on computed tomography. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2018;11:146-8.
8. Fernandes SF, Pradhan A. Estimation of subcarinal angle using minimum intensity projection in computed tomography. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2018;11:383-5.
9. Kaur H, Tiwari P, Dugg P, Ghuman J, Shivhare P, Mehmi RS. Computed tomographic evaluation of mediastinal masses/lesions with contrast enhancement and correlation with pathological diagnosis-a study of 120 cases. J Biomed Graph Comput 2014;4:28.
10. Davis RD, Oldham HN, Sabiston DC. Primary cysts and neoplasms of the mediastinum: Recent changes in clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, management, and results. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:229-37.
11. Strollo DC, de Christenson ML, Jett JR. Primary mediastinal tumors. Part 1: Tumors of the anterior mediastinum. Chest 1997;112:511-22.
12. Takeda SI, Miyoshi S, Akashi A, Ohta M, Minami M, Okumura M, et al. Clinical spectrum of primary mediastinal tumors: A comparison of adult and pediatric populations at a single Japanese institution. J Surg Oncol 2003;83:24-30.
13. Kumar S, Pande S, Baghel P, Bhargav OP. Radiological profile of mediastinal masses with special reference to computed tomography. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2015;4:16280-6.
14. Sones PJ Jr., Torres WE, Colvin RS, Meier WL, Sprawls P, Rogers JV Jr. Effectiveness of CT in evaluating intrathoracic masses. Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:469-75.
15. Glazer HS, Siegel MJ, Sagel SS. Low-attenuation mediastinal masses on CT. Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:1173-7.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.