Evaluation of the Indian Top 10 Pharma Education Institutions Research Output Listed by National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) 2020: A Scientometric Study
The Higher Education System Rankings measure national higher education systems and meet a long-standing need to shift the discussion from the ranking of the NIRF top institutions to the best overall systems in each country, in order to reflect the country’s overall performance in NIRF rankings we propose a new Excellence/Quality indicator based on the excellence level reached by their Top Pharma education institutions within the Top positions of the NIRF weighted by the country’s size population. In the present study, we analysed the Top 10 Pharma education institutions of the NIRF Ranking 2020. The first rank positioned by Hamdard University NIRF score of (80.5). SCOPUS database was used to extract the data and the study limited to five years (2016-2019) which resulted in 7172 documents. The data analysis was performed using Biblioshiny, Microsoft excel, and VOS Viewer software, further data were explored using bibliometrics tools and techniques. The study attempt to measure the top 10 Pharma Education Institution’s and their publications, Year-Wise distribution of research Output, document type, Highly Prolific Authors, Most Preferred Sources, Funding Agencies, Most Cited Papers, Most Productive and Most Cited Countries, and Highly Prolific Keywords based on the collected data. The analysis of the study indicates the highest publications with 2129, published by Institute of Chemical Technology-Mumbai; the most the productive year 2017 with 1508 publications; most of the publications are published as articles (6067); highly prolific author Sekar N with 194 papers, total citation 1954, h-index 22; preferred source title RSC Advance, 217 paper, total citation 2508, h-index 24; top funding agency University Grant Commission (UGC) 609 papers; top cited paper Shao Y, 2015, Molecular Physics; most productive and most cited country the USA.
2. Sangam SL, Bagalkoti VT. Rankings of Indian Universities: A Scientometrics Analysis. Proc 10th Int CALIBER 2015. 2015;(March):182–91.
3. Prathap G. The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr Sci. 2014;107(3):389–96.
4. N.K S, Mathew K S, Cherukodan S. Impact of scholarly output on university ranking. Glob Knowledge, Mem Commun. 2018;67(3):154–65.
5. Kumar A, Tiwari S, Chauhan AK, Ahirwar R. Impact of NIRF on research publications: A study on top 20 (ranked) Indian Universities. COLLNET J Sci Inf Manag. 2019;
6. Marisha, Banshal SK, Singh VK. Research performance of central universities in India. Curr Sci. 2017;112(11):2198–207.
7. Mukherjee B. Ranking Indian Universities Through Research and Professional Practices of National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF): A Case Study of Select Central Universities in India. J Indian Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2016;52(4):93–107. Available from: https://www.ilaindia.net/jila/index.php/jila/article/view/87
8. Gourikeremath G, Hiremath RS. A Comparative Study of University of Mysore and Karnatak University in Science?: Research Output and Citation Impact During 2002-16. 2020;56(2):75–83.
9. Kappi M, Dr. Chaman Sab M MB, Bagalkoti DVT. Research Productivity of NIRF 2020 Top Indian Law Institutions. In: Rai DP, Singh DA, Arjun D, Prasad S, Bansal DV, editors. Changing Dimensions of Education and Librarianship during COVID-19 [Internet]. Bhagalpur: AKB Publication; 2020. p. 48–68. Available from: akbpublication.com
10. Pradhan, B., & Ramesh, D. B. 2018. Scientometric analysis of research publications of six Indian Institutes of Technology. 2018;65(March):50–6.
11. Das TK. Bibliometric analysis of research publications of IITs: A study based on Scopus. J Acad Librariansh. 2019;20(3):105–23.
12. Kumar, Satish & Senthilkumar R. Scientometric mapping of research output of NIRF first ranked institute of India?: IISc , Bangalore. 2019;
13. Pal JK, Sarkar S. Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity. 2020;40(1):406–17.
14. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr [Internet]. 2017;11(4):959–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
15. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.
16. Lawani S.M. Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study. [Internet]. Florida State University; 1980 [cited 2021 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=7306719
17. Kappi M, Balabhim Sankrappa Biradar, Chaman Sab M. Measuring and assessing research productivity of Physics Scientist Dr R. G. Sonkawade. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2020;(December). Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4621
18. Subramanyam K. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. J Inf Sci [Internet]. 1983;6(1):33–8. Available from: 10.1177/016555158300600105
19. Ajiferuke I, Burell Q, Tague J. Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics [Internet]. 1988 Nov [cited 2021 Mar 1];14(5–6):421–33. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02017100
20. Savanur K, Srikanth R. Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):365–71.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.