A Systematic Review of Online Peer Assessment Tools for Learning Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2025v13i2.53640Keywords:
feedback tools, learning evaluation, online peer assessment, outcomes, peer feedbackAbstract
Online peer assessment is a process that uses digital platforms or tools for students to evaluate and provide feedback on their peers’ work. This method aligns with Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory by promoting social interaction, collaborative learning, and the use of technological tools. The purpose of this study was to review the tools used and the lessons learned from online peer assessment (OPA). The literature review identified eight tools that facilitate OPA: (1) Peer Grade (2) Turnitin Peer Mark (3) Eli Review (4) Google Classroom (5) Moodle Workshop (6) Peerceptiv (7) Online Quizzes or Interactive Exercises (8) e-Portfolio. The results show that OPA enhances learning awareness, critical thinking, and metacognitive facilitation and promotes self-regulated learning, inter-professional teamwork, collaboration skills, evaluation skills, diversification feedback, enriches accountability, and actively engages learners. Therefore, it is essential to explore and select a tool that best meets specific needs and requirements, which may necessitate future research.
Downloads
References
Adesina, O. O., Adesina, O. A., Adelopo, I., & Afrifa, G. A. (2023). Managing group work: The impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Accounting Education, 32(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2034023
Amendola, D., & Miceli, C. (2018). Online peer assessment to improve Students’learning outcomes and soft skills. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 71–84.
Ardiningtyas, S. Y., Butarbutar, R., Weda, S., & Nur, S. (2023). Online scaffolding behavior for speaking EFL improvement: Narrative inquiry issues. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5009–5019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207608
Awada, G. M., & Diab, N. M. (2023). Effect of online peer review versus face-to-face peer review on argumentative writing achievement of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1912104
Babakr, Z. H., Mohamedamin, P., & Kakamad, K. (2019). Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: Critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84
Black, E. W., Dickson, T., & Blue, A. V. (2021). Exploring item discrimination in an online self and peer assessment of interprofessional teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, 22, Article 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100396
Bong, J., & Park, M. S. (2020). Peer assessment of contributions and learning processes in group projects: An analysis of information technology undergraduate students’ performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1727413
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Butarbutar, R. (2021). Learner’s perception of task difficulties in technology-mediated task-based language teaching. Englisia, 9(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10079
Butarbutar, R., Ruing, F. H., Basri, N., Tuharea, V. U., & Radja Leba, S. M. (2023a). Unpacking online collaborative learning in teaching EFL speaking: Insights from three rural area case studies. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6165
Butarbutar, R., Uspayanti, R., Manuhutu, N., & Palangngan, S. T. (2019, August 3-4). Analyzing of puzzle local culture-based in teaching English for young learners. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012208
Butarbutar, R., Weda, S., & Nur, S. (2023b). Guided-blended collaborative learning in speaking class: Voices of non-native English teachers and students from eastern Indonesia. American Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.55284/ajel.v8i1.890
Cheng, K.-H., Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2014). Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.649766
Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2013). Peer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1524
Cleland, J., & Walton, G. (2012). Online peer assessment: Helping to facilitate learning through participation. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i4.124
Costello, J., & Crane, D. (2013). Technologies for learner-centered feedback. Open Praxis, 5(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.3.63
Day, N. Z., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Online peer feedback on video presentations: Type of feedback and improvement of presentation skills. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1904826
Dingel, M., & Wei, W. (2014). Influences on peer evaluation in a group project: An exploration of leadership, demographics and course performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.867477
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage Publications.
Hasyim, N., Arismunandar, R., Butarbutar, R., Ramli, A. M., & Malik Nur, I. D. (2024). Mind mapping of teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning: A reflective study of urban and suburban areas. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2292864
Hilal, T. A., Hilal, A. A., & Hilal, H. A. (2022). Social networking applications: A comparative analysis for a collaborative learning through google classroom and zoom. Procedia Computer Science, 210, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.120
Hou, H.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701206974
Hsu, P. L., & Huang, K. H. (2015, September 1–3). Evaluating online peer assessment as an educational tool for promoting self-regulated learning. In Multidisciplinary social networks research. Proceedings of the 2: Second International Conference, MISNC 2015, Matsuyama, Japan (pp. 161–173). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Huang, W., London, J. S., & Perry, L. A. (2022). Project-Based learning promotes students’ perceived relevance in an engineering statistics course: A comparison of learning in synchronous and online learning environments. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2022.2128119
Hughes, M., Ventura, S., & Dando, M. (2004). On-line interprofessional learning: Introducing constructivism through enquiry-based learning and peer review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820410001731304
Jiang, J.-P., Hu, J.-Y., Zhang, Y.-B., & Yin, X.-C. (2022). Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6480–6496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039949
Jung, Y., Kim, M.-S., & Yu, K. A. (2022). Assessing contributions in team-based learning in a class of general education: Focusing on self-evaluation and peer review. The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence, 44(10), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2022.10.44.10.237
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., Van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 763–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8
Kim, H. S. (2014). Uncertainty analysis for peer assessment: Oral presentation skills for final year project. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.833171
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
Krusche, S., & Seitz, A. (2019). Increasing the Interactivity in Software Engineering MOOCs – A Case Study. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 7592-7601). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.915
Laflen, A. (2020). Using Eli review as a strategy for feedback in online courses. Assessing Writing, 46, Article 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100486
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021). Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13054
Lerchenfeldt, S., & Taylor, T. A. H. (2020). Best practices in peer assessment: Training tomorrow’s physicians to obtain and provide quality feedback. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, 571–578. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S250761
Li, A. W. (2023). Using Peerceptiv to support AI-based online writing assessment across the disciplines. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100746
Li, M., & Li, J. (2017). Online Peer Review Using Turnitin in First-Year Writing Classes. Computers and Composition, 46, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.001
Lin, J.-W., Tsai, C.-W., Hsu, C.-C., & Chang, L.-C. (2021). Peer assessment with group awareness tools and effects on project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1593198
Liu, C.-C., & Tsai, C.-M. (2005). Peer assessment through web‐based knowledge acquisition: Tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500048838
Liu, J., Guo, X., Gao, R., Fram, P., Ling, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Students’ learning outcomes and peer rating accuracy in compulsory and voluntary online peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1542659
Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018
Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(1), 1–27.
Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2).
McLuckie, J., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Transferable skills for online peer learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930410001689144
McMahon, M., & Oliver, R. (2001). Promoting self-regulated learning in an on-line environment (pp. 1299–1305). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students’ writing. Computers and Composition, 54, Article 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524
Nikolic, S., Stirling, D., & Ros, M. (2018). Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using YouTube: Self- and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569
Nur, S., Butarbutar, R., Ardiningtyas, S. Y., & Alimuddin, A. H. (2022). A systematic review on integrating MALL in English language teaching. ELT Worldwide, 9(1), 56–69.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Callaghan, A. (2004). Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self-assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290410001733294
Palacios, N., Rafique, R., Kwihangana, F., & Zhao, X. (2022). Online peer-led group reflective practice in higher education: A seminar-based project evaluation. Reflective Practice, 23(6), 676–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2116567
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2018). Accountability in peer assessment: Examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374
Rosa, S. S., Coutinho, C. P., & Flores, M. A. (2016). Online peer assessment: Method and digital technologies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 418–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.064
Sekendiz, B. (2018). Utilisation of formative peer-assessment in distance online education: A case study of a multi-model sport management unit. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1396229
Shen, J. (2005). Collaborative examinations in asynchronous learning networks: Field Experiments on collaborative learning through online assessments. New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Shortridge, A., Steinheider, B., Bender, D. G., Hoffmeister, V. E., Ciro, C. A., Ross, H. M., Randall, K., & Loving, G. (2019). Teaching and evaluating interprofessional teamwork using sequenced instruction and TeamSTEPPS™ Team Performance Observation Tool (TPOT). Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, 16, Article 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2019.01.009
Skinner, C. H., Wallace, M. A., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2002). Academic remediation: Educational applications of research on assignment preference and choice. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1–2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v24n01_04
Sluijsmans, D. M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2010). Flexible peer assessment formats to acknowledge individual contributions during (web-based) collaborative learning. E-collaborative knowledge construction: Learning from computer-supported and virtual environments (pp. 139–161). IGI Global.
Stenalt, M. H. (2021). Researching student agency in digital education as if the social aspects matter: Students’ experience of participatory dimensions of online peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1798355
Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1680
Tárraga Mínguez, R., Sanz Cervera, P., Tijeras Iborra, A., & Cano Fernández, J. (2020). Evaluación entre iguales a través de blogs en formación de maestros. Valoraciones de los estudiantes. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 6(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i1.6629
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Topping, K. J. (2023). Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 38(3), 472–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1961301
Touimi, Y. B., Faddouli, N., Bennani, S., & Idrissi, M. K. (2013). Peer assessment in the context of project-based learning online. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(1).
Trautmann, N. M. (2009). Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9077-y
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1161–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2018). Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: Comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1405238
Valero, H. A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Wang, Y.-H. (2020). Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve active learning. Computers and Education, 156, Article 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103935
Welsh, M. (2012). Student perceptions of using the PebblePad e-portfolio system to support self- and peer-based formative assessment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.659884
Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.490577
Wilson, M. J., Diao, M. M., & Huang, L. (2015). ‘I’m not here to learn how to mark someone else’s stuff’: An investigation of an online peer-to-peer review workshop tool. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education: an investigation of an online peer-to-peer review workshop tool, 40(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.881980
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2022, November 7-9). A review of empirical studies on Peerceptiv. In 20th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, Antalya, Turkey (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET56107.2022.10031747
Yu, F.-Y., Liu, Y.-H., & Chan, T.-W. (2005). A web‐based learning system for question‐posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500062557
Zhan, Y. (2021). What matters in design? Cultivating undergraduates’ critical thinking through online peer assessment in a Confucian heritage context. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1804826
Zheng, C., Wang, L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: Effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 806–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1946562
Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533
Zong, Z., Wang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). Why students want to provide feedback to their peers: Drivers of feedback quantity and variation by type of course. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 31(4), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2021.1952726
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
