Effects of Computer-Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Test (PPT) on Academic Achievement and Test Anxiety of Secondary School Students in Economics

Authors

  • C. C. Abanobi Department of Educational Psychology Federal College of Education (Technical), Asaba
  • Ngozi N. Agu Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Lydia I. Eleje Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-289X
  • Ifeoma C. Metu Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-2853
  • Njideka G. Mbelede Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-0440
  • Nneka C. Ezeugo Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i1.45960

Keywords:

computer-based test, paper and pencil test, academic achievement, test anxiety, economics

Abstract

Investigated in this study are the effects of Computer Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) on Secondary School (SS) students’ academic achievement and test anxiety in Economics. The pretest-posttest non-randomized control group design was used as the research design. The study was done in Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria. All SS II students who offered Economics comprised the study’s population. 107 SS II students were selected as the sample. Two instruments - Economics Achievement Test (EAT) and Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) were used for data collection. Both EAT and TAI was validated by the experts. The reliability coefficients of the instruments were .95 and .68, respectively. The data collected were analyzed using mean statistics to answer two research questions, whereas two formulated null hypotheses were tested at a .05 level of significance using ANCOVA. The findings of the study indicated that students’ mean achievement scores in PPT were slightly higher than students’ mean achievement scores in CBT and the students’ mean achievement scores were significantly different. Students in PPT exhibited greater test anxiety than their counterparts in CBT, even though the difference in the mean test anxiety scores of students in CBT and PPT was not significant. Based on the findings, the study recommended, among others, that the Federal Government should make and implement policies to mandate SSs to use PPT for all internal assessments in various subjects in the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abanobi, C. C. (2013). Psychometric properties of NABTEB economics multiple-choice test items from 2005 to 2011[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.

Abanobi, C. C. (2022). Comparative analysis of academic achievement scores of secondary school students exposed to Computer-Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pen Test (PPT) in Economics in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 16(1), 11-21.

Akinleke, W. O., & Adeaga, T. M. (2014). Contributions of test anxiety, study habits and locus of control to academic performance. British Journal of Psychology Research, 2(1), 14-24.

Akman-Yesilel, D. B. (2012). Test anxiety in ELT classes. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3, 24-31.

Alabi, A.T., Issa, A. O., & Oyekunle, R. A. (2012). The use of computer-based testing methods for the conduct of examinations at the University of Ilorin. Ife Journal of Educational Leadership, Administration and Planning (IJELAP), 1(1), 226.

Alakyleh, A. S. (2018). Evaluating the Comparability of PPT and CBT by Implementing the Compulsory Islamic Culture Course Test in Jordan University. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(1), 176-186.

Al-amri, S. S. (2009). Computer-based testing vs. paper-based testing: Establishing the comparability of reading tests through the evolution of a new comparability model in a Saudi EFL context [Doctoral thesis, The University of Essex, UK]. British Library. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.496244

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Technology in testing: The present and the future. System, 28(4), 593-603.

Alisa, E. S. (2014). The impact of assessment delivery method on student achievement in language arts [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Department and Faculty of the School of Education of Baker University.

Augustine, S. A. (2010). Teaching of economics in the Nigerian secondary school system: Problem and prospects. Journal of Educational Studies, 15(1), 27-33.

Augustine, S. A. (2013). Attitude to the teaching of economics subject in secondary school. Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 204-213.

Cassady, J. C., & Gridley, B. (2005). The effects of online formative and summative assessment on test anxiety and performance. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(1), 1-30.

Choi, I., Kim, K., & Boo, J. (2003). Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test. Language Testing, 20(3), 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt258o

Cizek, G. J., & Burg, S. S. (2006). Addressing test anxiety in a high-stakes environment: Strategies for classrooms and schools. Corwin.

Clariana, R., & Wallance, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00294

Columbus, A. M. (2008). Advances in psychology research. Nova Science Publishers.

Dangut, A. J., & Sakiyo, J. (2014). Assessment of computer literacy skills and computer-based testing anxiety of secondary school students in Adamawa and Taraba states, Nigeria.

Dermo, J., & Eyre, S. (2008). Secure, reliable and effective institution-wide e-assessment: Paving the ways for new technologies. In F. Khandia (Ed.), Proceedings of 12th International CAA Conference, (pp. 95–106). Loughborough: University of Loughborough.

Eleje, L. I., Esomonu, N. P. M., & Ufearo, F. N. (2019). Trends in information and communication technology and learning assessment: The application and implication. International Educational Applied Research Journal, 3(11), 1-6.

