TO ASSESS THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER PARAMETERS USING PENTACAM IN PRIMARY ANGLE CLOSURE SUSPECTS FOLLOWING PERIPHERAL LASER IRIDOTOMY

Authors

  • MONIKA NETAM Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • RAJINDER SINGH Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • SURINDER KAUR Department of Pedodontics, Government Dental College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • JATIN THUKRAL Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-6650
  • HARBIR KAUR Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • SURMILA MEENA Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • PAWANDEEP KAUR Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i12.45619

Keywords:

Primary Angle Closure Suspects, Laser Peripheral Iridotomy, Pentacam, Glaucoma, Anterior Chamber

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to study the changes in anterior chamber parameters before and after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in primary angle closure suspects (PACS) using pentacam.

Methods: This was a prospective, non-randomized, and interventional study which was conducted on 40 patients of PACS attending the Outpatient Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala. Evaluation of the anterior segment of the eye was done by Pentacam (Oculus) using rotating Scheimpflug imaging technology, before and after LPI.

Results: Following LPI, anterior chamber volume (ACV) increased from 90.13±9.82 mm3 to 105.8±11.5 mm3; anterior chamber angle (ACA) increased from 27.01±3.23 degree to 28.13±2.29 degree. Peripheral anterior chamber depth (PACD) at 4 mm increased significantly in superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrant in all cases.

Conclusion: LPI serves both prophylactic and therapeutic benefit in PACS by increasing the ACV, ACA, and PACD, and thus preventing glaucoma. Pentacam is a useful tool to assess the efficacy of LPI and can guide further course of treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

RAJINDER SINGH, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.

JATIN THUKRAL, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

MBBS student, Batch 2016, Government Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.

HARBIR KAUR, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

MBBS student, Batch 2016, Government Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India

SURMILA MEENA, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

PG student, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

References

Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Rhee DJ.

Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224, PMID 16488940

Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:238-42. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.238, PMID 11815354

Stamper RL, Lieberman MF, Drake MV. Becker Shaffer’s Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas. 8th ed. United States: Mosby; 2009.

Wojciechowski R, Congdon N, Anninger W, Teo Broman A. Age, gender, biometry, refractive error, and the anterior chamber angle among Alaskan Eskimos. Ophthalmology 2003;110:365-75. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01748-7, PMID 12578783

Sherpa D, Badhu BP. Association between axial length of the eye and primary angle closure glaucoma. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2008;6:361-3. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v6i3.1712

Qi Y. Ultrasonic evaluation of the lens thickness to axial length factor in primary closure angle glaucoma. Yan Ke Xue Bao 1993;9:12-4. PMID 8253175

Marchini G. Biometric data and pathogenesis of angle closure glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 2002;236:13-4. doi: 10.1034/ j.1600-0420.80.s236.3.x, PMID 12390109

George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, Ramesh SV, Raju P, Arvind H, et al. Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma: A population-based survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:399-402. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.4.399, PMID 12642298

Tiedeman JS. A physical analysis of the factors that determine the contour of the iris. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:338-43. doi: 10.1016/ s0002-9394(14)72319-0, PMID 2000904

Pavlin CJ, Ritch R, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in plateau iris syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:390-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(14)76160-4, PMID 1558112

Quigley HA. What’s the choroid got to do with angle closure? Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:693-4. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.80, PMID 19433722

Aung T, Chew PT. Review of recent advancements in the understanding of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002;13:89- 93. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200204000-00006, PMID 11880721

Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: The role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:211-25. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.12.002, PMID 19298900

Quigley HA, Friedman DS, Congdon NG. Possible mechanisms of primary angle-closure and malignant glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2003;12:167-80. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00013, PMID 12671473

Brubaker RF, Pederson JE. Ciliochoroidal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol 1983;27:281-9. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(83)90228-x, PMID 6407132

Hung LF, Wallman J, Smith EL 3rd. Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1259-69. PMID 10798639

