A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAUDAL BLOCK AND ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK WITH LEVOBUPIVACAINE AND DEXAMETHASONE AS ADDITIVE IN EXTRAPERITONEAL LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES IN PEDIATRICS

Authors

  • SANDHYA GHODKE Department of Anaesthesiology, Rainbow Children Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • MADHAVI RAVINDRA Department of Anaesthesiology, Rainbow Children Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • HIREMATH RN Department of Anaesthesiology, Rainbow Children Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2021.v14i6.41386

Keywords:

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block, Caudal block, Pediatric extra-abdominal surgeries

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus caudal block for post-operative analgesia with levobupivacaine and dexamethasone as additive in extraperitoneal lower abdominal surgeries in pediatrics as there is no available literature showing the same.

Methods: This is a randomized control study carried out between two groups among 50 children (1–8 years of age), both sexes, posted for elective extraperitoneal lower abdominal surgeries after taking informed consent from parents. Fifty children were randomly allocated into two groups, 25 in each group. Caudal epidural (CE) group received general anesthesia and caudal block with 1 ml/kg of 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone. TAP group received general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided TAP block with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone. Data were collected by means of pre-designed format with pre-/post-operative assessment with standardized scores.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 4.84 (SD=2.29). Mean face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability score was low and non-significant before shifting the patient (<2 h post-operative [post-op]) in both the groups. Thereafter from 2 to 12 h, the mean score increased to 4.92 (SD=2.72) in the CE group and 2.92 (SD=2.17) in the TAP group and the difference was statistically significant at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 12 h postoperatively. Mean time to rescue analgesia in the CE group was 4.96 h (SD=4.32) and 5.52 h (SD=7.53) in the TAP group and difference was statistically significant (p=0.000). Mean total rescue analgesic requirement for the CE and TAP groups was 298.40 mg (SD=170.70) and 111.40 mg (SD=138.81) and the difference was also significant. Post-operative complications such as urinary retention and motor blockade were seen in 28% of CE patients, while none of the patients experienced post-operative nausea/vomiting.

Conclusions: Our study showed significant increase in duration of post-operative analgesia among TAP patients with reduced requirement of rescue analgesics and lesser post-operative complications as compared to CE patients

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hurley RW, Wu CL. Acute post-operative pain. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller’s Anaesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 2757-758.

Bosengberg A. Pediatric regional anaesthesia update. Pediatr Anaesth 2004;14:398-402.

Dalens B, Hansanoui A. Caudal anaesthesia in pediatric surgery: Success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg 1989;68:83-9.

Neha K, Sharmila A. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block and caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Int J Sci Res 2015;4:2319-7064.

Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H. Dahl JB. The Transversus abdominis plane block: A valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54:529-35.

Wahba SS, Kamal SM. Analgesic efficacy and outcome of tranversus-abdominis plane block versus low thoracic-epidural analgesia after laparotomy in ischaemic heart disease patients. J Anesth 2014;28:517-23.

Kadam RV, Wijk VR, Moran JI, Miller D. Epidural versus continuous transverses abdominis plane catheter technique for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2013;41:476-81.

Lissauer J, Mancuso K, Merritt C, Prabhakar A, Kaye AD, Urman RD.Evolution of the transversus abdominis plane block and its role in postoperative analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2014;28:117-26.

El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: Description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:763-7.

McDonnell JG, O’Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2007;104:193-7.

O’Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:91.

McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008;106:186-91.

Abdul Jalil RM, Yahya N, Sulaiman O, Wan Mat WR, Teo R, Izaham A, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.2% for transabdominis plane block in providing postoperative analgesia after appendectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2014;52:49-53.

Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2008;107:2056-60.

Bonnet F, Berger J, Aveline C. Transversus abdominis plane block: What is its role in postoperative analgesia? Br J Anaesth 2009;103:468-70.

de Beer DA, Thomas ML. Caudal additives in children--solutions or problems? Br J Anaesth 2003;90:487-98.

El Fawy DM, El Gendy HA. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block for postoperative pain relief in infants and children undergoing surgical pyeloplasty. Ains Shams J Anesthesiol 2014;7:177-81.

Alsadek WM, Al-Gohari MM, Elsonbaty MI, Nassar HM, Alkonaiesy RM. Ultrasound guided TAP block versus ultrasound guided caudal block for pain relief in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Egypt J Anaesth 2015;31:155-60.

Tobias JD. Preliminary experience with transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative pain relief in infants and children. Saudi J Anaesth 2009;3:2-6.

Cheon JK, Park CH, Hwang KT, Choi BY. A comparison between caudal block versus splash block for postoperative analgesia following inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;60:255-9.

Swain A, Deb SN, Sahu S, Samaddar DP. Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. World J Clin Cases 2017;5:307-23.

Jebaraj B, Khanna P, Baidya DK, Maitra S. Efficacy of epidural local anesthetic and dexamethasone in providing postoperative analgesia: A meta-analysis. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:322-7.

Ammar AS, Mahmoud KM. Effect of adding dexamethasone to bupivacaine on transversus abdomins plane block for abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:229-33.

Shanthanna H, Singh B, Guyatt G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal block as compared to noncaudal regional techniques for inguinal surgeries in children. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:890626.

Published

07-06-2021

How to Cite

GHODKE, S., M. RAVINDRA, and H. RN. “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAUDAL BLOCK AND ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK WITH LEVOBUPIVACAINE AND DEXAMETHASONE AS ADDITIVE IN EXTRAPERITONEAL LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES IN PEDIATRICS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 14, no. 6, June 2021, pp. 173-6, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2021.v14i6.41386.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>