EFFECT OF VARIOUS IRRIGANTS ON DENTAL BIOFILM: A REVIEW

  • Preetha S Saveetha University
  • James D Raj Saveetha University

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Objective: The objective of the article is to describe in brief the various endodontic irrigants on dental biofilm.
Method: Articles based on various endodontic irrigants and dental biofilm were searched in an iterative manner from journals,books and sites such
as PubMed.
Result: It was found out that sodium hypochlorite is more effective on dental biofilms than chlorhexidine, MTAD, EDTA, herbal irrigants and new
irrigants such as Qmix and tetraclean.
Conclusion: Disinfection of root canal system is done using mechanical instrumentation,chemical irrigation along with medication.Sodium
hypochlorite an excellent antibacterial agent,is the most commonly used and is more effective than other irrigants on dental biofilm.
Keywords: Irrigants, Dental biofilm, Antimicrobial resistance, Sodium hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, Tetraclean, Herbal irrigants.

Author Biographies

Preetha S, Saveetha University
Senior intern
James D Raj, Saveetha University

Senior Lecturer

Conservative dentistry and Endodontics

References

REFERENCES
1. Jaju S, Jaju PP. Newer root canal irrigants in horizon: A review. Int J Dent 2011;2011:851359.
2. Jenkinson HF, Lappin-Scott HM. Biofilms adhere to stay. Trends Microbiol 2001;9(1):9-10.
3. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;30(5):297-306.
4. Mohammadi Z, Soltani MK, Shalavi S. An update on the management of endodontic biofilms using root canal irrigants and medicaments. Iran Endod J 2014;9(2):89-97.
5. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 2008. p. 85-268.
6. Ramachandran Nair PN. Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and periapical lesions. J Endod 1987;13(1):29-39.
7. George S, Kishen A, Song KP. The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2005;31(12):867-72.
8. Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod 2002;28(10):689-93.
9. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Cervone F. Periapical bacterial plaque in teeth refractory to endodontic treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6(2):73-7.
10. Lomçali G, Sen BH, Cankaya H. Scanning electron microscopic observations of apical root surfaces of teeth with apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12(2):70-6.
11. Siqueira JF. Periapical actinomycosis and infection with propionibacterium propionicum. Endod Top 2003;6(1):78-95.
12. Figdor D, Sjögren U, Sörlin S, Sundqvist G, Nair PN. Pathogenicity of Actinomyces israelii and Arachnia propionica: Experimental infection in guinea pigs and phagocytosis and intracellular killing by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1992;7(3):129-36.
13. Svensäter G, Bergenholtz G. Biofilms in endodontic infections. Endod Top 2004;9(1):27-36.
14. Magar S, Palekar A, Magar S, Mosby S. Endodontic biofilm a review. NJDSR 2014;2:1.
15. Johnson WT, Noblett WC. Cleaning and shaping. In: Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2009.
16. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):424-8.
17. Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 2000;26(12):751-5.
18. Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Effect of MTAD on Enterococcus faecalis-contaminated root canals of extracted human teeth. J Endod 2003;29(9):576-9.
19. Spratt DA, Pratten J, Wilson M, Gulabivala K. An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates. Int Endod J 2001;34(4):300-7.
20. Ozok AR, Wu MK, Luppens SB, Wesselink PR. Comparison of growth and susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite of mono- and dual-species biofilms of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Peptostreptococcus (micromonas) micros. J Endod 2007;33(7):819-22.
21. Giardino L, Ambu E, Savoldi E, Rimondini R, Cassanelli C, Debbia EA. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and Tetraclean against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Endod 2007;33(7):852-5.
22. Dunavant TR, Regan JD, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, Honeyman AL. Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod 2006;32(6):527-31.
23. Lundstrom JR, Williamson AE, Villhauer AL, Dawson DV, Drake DR. Bactericidal activity of stabilized chlorine dioxide as an endodontic irrigant in a polymicrobial biofilm tooth model system. J Endod 2010;36(11):1874-8.
24. Clegg MS, Vertucci FJ, Walker C, Belanger M, Britto LR. The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin biofilms in vitro. J Endod 2006;32(5):434-7.
25. Hülsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation – Literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 2000;33(3):186-93.
26. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32(5):389-8.