Papastergiou GI, Schmid GF, Riva CE, Mendel MJ, Stone RA, Laties AM. Ocular axial length and choroidal thickness in newly hatched chicks and one-year-old chickens fluctuate in a diurnal pattern that is influenced by visual experience and intraocular pressure changes. Exp Eye Res 1998;66:195-205. doi: 10.1006/exer.1997.0421, PMID 9533845

Schuman JS, Massicotte EC, Connolly S, Hertzmark E, Mukherji B, Kunen MZ. Increased intraocular pressure and visual field defects in high resistance wind instrument players. Ophthalmology 2000;107:127- 33. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00015-9, PMID 10647731

Snow JT. Value of prophylactic peripheral iridectomy on the second eye in angle-closure glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962) 1977;97:189-91. PMID 271393

Edwards RS. Behaviour of the fellow eye in acute angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:576-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.9.576

Lowe RF. Persistent symptoms after peripheral iridectomy for angle-closure glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1987;15:83-7.

European glaucoma society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 4th edition-chapter 3: Treatment principles and options supported by the EGS foundation: Part 1: Foreword; Introduction; Glossary; Chapter 3 treatment principles and options. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101:130-95.

Prum BE Jr., Herndon LW Jr., Moroi SE, Mansberger SL, Stein JD, Lim MC, et al. Primary angle closure preferred practice pattern (®) guidelines. Ophthalmology 2016;123:P1-40.

Lam DS, Tham CC, Congdon NG, Baig N. Peripheral Iridotomy for Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Glaucoma. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. p. 708-15.

Radhakrishnan S, Chen PP, Junk AK, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Chen TC. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure: A report by the American academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2018;125:1110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.015, PMID 29482864

Jain R, Grewal D, Grewal SP. Quantitative analysis of anterior chamber following peripheral laser iridotomy using Pentacam in eyes with primary angle closure. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013;23:55-60.

Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SP. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:341-47. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.33819, PMID 17699942

Shaffer RN. Primary glaucomas. Gonioscopy, ophthalmoscopy and perimetry. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1960;64:112-27.

Lowe RF. Persistent symptoms after peripheral iridectomy for angle-closure glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1987;15:83-7. doi: 10.1111/ j.1442-9071.1987.tb00309.x, PMID 3593567

Gazzard G, Friedman DS, Devereux JG, Chew P, Seah SK. A prospective ultrasound biomicroscopy evaluation of changes in anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology 2003;110:630-8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01893- 6, PMID 12623834

Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Skorpik C. Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:858-61. doi: 10.1097/01. opx.0000177804.53192.15, PMID 16189497

Lee JR, Choi JY, Kim YD, Choi J. Laser peripheral iridotomy with Iridoplasty in primary angle closure suspect: Anterior chamber analysis by Pentacam. Korean J Ophthalmol 2011;25:252-6. doi: 10.3341/ kjo.2011.25.4.252, PMID 21860572

Acet Y, Yigit FU, Onur IU, Agachan A, Tugcu B, Orum O. The course of the changes in anterior chamber parameters after laser peripheral iridotomy: Follow up for 6 months with a Scheimpug-Placido disc topographer. J Glaucoma 2016;25:14-21.

Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Mongolia. A population-based survey in Hovsgol Province, Northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1235-41. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140435011, PMID 8859083

Arkell SM, Lightman DA, Sommer A, Taylor HR, Korshin OM, Tielsch JM. The prevalence of glaucoma among Eskimos of Northwest Alaska. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:482-5. doi: 10.1001/ archopht.1987.01060040052031, PMID 3566600

Okabe I, Tomita G, Sugiyama K, Taniguchi T. An epidemiological study on the prevalence of the narrow chamber angle in Japanese. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1991;95:279-87. PMID 1872206

Jain R, Grewal D, Grewal SP. Pentacam Evaluation of Changes in Anterior Chamber Depth and Volume in Cases with Primary Angle Closure after Instillation of Pilocarpine. Presented at: The XXIV Annual Congress of ESCRS; 2006. Vol. 9-13. London, United Kingdom.

