ASSESSMENT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE CUFF PRESSURE: FINGER PRESSURE TECHNIQUE VERSUS MINIMUM LEAK TECHNIQUE

Authors

  • POOSARLA VENKATA SURYA LAVANYA Department of Anaesthesia, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-3011
  • MYLAPURAM VENKATA GANESH Department of Anaesthesia, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-9971
  • AMBATI SANTOSHA LAKSHMI Department of Anaesthesia, Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i3.44095

Keywords:

Finger pressure technique, Minimal leak technique, Endotracheal, Cuff pressure, Postoperative complications

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare routinely used cuff insufflation techniques to finger-pressure and minimal leak procedures for achieving safe endotracheal tube (ETT) intracuff pressures in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation.

Methods: It is a prospective observational study conducted in patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia at GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam from January 2019 to June 2020. In Group FP, which includes 50 patients, the ETT cuff (ETTc) was inflated by palpating the pilot balloon between the index finger and thumb until it became taut. When this point was reached, the syringe was detached from the pilot balloon, and a cuff manometer was attached. The pressure reading on the cuff manometer is noted. In Group ML, which includes 50 patients, the ETTc was inflated fully, and then the air was withdrawn slowly from the cuff with auscultation over the trachea until a small leak was heard. When the point was reached, the syringe was detached, and a cuff manometer was attached; pressure readings were noted.

Results: Mean inflation cuff pressure in the FP group was 45.40±21.74 cm H2O and in the ML group was 28.68±8.35 cm H2O. In Group FP, out of 50 patients, cuff pressure in 14 (28%) patients was in the normal range; in 32 (64%) patients, the cuff was over inflated, and in 4 patients (8%) cuff was under inflated. In the group ML, 24 (48%) patients have cuff pressure within the normal range; in 18 (36%) patients, the cuff has been over inflated, and 8 (16%) patients have low cuff pressures. Cuff pressure adjustment was required in 36 patients (72%) in the FP group, whereas 26 patients (52%) in the ML group. ML group has a low incidence of postoperative complications, i.e., 10%, compared to the FP group, i.e., 18%. A positive correlation was seen between the measured cuff pressure and body mass index, Volume of air insufflated.

Conclusion: The main conclusion is to realize the need to use manometers or better-automated controllers during routine anaesthetic procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sengupta P, Sessler DI, Maglinger P, Wells S, Vogt A, Durrani J, et al. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure in three hospitals, and the volume required to produce an appropriate cuff pressure. BMC Anesthesiol 2004;4:8.

Sole ML, Su X, Talbert S, Penoyer DA, Kalita S, Jimenez E, et al. Evaluation of an intervention to maintain endotracheal tube cuff pressure within therapeutic range. Am J Crit Care 2011;20:109-17; quiz 118.

Nseir S, Brisson H, Marquette CH, Chaud P, Di Pompeo C, Diarra M, et al. Variations in endotracheal cuff pressure in intubated critically ill patients: Prevalence and risk factors. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26:229-34.

Blot SI, Poelaert J, Kollef M. How to avoid microaspiration a key element for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated ICU patients. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:119.

Stewart SL, Secrest JA, Norwood BR, Zachary R. A comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures using estimation techniques and direct intracuff measurement. AANA J 2003;71:443-7.

Nseir S, Duguet A, Copin MC, de Jonckheere J, Zhang M, Similowski T, et al. Continuous control of endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal wall damage: A randomized controlled animal study. Crit Care 2007;11:R109.

McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: Cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia 1999;54:444-53.

Wain JC. Post intubation tracheal stenosis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;21:284-9.

Combes X, Schauvliege F, Peyrouset O, Motamed C, Kirov K, Dhonneur G, et al. Intracuff pressure and tracheal morbidity influence of filling cuff with saline during nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1120-4.

American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388-416.

Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2184-93.

Sultan P, Carvalho B, Rose BO, Cregg R. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring: A review of the evidence. J Perioper Pract 2011;21:379-86.

Hoffman RJ, Dahlen JR, Lipovic D, Stürmann KM. Linear correlation of endotracheal tube cuff pressure and volume. West J Emerg Med 2009;10:137-9.

Godoy AC, Vieira RJ, Capitani EM. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure alteration after changes in position in patients under mechanical ventilation. J Bras Pneumol 2008;34:294-7.

Brimacombe J, Keller C, Giampalmo M, Sparr HJ, Berry A. Direct measurement of mucosal pressures exerted by cuff and non-cuff portions of tracheal tubes with different cuff volumes and head and neck positions. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:708-11.

Bernhard WN, Yost L, Joynes D, Cothalis S, Turndorf H. Intracuff pressures in endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes. Related cuff physical characteristics. Chest 1985;87:720-5.

Atlas GM. A mathematical model of differential tracheal tube cuff pressure: Effects of diffusion and temperature. J Clin Monit Comput 2005;19:415-25.

Mitchell V, Adams T, Calder I. Choice of cuff inflation medium during nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1999;54:32-6.

Liu J, Zhang X, Gong W, Li S, Wang F, Fu S, et al. Correlations between controlled endotracheal tube cuff pressure and postprocedural complications: A multicenter study. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1133-7.

Bulamba F, Kintu A, Ayupo N, Kojjo C, Ssemogerere L, Wabule A, et al. Achieving the recommended endotracheal tube cuff pressure: A randomized control study comparing loss of resistance syringe to pilot balloon palpation. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2017;2017:2032748.

Das S, Kumar P. Comparison of minimal leak test and manual cuff pressure measurement technique method for inflating the endotracheal tube cuff. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2015;2:78-81.

Published

07-03-2022

How to Cite

SURYA LAVANYA, P. V., M. V. GANESH, and A. S. LAKSHMI. “ASSESSMENT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE CUFF PRESSURE: FINGER PRESSURE TECHNIQUE VERSUS MINIMUM LEAK TECHNIQUE”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 15, no. 3, Mar. 2022, pp. 108-12, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i3.44095.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)