DRUG UTILIZATION STUDY IN A RADIOTHERAPY UNIT OF A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL IN RURAL WEST BENGAL, INDIA

Authors

  • ANANYA MANDAL Department of Pharmacology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  • TANMOY GANGOPADHYAY Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  • SONAI MANDAL Department of Pharmacology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i11.45709

Keywords:

Drug utilization study, Anticancer chemotherapy, Generic prescriptions, Prescription

Abstract

Objective: Drug utilization studies lay special emphasis on the medical social and economic consequences of use of medications in special settings. This study was undertaken to identify the pattern of drugs prescribed frequently among patients attending the radiotherapy department.

Methods: This is a prospective study undertaken between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Prescriptions and patient records were reviewed and analyzed using the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators for drug utilization studies.

Results: We encountered a total of 618 patients during the study period. Among them, 340 (55.01%) were female. The most common age groups presenting were between 21 and 60 years. Carcinoma breast was the most common type encountered (total cases 181, 29.28%), followed by carcinoma lung (total cases 92, 14.88%), carcinoma cervix, hematological malignancies, carcinoma prostate, and carcinoma rectum. Total number of drugs prescribed was 3008 in total 618 prescriptions making it 4.86 drugs per prescription on average. Among them on average per prescription, 2.82 drugs were cytotoxic drugs (1745 total), whereas 2.04 drugs were supportive or adjunct drugs (1263 total). Among the drugs prescribed, 96.24% were in generic names, 6.95% prescriptions contained antibiotics, and 96.44% (596) prescriptions contained injections. About 85.23% of drugs were prescribed from essential drug list. Average consulting was 8.2 min and dispensing time for adjunct drugs was 4 min on average. On average, 52.42% of patients (324) had complete correct knowledge of the dosage and schedule prescribed. Adverse drug reactions were common, out of 618 patients, 542 (87.7%) experienced ADRs most common being gastrointestinal and dermatological ADRs. The most common implicated drug was cisplatin. Six serious adverse events were encountered.

Conclusions: This study provides a clear picture of drug use in this special clinic in rural Bengal and paves the way for larger and long-term study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

TANMOY GANGOPADHYAY, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal

SONAI MANDAL, Department of Pharmacology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India.

Associate Professor Pharmacology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal.

References

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 Cancersin 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.

India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators. The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990-2016. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:1289-306. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30447-9, PMID 30219626

Gudiol C, Carratalà J. Antibiotic resistance in cancer patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014;12:1003-16. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.920253, PMID 24834465

World Health Organization. Introduction to Drug Utilization Research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: https:// www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42627/924156234X. pdf [Last accessed on 2022 Jun 29].

Kumar BS, Maria S, Shejila CH, Udaykumar P. Drug utilization review and cost analysis of anticancer drugs used in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Pharm Sci 2018;80:686-93. doi: 10.4172/ pharmaceutical-sciences.1000408

Kalaiselvan V, Srivastava S, Singh A, Gupta SK. Pharmacovigilance in India: Present scenario and future challenges. Drug Saf 2019;42:339-46. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0730-7, PMID 30269244

Voll ML, Yap KD, Terpstra WE, Crul M. Potential drug-drug interactions between anti-cancer agents and community pharmacy dispensed drugs. Pharm World Sci 2010;32:575-80. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9410-0, PMID 20645002

World Health Organization. Core Drug Use Indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: https://www.apps.who. int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js2289e/3.1.html#Js2289e.3 [Last accessed on 2022 Jun 29].

Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;30:239-45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154, PMID 7249508

Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992;49:2229-32. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/49.9.2229, PMID 1524068

Sharma A, Kumari KM, Manohar HD, Bairy KL, Thomas J. Pattern of adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Perspect Clin Res 2015;6:109-15. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.154014, PMID 25878957

Dave DJ, Pillai A, Shah DV, Agarwal S, Goel A. An analysis of utilization pattern of anticancer drugs in diagnosed cases of carcinoma in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci 2014;4:251-9.

Sneha G, Aparna S, Srilakhshmi BN, Varma AS, Naidu DS. Adjunctive drug utilization pattern in oncology department of a tertiary care hospital in South India. Indo Am J Pharm Res 2015;5:1297-303.

Siddiqua A, Jafar H, Tabassum N, Firdous S, Tabassum K. Drug utilization evaluation of anti cancer drugs. Am J PharmTech Res 2014;4:690-702.

Sunny S, Thampi A, Shetty N, Babasahib SK, Chacko C, Johnkennedy J. Assessment of adverse effects of most commonly prescribed anticancer drugs in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Pharm Pract 2017;10:270-5.

Ali I, Wani WA, Saleem K. Cancer scenario in India with future perspectives. Cancer Ther 2011;8:56-70.

Mugada V, Paruchuri A, Munagala M. Drug utilization evaluation of anti cancer drugs in a tertiary care teaching hospital: A descriptive observational study. J Appl Pharm Sci 2016;6:98-101.

Mathew M, Mateti UV, Saj N, Philip ML, Shetty V. Drug utilization evaluation of anticancer drugs in a charitable hospital. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2019;40:105-10. doi: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_156_18

Poddar S, Sultana R, Sultana R, Akbor MM, Azad MA, Hasnat A. Pattern of adverse drug reaction due to cancer chemotherapy in tertiary care teaching hospital in Bangladesh. Dhaka Univ J Pharm Sci 2009;8:11-6. doi: 10.3329/dujps.v8i1.5330

Prasad A, Datta PP, Bhattacharya J, Pattanayak C, Chauhan AS, Panda P. Pattern of adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. J Pharmacovigilance 2013;1:107-10.

Published

07-11-2022

How to Cite

MANDAL, A., T. GANGOPADHYAY, and S. MANDAL. “DRUG UTILIZATION STUDY IN A RADIOTHERAPY UNIT OF A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL IN RURAL WEST BENGAL, INDIA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 15, no. 11, Nov. 2022, pp. 126-30, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i11.45709.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)