IMPACT OF NEUROCOGNITION ON TEACHING COMPETENCY
Teachers' can facilitate a life time of successful learning by equipping students with a repertoire of strategies and tools for learning. The teacher plays an important role in the educational process. Effective teaching depends upon the evolution of innovative strategies and also the methodology of teaching. As we gain a more scientifically based understanding about today's novel brain and how it learns, we must rethink about what we do in classroom and school. Neuro scientists are mapping the pathways between body and brain, providing tangible evidence of the benefits of hands-on, experimental learning. Neurocognitive process includes a number of human functions through neuronal networks. Brain cells communicating with each other through on electrochemical process. Neurocognition includes perceiving, recognizing, conceiving, judging and reasoning processes. The neurocognitive approach is based upon certain irrefutable facts concerning brain functions, which are applied to the intervention strategies of student teachers developmental difficulties. The teachers must develop the competencies like content competency, contextual competency, communication competency, classroom management and evaluation competency. In this paper, we discuss how the brain and its functions are helpful to the teachers in teaching and bringing out the dimensions of teaching competency such as induction, content, pedagogy, organisation and assessment. We elucidate the Neurocognitive strategies are how helpful to bring out the secrets of amygdala and hippocampus involving in teaching strategies. We also emphasize that the recent development of designing Neurocognitive programme that focus on both cognitive and social development has theoretical and practical challenges.
2. Stephen M. Stahl(2006), Structure and Function of Neurons. Neuroscientific Basis and Practical Applications, Cambridge University Press
3. Dolors Girbau(2007), Neurocognitive Approach to the Study of Private Speech. The Spanish Journal of Psychology ,Vol. 10, No. 1, 41-51
4. Michael j.(2008), A neurocognitive model of borderline personality disorder: Effects of childhood sexual abuse and relationship to adult social attachment disturbance. Development and Psychopathology, Cambridge University Press, 341â€“368
5. J. S. Brekke etal (2009) Neurocognitive change, functional change and service intensity during community-based psychosocial rehabilitation. Psychological Medicine, Cambridge University Press, 39, 1637â€“1647
6. Michel Thiebaut de Schotten and Paolo Bartolomeo (2010),New insights into neurocognition provided by brain mapping: visuospatial cognition. M. Thiebaut de Schotten and P. Bartolomeo
7. Thomas Schack et al(2010),Progress in Neurocognition, Action and Biomechanics. Neurocognition and Action â€“ Research Group
8. Michael Posner (2012),Cognitive neuroscience- development and prospects, Current Trends In Science
9. Adrienne kozan naume (2008), Science teacher competencies in a knowledged Based society.
10. Ankara (2006), Generic teacher competencies. Support to basic education project teacher training componentâ€
11. Sutopo (2010). Indonesian science teachers Competencies. Sutopo, Phys.Dept. SUM
12. Nicole Fiori (2010) Cognitive Neuroscience ISBN 978-81-203-4037-4, PHI Learning Private limited, New Delhi-110001
13. Douglas J.Hacker (2001) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice ISBN 0-8058-2481-2, Lawrence Erlabaum Associates, Publishers, New Jersey,London.
14. John j.Ratey M.D (2008) A Users Guide to the Brain, Vintage books, NewYork.
15. ParimalaFathima.M. (2009) Neurocogniion and learning, Today Publication Pvt.Ltd Chennai