IN VITRO ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS POTENCIES OF HOMEOPATHIC DRUG THUJA AGAINST MOLDS INVOLVED IN MYCOTIC KERATITIS
Objective: Isolation and characterisation of clinically isolated fungi from mycotic keratitis and exploration of the in vitro efficacy of various potencies of homeopathic preparations of Thuja occidentalis on the ocular fungal isolates.
Methods: Clinical samples were collected from fungal keratitis patients attending a tertiary eye care hospital in Coimbatore, Tamilnadu state, India. The scrapings were also subjected to Gram staining and 10% KOH mount to detect the presence of fungal hyphae. The fungal isolates were subjected to lacto phenol cotton blue (LCB) mount employing cello tape flag method. Homeopathic drug Thuja occidentalis with various potencies viz., Q, 30 C, 200 C, 1 M, 10 M and 50 M were investigated for the growth inhibition of various fungal isolates by plate assay method. Further, a follow up analyses with varying dilutions of Q and 10 M homeopathic potencies of Thuja was carried out for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration of both microdilution and minimum fungicidal concentration for the Biopolaris isolates.
Results: Out of 35 samples analysed, Fusarium spp. (n=5), Aspergillus flavus (n=6), Bipolaris spp. (n=3), Exserohilum spp. (n=3) and Curvularia spp (n=3) were identified. All the potencies of Thuja had good inhibitory activity against Bipolaris spp., followed by Curvularia spp., Exserohilum spp. and Aspergillus flavus. Statistical analysis revealed significant inhibition of all the test isolates by Thuja Q and 50 M. Significant growth inhibition was exhibited by Thuja 30, 200 C, I M for Bipolaris, Exserohilum & A. flavus isolate and Thuja 10 M for all the isolates tested except Fusaria. It was revealed that for the Biopolaris isolates BS1, BS2, BS3 Thuja 10 M and Thuja Q had MIC and MFC of 0.125/10[20,00]0& 0.0625/10 and 0.25/100 & 0.125/10, respectively.
Conclusion: The present investigation concludes that homeopathic drug Thuja has good inhibitory activity against the fungi causing keratitis, irrespective of the potencies. It is evident that no definite co-relation exists between various potencies of the same homeopathic drug with regard to their antimycotic properties.
2. Nayak N. Fungal infections of the eye-laboratory diagnosis and treatment. Nepal Med Coll J 2008;10(1):48-63.
3. Leck AK, Thomas PA, Hagan M, Kaliamurthy J, Ackuaku E, John M. Etiology of suppurative corneal ulcers in Ghana and South India, and epidemiology of fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1211â€“5.
4. Wilson LA, Aejelloo L. Agents of oculomycosis: Fungal infections of the eye. In: Collier L, Balows A, Sussman A, editors. Topely and Wilsonâ€™s Microbiology and Microbial Infections, 9th ed, Arnold: London; 1998. p. 525-67.
5. Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C, Cevallos V, Mascarenhas JM, Asokan B, et al. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, South India. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:965â€“71.
6. Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Vasu S, Meenakshi R, Palaniappan R. Aetiological diagnosis of microbial keratitis in South India-A study of 1618 cases. Indian J Med Microbiol 2002;20:19-24.
7. Tilak R, Singh A, Maurya OPS, Chandra A, Tilak V, Gulati AK. Mycotic keratitis in India: a five-year retrospective study. J Infect Dev Ctries 2010;4(3):171-4.
8. Gupta G. In vitro antimycotic potential of Thuja occidentalis against Curvulara lunata causing Phaeoyphomycosis in Human. Natl J Homoeopathy 2002;4(3):5-12.
9. Jacob P, Gopinathan U, Sharma S, Rao GN. Calcium alginate swab versus Bard Parker blade in the diagnosis of microbial keratiits. Cornea 1995;14(4):360-4.
10. Laila A, Salam MA, Hasan B, Begum N, Ahmed I. Etiological agents of suppurative corneal ulcer: Study of 56 cases. Bangladesh J Med Microbiol 2009;3 (1):33-6.
11. Harris JL. Safe, low-distortion type touch method for fungal slide mounts. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38(12):4683-4.
