FORMATIVE ELECTRONIC ASSESSMENTS DURING COVID-19 LOCKDOWN IN SECOND PHASE MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES

Authors

  • DHANYA SASIDHARAN PALAPPALLIL Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
  • DEEPA SUJATHA Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2021.v14i7.41430

Keywords:

Formative, Electronic, Assessment, Google form, Kahoot, Feedback, COVID-19

Abstract

Objective: Electronic learning and assessment was embraced in medical education worldwide following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was done to determine the perceptions of medical undergraduates on formative electronic assessments conducted during COVID-19 lockdown and to estimate the mean marks scored in these assessments.

Methods: This was a descriptive study done for a period of 3 months on online platform. Six online formative assessments were conducted on Google Forms or Kahoot. A questionnaire was administered as Google Form to collect the perceptions of the participants on perceived ease of use of platform, attitude, and practice adopted in online assessments. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.

Results: The response rate was 97.7%. Kahoot was perceived to be easier with lesser technical glitches and privacy concerns as compared to Google, while it was equivocal in terms of access assessment links, output storage, display clarity, overall user interface, network issues, need for computer literacy, and eyestrain caused. The participants had a positive attitude regarding the usefulness of online assessments however majority liked the traditional assessments more than the online assessments. While less than one-third (22%) had copy pasted some answers, more than half (54.4%) had referred to internet and more than three quarter (79.6%) had referred to textbooks/power points/notes while attending online assessments.

Conclusion: The participants felt that Google Forms and Kahoot were comparable online assessment tools except for difficulty in filling, privacy concerns, and technical issues on Google Forms. The usefulness of online assessments was embraced by the participants but they felt that the traditional assessments were to be continued, while attending online assessments some students had referred to the internet or study materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

DEEPA SUJATHA, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

Assistant Professor

Pathology

GMC Kottayam

References

Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Effective Practice with E-Assessment; 2007. Available from: https://www.issuu.com/ jiscinfonet/docs/effective_practice_with_e-assessment_2007. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Alruwais N, Wills G, Wald M. Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. Int J Inform Educ Technol 2018;8:34-7.

Al-Amri S, Ali Z. Systematic review of computer based assessments in medical education. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2016;4:79-88.

Tapper J, Batty D, Savage M. Medical Students Take Final Exams Online for First Time, Despite Student Concern, The Guardian; 2020. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/mar/22/ coronavirus-forces-medical-students-sit-final-exams-online. [Last accessed on 2021 Jan 06].

Google Forms; 2021. Available from: https://www.en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/google_forms. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Kahoot! 2021. Available from: https://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ kahoot!. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Chanpet P, Chomsuwan K, Murphy E. Online project-based learning and formative assessment. Technol Knowl Learn 2018;25:685-705.

Kumar LR, Bedra A, Karkera R. Perception of medical students on E-assessment conducted through Yengage portal. Arch Med Health Sci 2013;1:61-6.

Elzainy A, Sadik AE, Abdulmonem WA. Experience of e learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the College of Medicine, Qassim University. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2020;15:456-62.

Norcini JJ, McKinley DW. Assessment methods in medical education. Teach Teach Educ 2007;23:239-50.

Ward JP, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehmann HP. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet 2001;357:792-6.

Thelwall M. Computerbased assessment: A versatile educational tool.Comput Educ 2000;34:37-49.

Cantillon P, Irish B, Sales D. Using computers for assessment in medicine. BMJ 2004;329:606-9.

Sheader E, Gouldsborough I, Grady R. Staff and student perceptions of computer-assisted assessment for physiology practical classes. Adv Physiol Educ 2006;30:174-80.

Zakrzewski S, Bull J. The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assess Eval High Educ 1998;23:141-52.

Thompson S, Thurlow M, Moore M. Using Computer-Based Tests with Students with Disabilities (Policy Directions No. 15). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes; 2002. Available from: http://www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ed475318.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Lee G, Weerakoon P. The role of computer-aided assessment in health professional education: A comparison of student performance in computer-based and paper and-pen-multiple-choice tests. Med Teach 2001;23:152-7.

Hassanien MA, AL-Hayani A, Abu-Kamer R, Almazrooa A. A six step approach for developing compute based assessment in medical education. Med Teach 2013;35 Suppl 1:S15-9.

Deutsch T, Herrmann K, Frese T, Sandholzer H. Implementing computer-based assessment-a web-based mock examination changes attitudes. Comput Educ 2012;58:1068-75.

Bandele SO, Oluwayato JA, Omodara MF. Opinions of undergraduates on the use of electronic examination in a Nigerian university. Mediterr J Soc Sci 2015;6:75-81.

Jawaid M, Moosa FA, Jaleel F. Computer based assessment (CBA): Perception of residents at Dow university of health sciences. Pak J Med Sci 2016;30:688-91.

Kuhbeck F, Berberat PO, Engelhardt S, Sarikas A. Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:412.

Gamage KA, de Silva EK, Gunawardhana N. Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Educ Sci 2020;10:301.

Internationnal Centre for Academic Integrity, Fundamental Values Project 2014; 2021. Available from: https://www.academicintegrity. org/fundamental-values. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Canturbury Christ Church University. Available from: https://www. canterbury.ac.uk/current-students/academic-services/assessments/ exams-and-coursework. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Birch E, de Wolf M. A novel approach to medical school examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Educ Online 2020;25:1785680.

National Medical Commission. Module on Online Learning and Assessment. New Delhi: National Medical Commission; 2020. p. 1-57. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/mcirest/open/ getdocument?path=/documents/public/portal/latestnews/module-8- online-learning-and-assessment-17-11-20-version-final-for-uploading-converted.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 13].

Sreedharan S, Palappallil DS, Veedu LK, Sankar HK, Divakaran AM. Assimilating and reproducing concepts after pharmacology lecture-a questionnaire-based study. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2020;13:122-5.

Kesavan KP, Palappallil DS. Effectiveness of formative assessment in motivating and improving the outcome of summative assessment in pharmacology for medical undergraduates. J Clin Diagn Res 2018;12:FC08-11.

Published

09-06-2021

How to Cite

PALAPPALLIL, D. S., and D. SUJATHA. “FORMATIVE ELECTRONIC ASSESSMENTS DURING COVID-19 LOCKDOWN IN SECOND PHASE MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 14, no. 7, June 2021, pp. 141-5, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2021.v14i7.41430.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)