SATISFACTION LEVEL OF PATIENTS, PHYSICIANS, AND PRIVATE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE CENTER MANAGERS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN INDONESIA

  • Rano K Sinuraya Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, UniversitasPadjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Rizky Abdulah Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, UniversitasPadjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Ajeng Diantini Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, UniversitasPadjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Auliya A Suwantika Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, UniversitasPadjadjaran, Indonesia

Abstract

Objective:Program PengelolaanPenyakitKronis (PROLANIS) or Chronic Disease Management Program (CDMP) is a healthcare system that was conducted by Healthcare and Social Security Agency in Indonesia to improve patients’ quality of life. The objective of this study was to analyze level satisfaction of patients, physicians, and private Primary Healthcare Centers (PHCs) with this program, focusing on hypertension care.

Methods:This study was conducted in 7 private PHCs in Bandung City, Indonesia. A cross sectional study was performed to measure patient satisfaction with PSQ-18 on 143 PROLANIS patients with hypertension. A total number of 8 physicians and 7 private PHC managers were involved in this study. Level satisfaction of physicians and private PHC managers were observed by using in-depth interviews.

Results:The results showed that patient satisfaction was estimated to be 68.52±8.54, which could be interpreted that patient satisfy with PROLANIS. In-depth interviews showed that physicians did not satisfy with PROLANIS due to several factors (e.g., unintegrated prescription systems, lack of medicines, uncompleted laboratory facilities, lack of physicians, unintegrated referral services, and lack of collaboration between primary and secondary healthcare system). On the other hand, private PHC managers were quite satisfied with PROLANIS due to its linearity with other activities in private PHCs.

Conclusion:Level satisfaction of patients with PROLANIS is quite good, while physicians might not satisfy with this program. In particular, private PHC managers confirmed that they are satisfied with this program
Keywords: PROLANIS, Hypertension, Satisfaction level, Patient Preference.

References

1. Ayala C, Greenlund K, Croft J, Neff L, Dai S, Zheng Z, et al. State-specific trends in self-reported blood pressure screening and high blood pressure, United States, 1991-1999. CDC. 2012;51(21):456.
2. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311(5):507-20.
3. Indonesian basic health research. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of Indonesia; 2013.
4. Health profile of Bandung City, Indonesia. Bandung: Department of Health of Bandung City; 2012.
5. HSSA. Chronic disease management program in Indonesia2014. Available from: bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/dmdocuments/06-PROLANIS.pdf.
6. Marshall G, Hays R. The patient satisfaction questionnaire short form (PSQ-18). RAND Health. 1994.
7. Thayaparan A, Mahdi E. The patient satisfaction questionaire short form (PSQ-18) as an adaptable, reliable, and validated tool for use in various setting. Med Educ. 2013;18.
8. Grogan S, Conner M, Norman P, Willits D, Porter I. Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. . Quality in Health Care. 2000;9:201-15.
9. Tyssen R, Palmer KS, Solberg IB, Voltmer E, Frank E. Physicians’ perceptions of quality of care, professional autonomy, and job satisfaction in Canada, Norway, and the United States. BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13:516.
10. Mboi N. Indonesia: On the Way to Universal Health Care. Health Systems & Reform. 2015;1(2):91-7.
11. IY IG, Al-Jaber O. Study of satisfaction of diabetic patients attending the diabetes clinic at primary health care centers in Abha City, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2014;3(436):443.
12. K KG, Perianayagam W, Manaf R, Jadoo S, Al-Dubai S. Patient satisfaction in Malaysia’s busiest outpatient medical care. The Scientific World Journal. 2015:1-6.
13. Mohamed EY, Sami W, Alotaibi A, Alfarag A, Almutairi A, Alanzi F. Patients’ Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Centers’ Services, Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi of Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015;9(2):163–70.
14. Alotaibi M, Alazemi T, Alazemi F, Bakir Y. Patient satisfaction with primary health-care services in Kuwait. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2014;21(3):249-57.
15. Van-Ham I, Verhoeven A, Groenier K, Groothoff J, J. JD-H. Job satisfaction among general practitioners: a systematic literature review. The European Journal of General Practice. 2006;12(4):174-80.
16. Scheurer D, McKean S, Miller J, Wetterneck T. U.S. physician satisfaction: A systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:560–8.
17. Djuhaeni H, Gondodiputro S. Health Economic. Bandung: Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjajdaran; 2012.
18. Grembowski D, Ulrich CM, Paschane D, Diehr P, Katon W, Martin D, et al. Managed care and primary physician satisfaction. J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16(5):383-93.
19. Bleich SN, Özaltin E, Murray CJ. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2008;87:271-8.
20. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia nomor 12 tahun 2013 Tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. Presidential Decree 12 of 2013 on Health Insurance. 2013.
21. UU 40/2004 tentang Sistem Jaminan Social Nasional (SJSN). Law 40/2004 on the National Social Security System. 2014.
Statistics
347 Views | 214 Downloads
Citatons
How to Cite
Sinuraya, R. K., R. Abdulah, A. Diantini, and A. A. Suwantika. “SATISFACTION LEVEL OF PATIENTS, PHYSICIANS, AND PRIVATE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE CENTER MANAGERS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN INDONESIA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 10, no. 14, May 2017, pp. 131-5, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10s2.20414.
Section
Original Article(s)