12. Larone DH. Medically Important Fungi-A Guide to Identification, 3rd ed. ASM Press: Washington DC; 1995.
13. Leslie JF, Summerell BA, Bullock S. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Publishers: Ames, Iowa, USA; 2006.
14. CLSI Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; proposed guideline. CLSI document M38-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne; 2008.
15. Jones BR. Principles in the management of oculomycosis. Edward jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;79:719â€“51.
16. Liesegang TJ, Forster RK. Spectrum of microbial keratitis in south Florida. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;90:38â€“47.
17. Rosa RH, Jr Miller D, Alfonso EC. The changing spectrum of fungal keratitis in south florida. Ophthalmol 1994;101:1005â€“13.
18. Upadhyay MP, Karmacharya PCD, Koirala S, Tuladhar NK, Bryan le, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics, predisposing factors and etiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:92-9.
19. Katz NN, Wadud SA, Ayazuddin M. Corneal ulcer disease in Bangladesh. Ann Ophthalmol 1983;15:834â€“6.
20. Dunlop AA, Wright ED, Howlader SA, Nazrul I, Husain R, McClellan K, et al. Suppurative corneal ulceration in Bangladesh. A study of 142 cases examining the microbiological diagnosis, clinical and epidemiological features of bacterial and fungal keratitis. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1994;22:105-10.
21. Polack FM, Kaufman HE, Newmark E. Keratomycosis medical and surgical treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;85:410â€“6.
22. Thomas PA. Mycotic keratitis: an underestimated mycosis. J Med Vet Mycol 1994;32:235â€“54.
23. Sirukul T, Prabriputaloong T, Sathivat A, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Predisposing factors and etiologic diagnosis of ulcerative keratitis. Cornea 2008;27(3):283-7.
24. Norina TJ, Raihan S, Bakiah S, Ezanee M, Liza-Sharmini AT, Wan Hazzabah WH. Microbial keratitis: aetiological diagonosis and clinical features in patients admitted to hospital University Sains Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2008;49(1): 67-71.
25. Gopinathan U, Garg P, Fernandes M, Sharma S, Athmanathan S, Rao GN. The epidemiological features and Laboratory results of fungal keratitis: a 10-year review at a referral eye care centre in South India. Cornea 1994;21:555-9.
26. Hagan M, Wright E, Newman M, Dolin P, Johnson G. Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:1024â€“8.
27. Clausen J, van Wijk R, Henning A. Review of the use of high dilutions in basic research on homeopathy. Homeopathy 2011;100(4):288-92.
28. Garg KL. Use of homoeopathic drugs as antifungal agent for the protection of books and paper materials. In: Aranyanak C and Singhasiri C, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International conference on Biodeterioration of Cultural Property held at Bangkok, Thailand. Conservation Science Division, The Fine Arts Department, Bangkok, Thailand; 1995. p. 103-15.
29. Dua VK, Atri DC. Control of tomato fruit rot caused by Alternaria Solani with Homeopathy drugs. J Bot Soc 2004;39:88-93.
30. Hussain SZ, Anandam RJ, Rao AS. Effect of different fungicides and homeopathic drugs on seedborne fungi of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Indian J Plant Prot 2000;28(2):148-51.
31. Khanna KK, Chandra S. Effect of homeopathic drugs on respiration of germinating fungal spores. Indian Phytopathol 1992;45:348-53.
32. Gupta S, Kiran K, Dutta A. Biocontrol of clinical fungal isolates associated with fungal keratitis using medicinal plant extract. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2012;4(4):544-7.
33. Jahan N, Ahmad M, Mehjabeen M, Zia-ul-haq S, Alam L, Quereshi M. Antimicrobial screening of some medicinal plants of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 2010;42(6):4281-4.
34. Gupta G, Srivastava AK, In vitro activity of Thuja occidentalis Linn. against human pathogenic aspergilla. Homoeopathic Heritage 2002;27(1):5-12.
35. Srivastava AK, Lal B. Studies on biofungicidal properties of leaf extract of some plants: Indian Phyto; 1996;50(3):408-11.