Eleje, L. I., Esomonu, N. P. M., Okoye, R. O., Agu, N. N., Ugorji, C. O., Okoi, O. A., & Abanobi, C. C. (2020). Students’ academic achievement in secondary-school quantitative economics: Effect of feedback with remediation. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(4), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.03.04.155

Esomonu, N. P. M., & Eleje, L. I. (2017). Diagnostic quantitative economics skill test for Secondary Schools: Development and validation using item response theory. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(22), 110-125.

George, Y. (2011). Students’ perception of computer-based assessment in the university of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.

Gwen, G. (2013). Does the use of computer-based assessments produce less text anxiety symptoms than traditional paper and pencil assessments? [Unpublished master’s thesis] Faculty of the College of Education, Ohio University.

Harris, H. L., & Coy, D. R. (2003). Helping students cope with test anxiety. ERIC digest (ED479355). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED479355.pdf

Huberty, T. J. (2009). Test and performance anxiety. Principal Leadership, 10(1), 12-16.

Jaiyeoba, A. O., & Atanda, A. I. (2011). School quality factors and secondary school students’ achievement in mathematics in south-western and north-central Nigeria. The African Symposium, 11(1).

Lim, E. C., Ong, B. K., Wilder-Smith, E. P., & Seet, R. C. (2006). Computer-based versus pen-and-paper testing: students’ perception. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 35(9), 599–603.

Mehmood, T., Hussain, T., Khalid, M., & Azam, R. (2012). Impact of formative assessment on academic achievement of secondary school students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(17). 101-104.

Ndupuechi, T. I. (2009). Improving the teaching of economics in Nigerian school. Jos Educational Forum, 4(1), 91-97.

Oduntan, O. E., Ojuawo, O. O., & Oduntan, E. A. (2015). A comparative analysis of student performance in paper pencil test (PPT) and computer based test (CBT) examination system. Research Journal of Educational Studies and Review, 1(1), 24-29.

Ofqual, E. H. (2020). A review of the literature concerning anxiety for educational assessments. Ofqual. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/865832/A_review_of_the_literature_concerning_anxiety_for_educational_assessment.pdf

Oladimeji, B. Y. (2005). Psychological assessment techniques in health care. Obafemi Awolowo University Press Ltd.

Osadebe, P. U. (2014). Construction of economics achievement test for assessment of students. World Journal of Education, 4(2), 58-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n2p58

Owolabi, J., & Dahunsi O. R. (2014). A study of the interaction between computer-related factors and anxiety in a computerized testing situation (A case study of national open university, Nigeria). International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE), 3(1), 43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2014.3103

Revuelta, J., Ximénez, M. C., & Olea, J. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251282

Sanni, A. A., & Mohammad, M. F. (2015). Computer-based testing (CBT): An assessment of student perception of Jamb Utme in Nigeria. Computing, Information Systems, Development Informatics & Allied Research Journal, 6(2), 14-28.

Scheuermann, F., & Bjornsson, J. (Eds.). (2009). The transition to computer-based assessment: New approaches to skills assessment and implications for large-scale testing. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Schult, C. A., & McIntosh, J. L. (2004). Employing computer-administered exams in general psychology: Student anxiety and expectations. Teaching of Psychology, 31(3), 209-211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3103_7

Segool, N. (2009). Test anxiety associated with high-stakes testing among elementary school children: Prevalence, predictors, and relationship to student performance. ProQuest, LLC.

Sheu, L. A., & Evanero, V. O. (2022). Comparability of computer based and paper & pencil test on students’ performance in educational assessment course at the Federal University Gusau, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas, 3(2), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.47434/JEREDA.3.2.2022.114

Sorana-Daniela, B., & Lorentz, J. (2007). Computer-based testing on physical chemistry topic: A case study. International Journal of Education & Development using Information and Communication Technology. 3(1), 94-95.

Stowell, J. R., & Bennett, D. (2010). Effects of online testing on student exam performance and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.2.b

Published

18-11-2022

How to Cite

Abanobi, C. C., Agu, N. N. ., Eleje, L. I., Metu, I. C., Mbelede, N. G., & Ezeugo, N. C. (2022). Effects of Computer-Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Test (PPT) on Academic Achievement and Test Anxiety of Secondary School Students in Economics. Innovare Journal of Education, 11(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i1.45960

Issue

Section

Research Article(s)