EVALUATING THE LEVELS OF OXIDATIVE DNA DAMAGE IN HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES IN RESPONSE TO CAFFEINE USING COMET ASSAY (SINGLE CELL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS)

  • Estabraq A. Al-wasiti
  • Sahar Abdal Whab Al-shaban
  • Anam R. I Al-salih
  • Hayder A. Al-aubaidy School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia

Abstract

Objectives: Caffeine asin (coffee, cola, and tea) is the most widely consumed beverages worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate the effects of caffeine in different concentrations on human cultured peripheral lymphocytes, in healthy individuals, using comet assay. The extent of DNA damage reflects a balance between oxidative stress (the presence of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 as a reactive oxygen species ROS), and DNA repair ability (the presence of anti-oxidant may be caffeine substances at known concentrations). This is an important method to prevent and avoid many cancerous diseases in an era of various pollutants.

Methods: Ten milliliters of venous blood samples were collected from 40 healthy young individuals, and lymphocyte cultures were set up after lymphocyte isolation with ficoll centrifugation. The mixture of lymphocytes culture media was incubated in the sterile incubator for 5 min after adding serial concentrations of caffeine (100, 500, 5000, 10000) µg/ml, as(group1,2,3,4 respectively) to 5% H2O2. The levels of oxidative DNA damage were expressed as comet tail length.

Results: At concentration 100 ug/ml, there was a significant elevation in the mean comet tail length level in cultured lymphocytes treated with hydrogen peroxide (106.96 µm) compared with the treated with All (mixture of caffeine, and H2O2), 6.670 µm.

Conclusion: We’ve concluded that a caffeine concentration of 100 µg/ml possesses the strongest anti-oxidant properties and causes much less DNA damage in lymphocytic culture when exposed to hydrogen peroxide.

Keywords: Oxidative DNA damage, Comet assay, Lymphocyte, Hydrogen peroxide

Keywords: Oxidative DNA damage, Comet assay, Lymphocyte, Hydrogen peroxide

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abel E, Hendris S, McNeeley S, Johnson K, Rosenberg C, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Vitolins M, Kruger M. Daily coffee consumption and prevalence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in white Caucasian women. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007;16:446–52.
2. Kerzendorfer C, O'Driscoll. UVB and caffeine: inhibiting the DNA damage response to protect against the adverse effects of UVB. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:1611–3.
3. Zampelas A, Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Stefanadis C. Associations between coffee consumption and inflammatory markers in healthy persons: the ATTICA study. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:862–7.
4. Snel J, Lorist MM. Effects of caffeine on sleep and cognition. Prog Brain Res 2011;190:105–17.
5. Stanner SA, Hughes J, Kelly CN, Buttriss J. A review of the epidemiological evidence for the antioxidant hypothesis public. Health Nute 2004;7:407–22.
6. Nandhakumar S, Parasuraman S, Shanmugam MM, Ramachandra Rao K, Chand P, Bhat BV. Evaluation of DNA damage using single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet Assay). J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2:107-11.
7. Maier BJ, Hofer E, Carin C, Lhoste E, Uhl M, Glatt HR, et al. Coffee diterpenes prevent the genotoxic effects of 2-amino-1-methyl–6-N–nitroso dimethylamine in human derived liver cell line (Hep G2). Food Chem Toxicol 2005;43:433-41.
8. Potter A, Kim C, Gallahon KA, Rabinovitch PS. Appoptotic human lymphocytes have diminished CD4 and CD8 receptor expression. Cell Immunol 1999;193:36-47.
9. O’Brien NM, Woods JA, Aherne SA, O'Callaghan YC. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative reactions in cell-culture models: modulatory effects of phytochemicals. Biochem Soc Trans 2000;28:22-6.
10. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983;65:55–63.
11. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Free radicals in biology and medicine. 4th Edition. Oxford University; Press, USA; 2007.
12. Stadler RH, Markoric J, Turesky RJ. In vitro anti–and pro-oxidative effects of natural polyphenols. Biol Trace Elem Res 1995;47:299-305.
13. Stadler RH, Turesky RJ, Müller O, Markovic J, Leong-Morgenthaler PM. The inhibitory effects of coffee on radical–mediated oxidation and mutagennicity. Mutat Res 1994; 308:177–90.
14. Bichler J, Cavin C, Simic T, Chakraborty A, Ferk F, Hoelzl C, et al. Coffee consumption protects human lymphocytes against oxidative and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole acetate (Trp-P-2) induced DNA-damage: results of an experimental study with human volunteers. Chem Toxicol 2007;45:1428-36.
15. Hoelzl C, Knasmüller S, Misík M, Collins A, Dusinská M, Nersesyan A. Use of single cell gel electrophoresis assays for the detection of DNA–protective effects of dietary factors in humans: Recent results and trends. Mutat Res 2009;681:68-79.
16. Merzenich UG, Zeitler H, Vetter H, Kraft K. Synergy research: Vitamins and secondary plant components in the maintenance of the redox homeostasis and cell signaling. Phytomedicine 2008;16:2-16.
17. SwaczynovaJ, Malikova J, Hoffmannova L, Kohout L, Strnad M. Anticancer properties of brassinosteroids. Phytochemistry 2008;69:418-26.
18. Esposito F, Morisco F, Verde V, Ritieni A, Alezio A, Caporaso N, et al. Moderate coffee consumption increases plasma glutathione but not homocysteine in healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:595–601.
19. Alidoost F, Gharagozloo M, Bagherpour B, Jafarian A, Sajjadi SE, Hourfar H, et al. Effects of silymarin on the proliferation and glutathione levels of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from beta-thalassemia major patients. Int Immunopharmacol 2006;6:1305–10.
20. Gülçin I. In vitro prooxidant effect of caffeine. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2008;23:149-52.
Statistics
155 Views | 620 Downloads
How to Cite
Al-wasiti, E. A., S. A. W. Al-shaban, A. R. I. Al-salih, and H. A. Al-aubaidy. “EVALUATING THE LEVELS OF OXIDATIVE DNA DAMAGE IN HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES IN RESPONSE TO CAFFEINE USING COMET ASSAY (SINGLE CELL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS)”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 8, no. 6, Apr. 2016, pp. 137-41, https://innovareacademics.in/journals/index.php/ijpps/article/view/11162.
Section
Original Article(s)