27. Torabinejad M, Shabahang S, Aprecio RM, Kettering JD. The antimicrobial effect of MTAD: An in vitro investigation. J Endod 2003;29(6):400-3.
28. Yoshida T, Shibata T, Shinohara T, Gomyo S, Sekine I. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of EDTA solution as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 1995;21(12):592-3.
29. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002;28(1):17-9.
30. .Calt S, Serper A. Smear layer removal by EDTA. J Endod 2000;26:459‑61.
31. Paul ML, Mazumdar D, Niyogi A, Baranwal AK. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different irrigants including MTAD under SEM. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(4):336-41.
32. Estrela C, Silva JA, de Alencar AH, Leles CR, Decurcio DA. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 8, Issue 4, 2015, 13-16
Preetha and Raj
16
faecalis – A systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16(6):364-8.
33. Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira FB. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(5):702-6.
34. Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99(6):768-72.
35. Delany GM, Patterson SS, Miller CH, Newton CW. The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canal flora of freshly extracted necrotic teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53(5):518-23.
36. Shah N, Singh S, Gupta U. Antimicrobial potency of lodine-potassium lodide, chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite as root canal irrigants: An in vitro study. Endodontology 1990;2(2):19-23.
37. Vahdaty A, Pitt Ford TR, Wilson RF. Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9(6):243-8.
38. Heling I, Sommer M, Steinberg D, Friedman M, Sela MN. Microbiological evaluation of the efficacy of chlorhexidine in a sustained-release device for dentine sterilization. Int Endod J 1992;25(1):15-9.
39. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, Cho Y, Johnson WB, Bozhilov K, et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2003;29(3):170-5.
40. Johnson WT, Noblett WC. Cleaning and shaping. In: Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2008.
41. Williamson AE, Cardon JW, Drake DR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of monoculture biofilms of a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2009;35(1):95-7.
42. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Qian W, Johnson B, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMiX. Int Endod J 2012;45(4):363-71.
43. Adigüzel O, Yiğit-Özer S, Kaya S, Uysal İ, Ganidağli-Ayaz S, Akkuş Z. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112(6):803-8.
44. Dadresanfar B, Khalilak Z, Delvarani A, Mehrvarzfar P, Vatanpour M, Pourassadollah M. Effect of ultrasonication with EDTA or MTAD on smear layer, debris and erosion scores. J Oral Sci 2011;53(1):31-6.
45. Tong Z, Zhou L, Li J, Jiang W, Ma L, Ni L. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activities of MTAD in combination with nisin against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2011;37(8):1116-20.
46. Pitoni CM, Figueiredo MC, Araújo FB, Souza MA. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and citric acid solutions for smear layer removal in primary tooth root canals. J Dent Child (Chic) 2011;78(3):131-7.
47. Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. J Endod 2006;32(11):1091-3.
48. Chandrasekar V, Amulya V, Rani VS, Prakash TJ, Ranjani AS, Gayathri C. Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant QmixTM2 in an in vivo study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(1):36-40.
49. Alkahtani A, Alkahtany SM, Mahmood A, Elsafadi MA, Aldahmash AM, Anil S. Cytotoxicity of QMixâ„¢ endodontic irrigating solution on human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:27.
50. Huth KC, Quirling M, Maier S, Kamereck K. Effectiveness of ozone against endodontopathogenic microorganisms in a root canal biofilm model. Int Endod J 2009;42:3-13.
51. Hems RS, Gulabivala K, Ng YL, Ready D, Spratt DA. An in vitro evaluation of the ability of ozone to kill a strain of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2005;38:22-9.
52. Vani T, Rajani M, Sarkar S, Shishoo CJ. Antioxidant properties of the ayurvedic formulation triphala and its constituents. Int J Pharm 1997;35(5):313-7.
53. Prabhakar J, Senthilkumar M, Priya MS, Mahalakshmi K, Sehgal PK, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (triphala and green tea polyphenols), MTAD, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: An in vitro study. J Endod 2010;36(1):83‑6.
Statistics
329 Views | 1065 Downloads
How to Cite
S, P., and J. D. Raj. “EFFECT OF VARIOUS IRRIGANTS ON DENTAL BIOFILM: A REVIEW”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 8, no. 4, July 2015, pp. 13-16, https://innovareacademics.in/journals/index.php/ajpcr/article/view/6044.
Section
Review Article(s)