• SABA MOHSIN SIDDIQUI Consultant Dermatologist and Cosmetologist, Cloud 9 Hospital, Vashi, Maharashtra, India.
  • YOGANAND J PHULARI Department of Dermatology and STD, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Kadamwadi, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.
  • RAVISHEKAR N HIREMATH Department of Community Medicine, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
  • CHETAN PATIL Department of Dermatology, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
  • PRIYANKA PATEL Assistant Hospital Administrator, GMERS Medical College and General Hospital, Himmatnagar, Gujarat, India.




Mycology, Dermatophytic, Infections


Background: The epidemiology of dermatophytic infection is influenced by the changing patterns of migration, growth in tourism, immunocompetence of the host, pathogenicity of the infectious agents, availability of medical treatment, and changes in socioeconomic conditions.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to assess the epidemiological profile, clinical types, and association between the etiological agent isolated and the clinical type of dermatophytic infections.

Methods: An observational prospective study was carried out at large tertiary care hospital in Southern Maharashtra, India. 110 Participants were selected based on Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collection was done with help of personal interview and detailed examination by investigator using predesigned, pre-tested, and structured questionnaire. All patients were followed up in dermatology department till complete investigation, treatment, and discharge.

Results: Patients belonging to 21−40 year constituted 45% of the study population. Male to female ratio was 3:1. About 51.82% belonged to low socio-economic status and 56.36% were from rural areas. The most common isolate obtained was Trichophyton rubrum (25.45%) followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes (7.27%). Out of the 110 samples collected, 66.36% (73 samples) were KOH positive and 35.45% (39 samples) were culture positive. The most common type of mixed dermatophytic infection was Tinea Corporis with Tinea Cruris (38.46%) followed by Tinea Manuum with Tinea Unguium (30.77%). Mixed type was seen more commonly in 21−40 years age group (30.77%). Association of isolate and the clinical type involved among study participants was assessed by applying Chi-square test which showed no statistical significance (p=0.94). Similarly, association of results of KOH mount and culture report to clinical types also showed no statistical significance (p=0.94). However, when association of age and sex with clinical types was assessed, age showed statistically significant association (p=0.004) while sex showed no statistical significance (p=0.32).

Conclusions: Incidence of dermatophytosis was maximum in rural areas, low socioeconomic group and in summer. Thus, changing environmental and socio-economic conditions often led to changing epidemiology of dermatophytic infections. Tinea corporis was found to be the commonest clinical type followed by Tinea cruris. T. rubrum was the commonest isolate obtained (25.45%). Fungi were demonstrated by direct microscopy and/or by culture in 73 cases (66.36%) out of 110 cases. Hence, direct microscopy with or without culture is an important diagnostic tool in dermatophytosis. Authors recommend more in-depth study with larger sample size and multicentric based to have clearer picture of dermatophytosis.


Download data is not yet available.


Rashmi P, Mahale R, Rao R, Tejashree A, Deepashree R, Kulkarni M. Clinicomycological profile of dermatophytosis in a teaching hospital. Int J Pharm Sci Invent 2014;3:43-6.

Rao A. Mycotic diseases in India – A critical review. In: Bulletin of School of Tropical Medicine. Calcutta: 1959; 13-22.

Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycoses 2008;51 Suppl 4:2-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x, PMID 18783559

Elewski BE. Tinea capitis: A current perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:1-20. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90001-x, PMID 10607315

Sahoo AK, Mahajan R. Management of tinea corporis, tinea cruris, and tinea pedis: A comprehensive review. Indian Dermatol Online J 2016;7:77-86. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.178099, PMID 27057486

Habif TP. Chapter 13. Superficial fungal infections. In: Habif TP, editor. Clinical Dermatology: A Color Guide to Diagnosis and Therapy. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016.

Lakshmanan A, Ganeshkumar P, Mohan SR, Hemamalini M, Madhavan R. Epidemiological and clinical pattern of dermatomycoses in rural India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2015;33 Suppl:134-6. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.150922, PMID 25657132

Sharma Y, Jain S, Chandra K, Khurana VK, Kudesia M. Clinico-mycological evaluation of dermatophytes and non-dermatophytes isolated from various clinical samples: A study from north India. J Res Med Sci 2012;17:817-8. PMID 23798955

Sahai S, Mishra D. Change in spectrum of dermatophytes isolated from superficial mycoses cases: First report from Central India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011;77:335-6. doi: 10.4103/0378- 6323.79718, PMID 21508578

Foster KW, Ghannoum MA, Elewski BE. Epidemiologic surveillance of cutaneous fungal infection in the United States from 1999 to 2002. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:748-52. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(03)02117-0, PMID 15097959

Kaur R, Panda PS, Sardana K, Khan S. Mycological pattern of dermatomycoses in a tertiary care hospital. J Trop Med 2015;2015:157828. doi: 10.1155/2015/157828

Shah SK, Kilari M, Shah NK. Clinico-mycological study of superficial fungal infections in coastal Karnataka, India. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2013;2:8638-46.

Karmakar S, Kalla G, Joshi KR, Karmakar S. Dermatophytoses in a desert district of Western Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1995;61:280-3. PMID 20952989

Teklebirhan G, Bitew A. Prevalence of dermatophytic infection and the spectrum of dermatophytes in patients attending a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2015;2015:653419. doi: 10.1155/2015/653419, PMID 26448763

Bhatia VK, Sharma PC. Epidemiological studies on Dermatophytosis in human patients in Himachal Pradesh, India. Springerplus 2014;3:134. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-134, PMID 25674437

Hanumanthappa H, Sarojini K, Shilpashree P, Muddapur SB. Clinicomycological study of 150 cases of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Indian J Dermatol 2012;57:322-3. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.97684, PMID 22837576

Balakumar S, Rajan S, Thirunalasundari T, Jeeva S. Epidemiology of dermatophytosis in and around Tiruchirapalli, Tamilnadu, India. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2012;2:286-9. doi: 10.1016/S2222-1808(12)60062-0

Siddappa K, Mahipal OA. Dermatophytoses in Davangere. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1982;48:254-9. PMID 28193927

Malik A, Fatima N, Khan PA. A clinico-mycological study of superficial mycoses from a tertiary care hospital of a North Indian town. Virol Mycol 2014;3:135.

Khadka S, Sherchand JB, Pokharel DB, Pokhrel BM, Mishra SK, Dhital S, et al. Clinicomycological characterization of superficial mycoses from a tertiary care Hospital in Nepal. Dermatol Res Pract 2016;2016:9509705. doi: 10.1155/2016/9509705, PMID 28003819



How to Cite

SIDDIQUI, S. M., Y. J. PHULARI, R. N. HIREMATH, C. PATIL, and P. PATEL. “A CLINICO-MYCOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF DERMATOPHYTIC INFECTIONS – A SINGLE CENTRE PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 15, no. 4, Feb. 2022, pp. 122-6, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i4.44454.



Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)