Oka N, Otori Y, Okada M, Miki A, Maeda N, Tano Y. Clinical study of anterior ocular segment topography in angle-closure glaucoma using the three-dimensional anterior segment analyser Pentacam. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2006;110:398-403. PMID 16764322

Esmaeili A, Barazandeh B, Ahmadi S, Haghi A, Hosseini SM,Abolbashari F. Assessment of the anterior chamber parameters after laser iridotomy in primary angle closer suspect using Pentacamand Gonioscopy. Int J Ophthalmol 2013;6:680-4.

Talajic JC, Lesk MR, Nantel-Battista M, Harasymowycz PJ. Anterior segment changes after pilocarpine and laser iridotomy for primary angle-closure suspects with Scheimpflug photography. J Glaucoma 2013;22:776-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318259505a, PMID 22668977

Vryonis N, Nikita E, Vergados I, Theodossiadis P, Filippopoulos T. Anterior chamber morphology before and after laser peripheral iridotomy determined by Scheimpflug technology in white patients with narrow angles. J Glaucoma 2013;22:679-83. doi: 10.1097/ IJG.0b013e318264b908, PMID 22828006

Schwenn O, Sell F, Pfeiffer N, Grehn F. Prophylactic Nd: YAG-laser iridotomy versus surgical iridectomy: A randomized, prospective study. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4:374-9. PMID 8751104

Ramani KK, Mani B, George RJ, Lingam V. Follow-up of primary angle closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy and A-scan biometry for a period of 2 years. J Glaucoma 2009;18:521-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c12d, PMID 19745666

Faramarzi A, Yazdani S, Pakravan M. Central anterior chamber depth changes after prophylactic laser iridotomy. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:707- 10. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182968c62, PMID 23748845

Li S, Wang H, Mu D, Fu J, Wang X, Wang J, et al. Prospective evaluation of changes in anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in Chinese eyes by rotating Scheimpflug camera imaging. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;38:10-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02205.x. PMID 20447095

Antoniazzi E, Pezzotta S, Delfino A, Bianchi PE. Anterior chamber measurements taken with Pentacam: An objective tool in laser iridotomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010;20:517-22. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000325, PMID 20037901

Aboleila A, El-Sharkawy H, Abd El Ghafar AA, Ghanem AA. Evaluation of anterior segment changes following laser peripheral iridotomy by Scheimpflug imaging. ARC J Ophthalmol 2018;3:13-6.

Jain R, Grewal D, Grewal SP. Quantitative analysis of anterior chamber following peripheral laser iridotomy using Pentacam in eyes with primary angle closure. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012; ???:???. doi: 10.5301/ ejo.5000158, PMID 22610719

Yuen NS, Cheung P, Hui SP. Comparing brimonidine 0.2% to Apraclonidine 1.0% in the prevention of intraocular pressure elevation and their pupillary effects following laser peripheral iridotomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2005;49:89-92. doi: 10.1007/s10384-004-0149-9, PMID 15838723

Shani L, David R, Tessler Z, Rosen S, Schneck M, Yassur Y. Intraocular pressure after neodymium: YAG laser treatments in the anterior segment. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:455-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886- 3350(13)80184-8, PMID 7932138

Robin AL, Pollack IP. A comparison of neodymium: YAG and argon laser iridotomies. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1011-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161- 6420(84)34199-9, PMID 6387569

Schrems W, Eichelbrönner O, Krieglstein GK. The immediate IOP response of Nd-YAG-laser iridotomy and its prophylactic treatability. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1984;62:673-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1755- 3768.1984.tb05794.x, PMID 6548856

Published

07-12-2022

How to Cite

NETAM, M., R. SINGH, S. KAUR, J. THUKRAL, H. KAUR, S. MEENA, and P. KAUR. “TO ASSESS THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER PARAMETERS USING PENTACAM IN PRIMARY ANGLE CLOSURE SUSPECTS FOLLOWING PERIPHERAL LASER IRIDOTOMY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 15, no. 12, Dec. 2022, pp. 134-40, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i12.45619.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)