• SHIKHA SANORIA Department of Pharmacology, CT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jalandhar
  • ZULFKAR LATIEF QADRIE Department of Pharmacology, CT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jalandhar
  • SURYA PRAKASH GAUTAM Department of Pharmaceutics, CT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jalandhar


Objective: Wound care behavior among the population.

Methods: An observational survey was conducted randomly among different college students and the general population of all age groups having different professions. Survey questionnaires were prepared on google form and responses were collected by online mode. The form was designed to know the self-medication behavior among the population.

Results: The total number of participants was 332. Out of which female participants were dominated 174(52.4%) and male participants were 158(47.59%). The survey revealed that 58.73% of participants took doctor’s advice, 33.73% took self-medication, 4.22% took healthcare worker advice and, 3.31% took any other advice for treatment.

Conclusion: The survey revealed that although most of the population took doctor’s advice for the treatment of wounds but yet there is a significant population (33.73%) who took self-medication for this treatment, which should be minimized by providing awareness among them. Most of the wounds were healed within 10 d. Most of the population took medication (analgesic, antibiotic) for treatment. The use of antibiotics by self-medication is a matter of concern nowadays. As a global threat is antibiotic resistance. These drugs should be prescribed under medical supervision.

Keywords: Wound, Medication, Self-medication


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

ZULFKAR LATIEF QADRIE, Department of Pharmacology, CT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jalandhar

Professor & HOD, Pharmacology department


SURYA PRAKASH GAUTAM, Department of Pharmaceutics, CT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jalandhar

Director, pharmaceutic department


1. Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG. Wound healing: biological features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Prob Surg 2001;38:77-89.
2. Selvaraj Dhivya, Viswanadha Vijaya Padma, Elango Santhini. Wound dressings–a review. Biomedicine (Taipei) 2015;5:22-8.
3. Peng Hui Wang, Ben Shian Huang, Huann Cheng Horng, Chang Ching Yeh, Yi-Jen Che. Wound healing. J Chin Med Assoc 2018;81:94-101.
4. Rivera AE, Spencer JM. Clinical aspects of full-thickness wound healing. Clin Dermatol 2007;25:39-48.
5. Strecker McGraw MK, Jones TR, Baer DG. Soft tissue wounds and principles of healing. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2007;25:1-22.
6. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:514-25.
7. Shaw TJ, Martin P. Wound repair at a glance. J Cell Sci 2009;122:3209-13.
8. Gosain A, DiPietro LA. Aging and wound healing. World J Surg 2004;28:321-6.
9. Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117 Suppl 7:12S-34S.
10. Campos AC, Groth AK, Branco AB. Assessment and nutritional aspects of wound healing. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2008;11:281-8.
11. Santram L, Gautam PV. Relevance and perspectives of experimental wound models in wound healing research. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:57-62.
12. Geetha VS, V Gupta N, G Dv, K Pk. Research and development in wound management products: a brief review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2018;11:17-24.
13. Kapp S, Santamaria N. How and why patients self-treat chronic wounds. Int Wound J 2017;14:1269-75.
57 Views | 154 Downloads
How to Cite
SANORIA, S., Z. L. QADRIE, and S. P. GAUTAM. “WOUND CARE BEHAVIOR AMONG THE POPULATION-A SURVEY”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 12, no. 10, Oct. 2020, pp. 22-28, doi:10.22159/ijpps.2020v12i10.39138.
Original Article(s)